EMR vs SNA Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric and Snap-on Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$161.75 +2.3% 1M +21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$90.22B
P/E
35.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.38%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
2 wins
SNA Snap-on Inc
$358.00 -3.0% 1M +4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$18.52B
P/E
18.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.73%
Power Tools Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Snap-on leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Snap-on 6, Emerson Electric 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRSNALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.22B $18.52B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.1x 18.3x SNA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.0x 19.0x SNA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.38% 2.73% SNA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.9% +4.1% EMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.0%/yr +12.1%/yr SNA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.7% 19.1% SNA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 65/100 SNA

Percentile Scorecard

EMRSNA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRSNA
Valuation 35 #133 of 203 52 #98 of 203
Growth 40 #112 of 187 33 #126 of 187
Profitability 85 #29 of 185 68 #60 of 185
Financial Health 29 #155 of 219 86 #32 of 219
Shareholder Returns 36 #98 of 153 88 #19 of 153
Overall 45 65
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SNA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRSNASPY
1 month +2.3%-3.0% -0.8%
3 months +8.3%-12.1% +3.5%
6 months +14.3%-6.9% +7.0%
Year to date +21.9%+3.9% +12.2%
1 year +21.9%+4.1% +13.0%
3 years +83.7%+41.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +22.5%+12.4% +23.1%
5 years +68.2%+77.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +11.0%+12.1% +11.0%
10 years +220.7%+131.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.4%+8.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureEMRSNASPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.7%19.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%19.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.530.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.690.21 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-21.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.6%-14.6% -1.8%
52-week high $164.37$419.26 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$328.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRSNA
P/E now vs peer median 35.1xmedian 26.0x 18.3xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.4xmedian 14.0x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.1xmedian 21.4x 17.2xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 2.2x 3.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.84median 1.26 12.84median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRSNA
Revenue $18.64B –
Gross profit $9.91B –
Operating income $4.68B $1.31B
Net income $2.58B $1.04B
Free cash flow $3.46B –
EPS (diluted) $4.59 $19.25
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $1.67B
Total debt $13.11B –
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 52.52M
Enterprise value $82.98B $18.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRSNA
P/E 35.1x 18.3x
P/FCF 26.1x 17.2x
P/Operating cash flow 23.1x 16.0x
P/S 4.8x 3.6x
P/B 4.4x 3.0x
P/Tangible book 7.7x 3.2x
EV/EBITDA 16.4x –
EV/EBIT 21.6x –
EV/Revenue 5.4x –
EV/FCF 29.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 25.8x 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.84 12.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRSNA
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% -0.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 0.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% -0.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% 0.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% 1.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 4.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 2.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRSNA
Gross margin 53.2% –
EBITDA margin 33.1% –
Operating margin 25.1% –
Pretax margin 17.6% –
Net margin 13.8% –
FCF margin 18.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% –
Return on equity 12.7% 17.0%
Return on assets 6.1% 12.0%
Return on invested capital 10.9% –
Return on capital employed 14.9% –
Asset turnover 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRSNA
Debt / assets 31.1% –
Debt / equity 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 3.8x –
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 29.3%
Equity / assets 48.3% 70.7%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 0.9x 3.5x
Quick ratio 0.5x –
Cash ratio 0.2x –
Altman Z-score 4.64 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRSNA
Dividend yield 1.4% 2.7%
Net buyback yield 1.0% –
Shareholder yield 2.4% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRSNA
Forward P/E 24.0xFY2026 19.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.74FY2026 $18.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.3%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.4% +18.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $4.66BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% +15.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRSNA
Held by institutions 82.1% 96.3%
Institutions holding 2,290 1,069
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +2.8%
Institutions buying 1,080 497
Institutions selling 798 370
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRSNA
EMR 1.00 0.56
SNA 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR and SNA?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $90.22B, Snap-on (SNA) $18.52B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR and SNA?

Snap-on (SNA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 35.1x, Snap-on (SNA) 18.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Snap-on (SNA) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.0x, Snap-on (SNA) 19.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Emerson Electric (EMR) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +21.9%, Snap-on (SNA) +4.1%. Over five years, Snap-on (SNA) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.0%/yr, Snap-on (SNA) +12.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Snap-on (SNA) has the highest dividend yield: Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.38%, Snap-on (SNA) 2.73%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Snap-on (SNA) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.7%, Snap-on (SNA) 19.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do EMR and SNA move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.56, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, EMR and SNA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Snap-on (SNA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.