EMR vs KMT vs WTS Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric, Kennametal and Watts Water Technologies Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$167.78 +5.3% 1M +24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$95.43B
P/E
37.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
1 win
KMT Kennametal Inc
$29.75 -6.4% 1M +31.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.28B
P/E
6.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.36B
Div. yield
0.03%
Power Tools Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kennametal leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Kennametal 6, Watts Water Technologies 5, Emerson Electric 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRKMTWTSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $95.43B $2.28B $11.77B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.0x 6.7x 30.7x KMT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.9x 5.7x 25.9x KMT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +19.8% +17.1% KMT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% 14.5% 14.3% KMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% 16.5% 16.8% WTS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.0x -0.4x WTS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.03% 0.01% KMT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.7% +31.2% +24.5% KMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr -5.6%/yr +12.5%/yr WTS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 44.3% 27.7% WTS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 65/100 72/100 WTS

Percentile Scorecard

EMRKMTWTS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRKMTWTS
Valuation 33 #136 of 203 72 #57 of 203 35 #133 of 203
Growth 39 #115 of 188 77 #44 of 188 79 #40 of 188
Profitability 87 #25 of 184 68 #59 of 184 92 #15 of 184
Financial Health 30 #153 of 217 52 #104 of 217 89 #24 of 217
Shareholder Returns 37 #97 of 153 55 #69 of 153 65 #55 of 153
Overall 45 65 72
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • KMT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WTS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRKMTWTSSPY
1 month +5.3%-6.4%-4.2% +0.9%
3 months +15.1%-11.4%+2.0% +5.9%
6 months +22.9%-22.8%+15.4% +8.5%
Year to date +26.4%+4.7%+24.3% +13.3%
1 year +24.7%+31.2%+24.5% +12.4%
3 years +90.6%+32.2%+102.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +24.0%+9.8%+26.5% +23.5%
5 years +73.0%-25.2%+80.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year +11.6%-5.6%+12.5% +11.0%
10 years +235.0%+7.8%+472.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year +12.9%+0.8%+19.1% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureEMRKMTWTSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%44.3%27.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%42.0%26.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.541.310.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.780.700.88 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-57.4%-44.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-31.2%-12.6% -0.9%
52-week high $167.78$43.27$392.27 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$21.95$263.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRKMTWTS
P/E now vs peer median 36.4xmedian 25.4x 6.6xmedian 25.4x 29.9xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.9x 4.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 14.3x 4.7xmedian 14.3x 18.8xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 21.8x -28.0xmedian 21.8x 32.8xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.2x 1.4xmedian 2.2x 5.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.88median 1.41 0.15median 1.41 2.33median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRKMTWTS
Revenue $18.64B $2.36B $2.68B
Gross profit $9.91B $969.96M $1.31B
Operating income $4.68B $472.53M $512.10M
Net income $2.58B $350.41M $383.80M
Free cash flow $3.46B -$80.91M $349.40M
EPS (diluted) $4.59 $4.42 $11.46
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $95.79M $347.90M
Total debt $13.11B $717.45M $108.00M
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 77.42M 33.50M
Enterprise value $88.17B $1.85B $10.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRKMTWTS
P/E 36.4x 6.6x 29.9x
P/FCF 27.0x -28.0x 32.8x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x -565.7x 28.8x
P/S 5.0x 1.0x 4.3x
P/B 4.6x 1.4x 5.2x
P/Tangible book 8.0x 1.5x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA 17.0x 4.7x 18.8x
EV/EBIT 22.4x 6.1x 21.9x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 1.2x 4.2x
EV/FCF 30.2x -35.7x 32.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.7x -720.9x 28.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.88 0.15 2.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRKMTWTS
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 19.8% 17.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 4.3% 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% 62.2% 18.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 14.5% 13.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% 230.2% 26.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 34.9% 15.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% 255.0% 23.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 41.6% 12.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% 269.9% 23.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% 44.8% 12.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% -101.9% 12.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% -26.3% 12.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% -167.8% 10.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% -35.6% 11.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRKMTWTS
Gross margin 53.2% 41.2% 48.9%
EBITDA margin 33.1% 26.1% 22.3%
Operating margin 25.1% 20.1% 19.1%
Pretax margin 17.6% 19.6% 19.0%
Net margin 13.8% 14.5% 14.3%
FCF margin 18.6% -3.4% 13.1%
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% -0.2% 14.9%
Return on equity 12.7% 23.3% 17.9%
Return on assets 6.1% 11.9% 13.0%
Return on invested capital 10.9% 16.5% 16.8%
Return on capital employed 14.9% 20.8% 21.1%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 0.0x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 1.5% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRKMTWTS
Debt / assets 31.1% 22.7% 3.7%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.0x -0.4x
Debt / FCF 3.8x -8.9x 0.3x
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 49.1% 25.8%
Equity / assets 48.3% 50.9% 74.2%
Interest coverage – 16.5x 50.2x
Current ratio 0.9x 2.6x 2.7x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.7x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 4.73 3.18 11.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRKMTWTS
Dividend yield 1.3% 2.7% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 0.8% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 3.5% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% 17.4% 19.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% -75.2% 21.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% -1.6% 21.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% -1.9% 20.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRKMTWTS
Forward P/E 24.9xFY2026 5.7xFY2027 25.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2026 $5.25FY2027 $13.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +14.9%FY2027 +25.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% -57.9% +13.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $3.22BFY2027 $3.02BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 +36.5%FY2027 +23.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% +13.7% -5.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRKMTWTS
Held by institutions 82.1% 100.0% 98.6%
Institutions holding 2,291 337 579
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +2.5% +1.9%
Institutions buying 1,081 198 295
Institutions selling 798 95 187
Buyers to sellers 1.35 2.08 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRKMTWTS
EMR 1.00 0.45 0.38
KMT 0.45 1.00 0.38
WTS 0.38 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR, KMT and WTS?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $95.43B, Kennametal (KMT) $2.28B, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) $11.77B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR, KMT and WTS?

Kennametal (KMT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 37.0x, Kennametal (KMT) 6.7x, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 30.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kennametal (KMT) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.9x, Kennametal (KMT) 5.7x, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 25.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kennametal (KMT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Kennametal (KMT) +19.8%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) +17.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kennametal (KMT) has the highest net margin (Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Kennametal (KMT) 14.5%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 14.3%). On return on invested capital, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Kennametal (KMT) 16.5%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 16.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kennametal (KMT) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +24.7%, Kennametal (KMT) +31.2%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) +24.5%. Over five years, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.6%/yr, Kennametal (KMT) -5.6%/yr, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) +12.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kennametal (KMT) has the highest dividend yield: Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%, Kennametal (KMT) 0.03%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 0.01%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, Kennametal (KMT) 44.3%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 27.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMR, KMT and WTS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kennametal (KMT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.