EMR vs TER vs GGG Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric, Teradyne and Graco Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$167.78 +5.3% 1M +24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$93.59B
P/E
36.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.33%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
1 win
TER Teradyne, Inc
$313.24 -21.9% 1M +117.0% 1Y
Market cap
$48.98B
P/E
54.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.00B
Div. yield
0.16%
Test and Measurement Technology
3 wins
GGG Graco Inc
$67.19 -14.1% 1M -17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$10.78B
P/E
20.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.31B
Div. yield
1.73%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Graco leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Graco 8, Teradyne 3, Emerson Electric 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRTERGGGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $93.59B $48.98B $10.78B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.4x 54.2x 20.9x GGG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.9x 32.5x 20.0x GGG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +74.9% +5.4% TER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% — 22.4% GGG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% — 19.5% GGG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — 0.0x GGG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.33% 0.16% 1.73% GGG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.7% +117.0% -17.4% TER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr +17.8%/yr -2.2%/yr TER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 78.7% 26.3% GGG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 60/100 72/100 GGG

Percentile Scorecard

EMRTERGGG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRTERGGG
Valuation 33 #136 of 203 18 #91 of 111 50 #102 of 203
Growth 39 #115 of 188 95 #6 of 108 35 #123 of 188
Profitability 87 #25 of 184 87 #14 of 104 98 #4 of 184
Financial Health 30 #153 of 217 65 #41 of 115 86 #32 of 217
Shareholder Returns 37 #97 of 153 35 #51 of 78 93 #12 of 153
Overall 45 60 72
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TER ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • GGG ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRTERGGGSPY
1 month +5.3%-21.9%-14.1% +0.9%
3 months +15.1%-1.9%-17.3% +5.9%
6 months +22.9%+2.3%-15.6% +8.5%
Year to date +26.4%+61.8%-18.0% +13.3%
1 year +24.7%+117.0%-17.4% +12.4%
3 years +90.6%+273.6%-8.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +24.0%+55.2%-3.0% +23.5%
5 years +73.0%+126.6%-10.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +11.6%+17.8%-2.2% +11.0%
10 years +235.0%+1,257.2%+170.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year +12.9%+29.8%+10.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureEMRTERGGGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%78.7%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%85.4%31.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.543.380.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.781.49-0.66 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-59.7%-30.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-35.3%-29.1% -0.9%
52-week high $167.78$483.84$94.82 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$144.38$66.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRTERGGG
P/E now vs peer median 36.4xmedian 25.4x 54.2xmedian 33.5x 20.9xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.9x 9.8xmedian 2.8x 4.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 14.3x —median 19.6x 14.8xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 21.8x 80.9xmedian 29.8x 18.0xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.2x 13.3xmedian 2.9x 4.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.88median 1.41 —median 1.10 12.96median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRTERGGG
Revenue $18.64B $5.00B $2.31B
Gross profit $9.91B $2.97B $1.20B
Operating income $4.68B $1.61B $619.56M
Net income $2.58B $1.38B $517.48M
Free cash flow $3.46B – $600.10M
R&D – $598.20M $82.33M
EPS (diluted) $4.59 – $3.17
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $460.74M $139.82M
Total debt $13.11B – $215.70M
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 157.69M 163.02M
Enterprise value $86.34B $49.03B $8.79B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRTERGGG
P/E 36.4x 54.2x 20.9x
P/FCF 27.0x 80.9x 18.0x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x 36.8x 16.3x
P/S 5.0x 9.8x 4.7x
P/B 4.6x 13.3x 4.4x
P/Tangible book 8.0x 13.6x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.0x – 14.8x
EV/EBIT 22.4x – 17.4x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 9.8x 4.7x
EV/FCF 30.2x – 17.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.7x 36.8x 16.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.88 – 12.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRTERGGG
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 74.9% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 22.2% 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% 76.1% 4.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 23.4% 1.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% 214.6% 3.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 43.5% -0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% 211.2% 3.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 39.9% -0.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% – 7.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% – 1.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 96.9% -1.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 36.8% 3.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% – -4.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% – 14.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRTERGGG
Gross margin 53.2% – 52.0%
EBITDA margin 33.1% – 31.6%
Operating margin 25.1% – 26.8%
Pretax margin 17.6% – 27.6%
Net margin 13.8% – 22.4%
FCF margin 18.6% – 26.0%
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% 26.6% 28.6%
Return on equity 12.7% 38.7% 20.7%
Return on assets 6.1% 26.7% 16.2%
Return on invested capital 10.9% – 19.5%
Return on capital employed 14.9% – 23.2%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.0x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 1.6% 1.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRTERGGG
Debt / assets 31.1% – 4.1%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – 0.0x
Debt / FCF 3.8x – 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 31.4% 24.3%
Equity / assets 48.3% 67.7% 75.7%
Interest coverage – – 189.0x
Current ratio 0.9x 2.1x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x – 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 0.3x
Altman Z-score 4.73 – 10.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRTERGGG
Dividend yield 1.3% 0.2% 1.7%
Net buyback yield 1.0% – 4.3%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 0.2% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRTERGGG
Forward P/E 24.9xFY2026 32.5xFY2026 20.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2026 $9.65FY2026 $3.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +143.7%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% +25.7% +7.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $5.01BFY2026 $2.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 +57.1%FY2026 -1.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% +18.9% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRTERGGG
Held by institutions 82.1% 97.3% 91.0%
Institutions holding 2,291 1,419 730
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +5.2% +0.8%
Institutions buying 1,081 828 337
Institutions selling 798 456 280
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.82 1.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRTERGGG
EMR 1.00 0.52 0.49
TER 0.52 1.00 0.22
GGG 0.49 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR, TER and GGG?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $93.59B, Teradyne (TER) $48.98B, Graco (GGG) $10.78B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR, TER and GGG?

Graco (GGG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.4x, Teradyne (TER) 54.2x, Graco (GGG) 20.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Graco (GGG) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.9x, Teradyne (TER) 32.5x, Graco (GGG) 20.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teradyne (TER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Teradyne (TER) +74.9%, Graco (GGG) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Graco (GGG) has the highest net margin (Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Graco (GGG) 22.4%). On return on invested capital, Graco (GGG) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Graco (GGG) 19.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Teradyne (TER) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +24.7%, Teradyne (TER) +117.0%, Graco (GGG) -17.4%. Over five years, Teradyne (TER) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.6%/yr, Teradyne (TER) +17.8%/yr, Graco (GGG) -2.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Graco (GGG) has the highest dividend yield: Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.33%, Teradyne (TER) 0.16%, Graco (GGG) 1.73%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Graco (GGG) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, Teradyne (TER) 78.7%, Graco (GGG) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMR, TER and GGG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Graco (GGG) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.