EMR vs ITW vs GGG Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric, Illinois Tool Works and Graco Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$167.78 +5.3% 1M +24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$95.26B
P/E
37.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc
$276.03 +0.8% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$80.03B
P/E
24.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.65B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins
GGG Graco Inc
$67.19 -14.1% 1M -17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.05B
P/E
21.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.31B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Graco leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Graco 6, Emerson Electric 3, Illinois Tool Works 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRITWGGGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $95.26B $80.03B $11.05B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.0x 24.8x 21.4x GGG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.9x 25.9x 20.0x GGG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +4.8% +5.4% GGG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% 19.4% 22.4% GGG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% 27.1% 19.5% ITW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.8x 0.0x GGG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.02% 0.00% ITW
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.7% +12.3% -17.4% EMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr +3.9%/yr -2.2%/yr EMR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 21.2% 26.3% ITW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 50/100 72/100 GGG

Percentile Scorecard

EMRITWGGG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRITWGGG
Valuation 33 #136 of 203 29 #145 of 203 50 #102 of 203
Growth 39 #115 of 188 34 #124 of 188 35 #123 of 188
Profitability 87 #25 of 184 100 #2 of 184 98 #4 of 184
Financial Health 30 #153 of 217 26 #160 of 217 86 #32 of 217
Shareholder Returns 37 #97 of 153 62 #59 of 153 93 #12 of 153
Overall 45 50 72
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ITW ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • GGG ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRITWGGGSPY
1 month +5.3%+0.8%-14.1% +0.9%
3 months +15.1%-5.6%-17.3% +5.9%
6 months +22.9%+3.9%-15.6% +8.5%
Year to date +26.4%+12.1%-18.0% +13.3%
1 year +24.7%+12.3%-17.4% +12.4%
3 years +90.6%+23.6%-8.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +24.0%+7.3%-3.0% +23.5%
5 years +73.0%+21.1%-10.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +11.6%+3.9%-2.2% +11.0%
10 years +235.0%+142.5%+170.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year +12.9%+9.3%+10.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureEMRITWGGGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%21.2%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%20.8%31.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.540.470.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.780.58-0.66 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-28.9%-30.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-7.9%-29.1% -0.9%
52-week high $167.78$299.60$94.82 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$241.07$66.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRITWGGG
P/E now vs peer median 36.4xmedian 25.4x 24.3xmedian 25.4x 20.9xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.9x 4.7xmedian 1.9x 4.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 14.3x 18.0xmedian 14.3x 14.8xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 21.8x 27.4xmedian 21.8x 18.0xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.2x 25.0xmedian 2.2x 4.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.88median 1.41 8.41median 1.41 12.96median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRITWGGG
Revenue $18.64B $16.65B $2.31B
Gross profit $9.91B $7.38B $1.20B
Operating income $4.68B $4.43B $619.56M
Net income $2.58B $3.23B $517.48M
Free cash flow $3.46B $2.87B $600.10M
R&D – – $82.33M
EPS (diluted) $4.59 $11.31 $3.17
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $809.00M $139.82M
Total debt $13.11B $9.37B $215.70M
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 285.30M 163.02M
Enterprise value $88.00B $76.70B $9.07B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRITWGGG
P/E 36.4x 24.3x 20.9x
P/FCF 27.0x 27.4x 18.0x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x 24.0x 16.3x
P/S 5.0x 4.7x 4.7x
P/B 4.6x 25.0x 4.4x
P/Tangible book 8.0x 30.2x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.0x 18.0x 14.8x
EV/EBIT 22.4x 19.6x 17.4x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 5.2x 4.7x
EV/FCF 30.2x 30.3x 17.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.7x 26.7x 16.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.88 8.41 12.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRITWGGG
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 4.8% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 1.1% 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% 5.7% 4.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 2.8% 1.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% 6.4% 3.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 3.1% -0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% 6.7% 3.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 0.9% -0.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% 9.1% 7.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% 2.9% 1.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% -0.5% -1.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% -0.5% 3.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 0.8% -4.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% 0.4% 14.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRITWGGG
Gross margin 53.2% 44.3% 52.0%
EBITDA margin 33.1% 29.0% 31.6%
Operating margin 25.1% 26.6% 26.8%
Pretax margin 17.6% 25.2% 27.6%
Net margin 13.8% 19.4% 22.4%
FCF margin 18.6% 17.2% 26.0%
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% 19.6% 28.6%
Return on equity 12.7% 106.9% 20.7%
Return on assets 6.1% 19.6% 16.2%
Return on invested capital 10.9% 27.1% 19.5%
Return on capital employed 14.9% 38.9% 23.2%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.0x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.5% 1.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRITWGGG
Debt / assets 31.1% 56.8% 4.1%
Debt / equity 0.6x 3.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.8x 0.0x
Debt / FCF 3.8x 3.3x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 81.0% 24.3%
Equity / assets 48.3% 19.0% 75.7%
Interest coverage – 14.3x 189.0x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.3x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.8x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 4.73 8.17 10.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRITWGGG
Dividend yield 1.3% 2.4% 1.7%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 2.1% 4.3%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 4.4% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% 57.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% 64.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% 5.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 5.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRITWGGG
Forward P/E 24.9xFY2026 25.9xFY2026 20.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2026 $10.67FY2026 $3.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% +19.3% +7.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $16.46BFY2026 $2.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 -1.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% +11.4% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRITWGGG
Held by institutions 82.1% 84.9% 91.0%
Institutions holding 2,291 1,969 730
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +0.8% +0.8%
Institutions buying 1,081 846 337
Institutions selling 798 750 280
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.13 1.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRITWGGG
EMR 1.00 0.55 0.49
ITW 0.55 1.00 0.53
GGG 0.49 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR, ITW and GGG?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $95.26B, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) $80.03B, Graco (GGG) $11.05B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR, ITW and GGG?

Graco (GGG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 37.0x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 24.8x, Graco (GGG) 21.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Graco (GGG) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.9x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 25.9x, Graco (GGG) 20.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Graco (GGG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.8%, Graco (GGG) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Graco (GGG) has the highest net margin (Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 19.4%, Graco (GGG) 22.4%). On return on invested capital, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 27.1%, Graco (GGG) 19.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Emerson Electric (EMR) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +24.7%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +12.3%, Graco (GGG) -17.4%. Over five years, Emerson Electric (EMR) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.6%/yr, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +3.9%/yr, Graco (GGG) -2.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has the highest dividend yield: Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 0.02%, Graco (GGG) 0.00%. Graco (GGG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 21.2%, Graco (GGG) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMR, ITW and GGG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Graco (GGG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.