EMR vs NRG vs TER Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric, Nrg Energy and Teradyne Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$167.78 +5.3% 1M +24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$93.59B
P/E
36.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.33%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
5 wins
NRG Nrg Energy, Inc.
$96.99 0.0% 1M -43.9% 1Y
Market cap
$20.40B
P/E
26.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$33.13B
Div. yield
1.91%
Independent Power Producers Utilities
5 wins
TER Teradyne, Inc
$313.24 -21.9% 1M +117.0% 1Y
Market cap
$48.98B
P/E
54.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.00B
Div. yield
0.16%
Test and Measurement Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Emerson Electric leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Emerson Electric 5, Nrg Energy 5, Teradyne 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRNRGTERLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $93.59B $20.40B $48.98B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.4x 26.2x 54.2x NRG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.9x 11.4x 32.5x NRG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +12.8% +74.9% TER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% 2.4% — EMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% 5.8% — EMR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 6.2x — EMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.33% 1.91% 0.16% NRG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.7% -43.9% +117.0% TER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr +19.5%/yr +17.8%/yr NRG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 50.0% 78.7% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 65/100 60/100 NRG

Percentile Scorecard

EMRNRGTER

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRNRGTER
Valuation 33 #136 of 203 70 #8 of 24 18 #91 of 111
Growth 39 #115 of 188 77 #6 of 23 95 #6 of 108
Profitability 87 #25 of 184 73 #7 of 23 87 #14 of 104
Financial Health 30 #153 of 217 17 #20 of 24 65 #41 of 115
Shareholder Returns 37 #97 of 153 89 #3 of 19 35 #51 of 78
Overall 45 65 60
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • NRG ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • TER ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRNRGTERSPY
1 month +5.3%0.0%-21.9% +0.9%
3 months +15.1%-21.9%-1.9% +5.9%
6 months +22.9%-34.9%+2.3% +8.5%
Year to date +26.4%-39.1%+61.8% +13.3%
1 year +24.7%-43.9%+117.0% +12.4%
3 years +90.6%+132.8%+273.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +24.0%+32.6%+55.2% +23.5%
5 years +73.0%+143.1%+126.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +11.6%+19.5%+17.8% +11.0%
10 years +235.0%+841.7%+1,257.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year +12.9%+25.1%+29.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureEMRNRGTERSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%50.0%78.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%55.6%85.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.541.413.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.881.49 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-49.8%-59.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-47.3%-35.3% -0.9%
52-week high $167.78$184.03$483.84 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$92.32$144.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRNRGTER
P/E now vs peer median 36.4xmedian 25.4x 26.2xmedian 24.9x 54.2xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.9x 0.6xmedian 2.7x 9.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 14.3x 11.6xmedian 11.6x —median 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 21.8x 58.6xmedian 13.8x 80.9xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.2x 4.2xmedian 2.1x 13.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.88median 1.41 0.77median 0.61 —median 1.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRNRGTER
Revenue $18.64B $33.13B $5.00B
Gross profit $9.91B $6.23B $2.97B
Operating income $4.68B $2.02B $1.61B
Net income $2.58B $849.00M $1.38B
Free cash flow $3.46B $348.00M –
R&D – – $598.20M
EPS (diluted) $4.59 $3.69 –
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $162.00M $460.74M
Total debt $13.11B $23.44B –
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 212.00M 157.69M
Enterprise value $86.34B $14.62B $49.03B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRNRGTER
P/E 36.4x 26.2x 54.2x
P/FCF 27.0x 58.6x 80.9x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x 13.1x 36.8x
P/S 5.0x 0.6x 9.8x
P/B 4.6x 4.2x 13.3x
P/Tangible book 8.0x 7.5x 13.6x
EV/EBITDA 17.0x 11.6x –
EV/EBIT 22.4x 21.7x –
EV/Revenue 5.6x 1.3x 9.8x
EV/FCF 30.2x 125.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 26.7x 28.1x 36.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.88 0.77 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRNRGTER
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 12.8% 74.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 2.9% 22.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% 22.9% 76.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 348.5% 23.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% 57.9% 214.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 43.0% 43.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% 62.6% 211.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 34.1% 39.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% 58.9% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% 34.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% -32.1% 96.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 33.9% 36.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% -75.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% 27.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRNRGTER
Gross margin 53.2% 18.8% –
EBITDA margin 33.1% 11.4% –
Operating margin 25.1% 6.1% –
Pretax margin 17.6% 3.2% –
Net margin 13.8% 2.4% –
FCF margin 18.6% 1.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% 4.7% 26.6%
Return on equity 12.7% 17.5% 38.7%
Return on assets 6.1% 2.1% 26.7%
Return on invested capital 10.9% 5.8% –
Return on capital employed 14.9% 6.7% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.8x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.4% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRNRGTER
Debt / assets 31.1% 58.7% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 4.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 6.2x –
Debt / FCF 3.8x 67.3x –
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 87.8% 31.4%
Equity / assets 48.3% 12.2% 67.7%
Interest coverage – 2.0x –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.0x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.5x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 4.73 1.42 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRNRGTER
Dividend yield 1.3% 1.9% 0.2%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 8.0% –
Shareholder yield 2.3% 9.9% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% 51.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% 126.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% 7.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 9.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRNRGTER
Forward P/E 24.9xFY2026 11.4xFY2026 32.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2026 $8.49FY2026 $9.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +5.2%FY2026 +143.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% +28.7% +25.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $36.07BFY2026 $5.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026 +57.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% -0.9% +18.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRNRGTER
Held by institutions 82.1% 93.7% 97.3%
Institutions holding 2,291 1,023 1,419
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +0.7% +5.2%
Institutions buying 1,081 508 828
Institutions selling 798 385 456
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.32 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRNRGTER
EMR 1.00 0.29 0.52
NRG 0.29 1.00 0.41
TER 0.52 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR, NRG and TER?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $93.59B, Nrg Energy (NRG) $20.40B, Teradyne (TER) $48.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR, NRG and TER?

Nrg Energy (NRG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.4x, Nrg Energy (NRG) 26.2x, Teradyne (TER) 54.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nrg Energy (NRG) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.9x, Nrg Energy (NRG) 11.4x, Teradyne (TER) 32.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teradyne (TER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Nrg Energy (NRG) +12.8%, Teradyne (TER) +74.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest net margin (Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Nrg Energy (NRG) 2.4%). On return on invested capital, Emerson Electric (EMR) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Nrg Energy (NRG) 5.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Teradyne (TER) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +24.7%, Nrg Energy (NRG) -43.9%, Teradyne (TER) +117.0%. Over five years, Nrg Energy (NRG) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.6%/yr, Nrg Energy (NRG) +19.5%/yr, Teradyne (TER) +17.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Nrg Energy (NRG) has the highest dividend yield: Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.33%, Nrg Energy (NRG) 1.91%, Teradyne (TER) 0.16%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, Nrg Energy (NRG) 50.0%, Teradyne (TER) 78.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMR, NRG and TER?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Emerson Electric (EMR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.