EMR vs KLAC vs LRCX Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric, Kla and Lam Research Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$167.78 +5.3% 1M +24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$93.59B
P/E
36.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.33%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$158.77 -16.1% 1M +31.6% 1Y
Market cap
$207.51B
P/E
41.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.06B
Div. yield
0.29%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$253.82 -19.3% 1M +63.1% 1Y
Market cap
$317.06B
P/E
37.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
0.44%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 8, Emerson Electric 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRKLACLRCXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $93.59B $207.51B $317.06B LRCX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.4x 41.5x 37.6x EMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.9x 28.0x 25.1x EMR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +12.2% +33.4% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% — 32.3% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% — 49.6% LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — -0.4x LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.33% 0.29% 0.44% EMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.7% +31.6% +63.1% LRCX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr +33.6%/yr +35.1%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 61.5% 65.8% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 43/100 67/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

EMRKLACLRCX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRKLACLRCX
Valuation 33 #136 of 203 36 #61 of 94 50 #48 of 94
Growth 39 #115 of 188 54 #43 of 92 85 #15 of 92
Profitability 87 #25 of 184 92 #8 of 90 96 #5 of 90
Financial Health 30 #153 of 217 5 #94 of 99 44 #56 of 99
Shareholder Returns 37 #97 of 153 29 #52 of 73 61 #29 of 73
Overall 45 43 67
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRKLACLRCXSPY
1 month +5.3%-16.1%-19.3% +0.9%
3 months +15.1%-6.7%+0.6% +5.9%
6 months +22.9%-12.6%+2.0% +8.5%
Year to date +26.4%+30.7%+48.3% +13.3%
1 year +24.7%+31.6%+63.1% +12.4%
3 years +90.6%+246.7%+334.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +24.0%+51.4%+63.2% +23.5%
5 years +73.0%+325.9%+350.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +11.6%+33.6%+35.1% +11.0%
10 years +235.0%+2,026.6%+2,538.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +12.9%+35.8%+38.7% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureEMRKLACLRCXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%61.5%65.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%65.7%65.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.542.803.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.780.510.96 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-51.7%-56.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-47.4%-41.4% -0.9%
52-week high $167.78$301.71$433.33 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$109.71$139.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRKLACLRCX
P/E now vs peer median 36.4xmedian 25.4x 41.5xmedian 46.0x 37.6xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.9x 14.8xmedian 7.9x 12.1xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 14.3x —median 28.3x 31.0xmedian 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 21.8x 68.2xmedian 41.4x 48.5xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.2x 31.8xmedian 4.6x 22.8xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.88median 1.41 2.20median 2.30 1.21median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRKLACLRCX
Revenue $18.64B $14.06B $26.13B
Gross profit $9.91B – $13.34B
Operating income $4.68B – $9.65B
Net income $2.58B $5.02B $8.45B
Free cash flow $3.46B – $6.54B
R&D – $1.53B $2.47B
EPS (diluted) $4.59 $3.80 $6.73
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $1.53B $7.44B
Total debt $13.11B – $16.44B
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 1.32B 1.26B
Enterprise value $86.34B $207.51B $293.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRKLACLRCX
P/E 36.4x 41.5x 37.6x
P/FCF 27.0x 68.2x 48.5x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x 43.5x 41.8x
P/S 5.0x 14.8x 12.1x
P/B 4.6x 31.8x 22.8x
P/Tangible book 8.0x 32.9x 22.8x
EV/EBITDA 17.0x – 31.0x
EV/EBIT 22.4x – 32.5x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 14.8x 12.0x
EV/FCF 30.2x – 47.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.7x 43.5x 41.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.88 2.20 1.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRKLACLRCX
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 12.2% 33.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 11.4% 18.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% – 38.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% – 23.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% – 49.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% – 29.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% 18.4% 45.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 17.4% 28.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% 18.8% 47.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% 18.9% 31.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 12.2% 18.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 10.4% 15.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% – 17.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% – 13.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRKLACLRCX
Gross margin 53.2% – 51.1%
EBITDA margin 33.1% – 38.7%
Operating margin 25.1% – 37.0%
Pretax margin 17.6% – 37.2%
Net margin 13.8% – 32.3%
FCF margin 18.6% – 25.0%
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% 33.9% 29.0%
Return on equity 12.7% 77.9% 64.1%
Return on assets 6.1% 27.6% 33.9%
Return on invested capital 10.9% – 49.6%
Return on capital employed 14.9% – 54.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.0x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 2.2% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRKLACLRCX
Debt / assets 31.1% – 14.2%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – -0.4x
Debt / FCF 3.8x – 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 64.6% 47.2%
Equity / assets 48.3% 35.4% 52.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x 2.8x 2.5x
Quick ratio 0.5x – 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 1.0x
Altman Z-score 4.73 – 19.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRKLACLRCX
Dividend yield 1.3% 0.3% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 1.0% – 1.2%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 0.3% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRKLACLRCX
Forward P/E 24.9xFY2026 28.0xFY2027 25.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2026 $5.67FY2027 $10.12FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027 +73.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% +16.6% +12.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027 $32.96BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027 +41.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% +8.6% +25.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRKLACLRCX
Held by institutions 82.1% 91.0% 85.6%
Institutions holding 2,291 2,478 3,132
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +4.2% +6.2%
Institutions buying 1,081 1,285 1,696
Institutions selling 798 982 1,163
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.31 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRKLACLRCX
EMR 1.00 0.49 0.47
KLAC 0.49 1.00 0.88
LRCX 0.47 0.88 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR, KLAC and LRCX?

Lam Research (LRCX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $93.59B, Kla (KLAC) $207.51B, Lam Research (LRCX) $317.06B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR, KLAC and LRCX?

Emerson Electric (EMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.4x, Kla (KLAC) 41.5x, Lam Research (LRCX) 37.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Emerson Electric (EMR) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.9x, Kla (KLAC) 28.0x, Lam Research (LRCX) 25.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Kla (KLAC) +12.2%, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lam Research (LRCX) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +24.7%, Kla (KLAC) +31.6%, Lam Research (LRCX) +63.1%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.6%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +33.6%/yr, Lam Research (LRCX) +35.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest dividend yield: Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.33%, Kla (KLAC) 0.29%, Lam Research (LRCX) 0.44%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, Kla (KLAC) 61.5%, Lam Research (LRCX) 65.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMR, KLAC and LRCX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.