ECXJ vs AENT vs QSR Stock Comparison

Cxj, Alliance Entertainment Holding and Restaurant Brands International Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ECXJ CXJ GROUP CO., Ltd
$1.29 -0.8% 1M -30.6% 1Y
Market cap
$131.93M
P/E
2,034x
Revenue (TTM)
$663.21K
Div. yield
–
Consumer Goods Distributors Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Restaurant Brands International leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Restaurant Brands International 5, Alliance Entertainment Holding 2, Cxj 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECXJAENTQSRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $131.93M $253.80M $25.82B QSR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2,034x 19.1x 20.3x AENT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 9.6x 18.8x AENT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +52.4% — +6.5% ECXJ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.8% — 13.1% QSR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 12.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 4.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.6% -18.9% +10.4% QSR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.6%/yr -13.1%/yr +5.7%/yr ECXJ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 372.6% 67.5% 25.0% QSR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 34/100 — 52/100 QSR

Percentile Scorecard

ECXJAENTQSR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECXJAENTQSR
Valuation 4 #100 of 104 26 #77 of 104 43 #29 of 50
Growth 66 #34 of 99 – 63 #18 of 47
Profitability 53 #47 of 99 – 67 #16 of 46
Financial Health 11 #101 of 113 37 #72 of 113 30 #36 of 51
Shareholder Returns – – 56 #15 of 33
Overall 34 – 52
  • ECXJ ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • AENT ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • QSR ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECXJAENTQSRSPY
1 month -0.8%+0.2%+3.9% -0.8%
3 months -4.4%-18.2%+0.0% +3.5%
6 months +61.3%-34.5%-5.6% +7.0%
Year to date -32.1%-39.5%+9.1% +12.2%
1 year -30.6%-18.9%+10.4% +13.0%
3 years +87.0%+291.2%+13.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +23.2%+57.6%+4.2% +23.1%
5 years +115.0%-50.4%+31.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +16.6%-13.1%+5.7% +11.0%
10 years +7.5%—+72.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +0.7%—+5.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureECXJAENTQSRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 372.6%67.5%25.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 1,481.3%71.8%25.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -2.751.090.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.08-0.280.42 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.3%-93.0%-27.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.1%-42.0%-8.8% -1.8%
52-week high $1.90$8.43$81.67 $779.14
52-week low $0.07$4.39$65.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECXJAENTQSR
P/E now vs peer median 2,034xmedian 16.7x 19.1xmedian 16.7x 20.4xmedian 20.5x
P/S now vs peer median 198.9xmedian 0.5x 0.5xmedian 0.5x 2.7xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -538.4xmedian 9.0x —median 9.0x 13.0xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4,167xmedian 16.5x -187.5xmedian 16.5x 15.9xmedian 17.5x
P/B now vs peer median -82.2xmedian 1.7x 4.5xmedian 1.7x 4.8xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 75.81median 0.72 —median 0.72 2.70median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECXJAENTQSR
Revenue $663.21K – $9.70B
Gross profit $409.81K – $5.24B
Operating income $43.82K – $2.61B
Net income $64.85K – $1.70B
Free cash flow -$31.66K – $1.63B
EPS (diluted) $0.00 – $2.77
Cash & equivalents $55.78K $814.00K $1.06B
Total debt – $73.72M $13.29B
Shares (diluted) 102.27M 51.05M 460.00M
Enterprise value $131.60M $247.15M $21.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECXJAENTQSR
P/E 2,034x 19.1x 20.4x
P/FCF -4,167x -187.5x 15.9x
P/Operating cash flow -4,167x – 13.7x
P/S 198.9x 0.5x 2.7x
P/B -82.2x 4.5x 4.8x
P/Tangible book -82.2x 5.4x -4.7x
EV/EBITDA -538.4x – 13.0x
EV/EBIT 3,009x – 14.7x
EV/Revenue 198.8x – 3.9x
EV/FCF -4,165x – 23.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -4,165x – 20.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 75.81 – 2.70

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECXJAENTQSR
Revenue growth (1Y) 52.4% – 6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -26.2% – 12.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.2% – 5.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -24.7% – 6.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 101.9% – 22.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.6% – 11.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 102.8% – 41.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.8% – 4.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 102.8% – 47.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.8% – 7.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 93.1% – 19.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -27.1% – 13.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 93.1% – 20.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -27.1% – 11.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECXJAENTQSR
Gross margin 61.8% – 54.0%
EBITDA margin -36.9% – 30.3%
Operating margin 6.6% – 26.9%
Pretax margin 11.1% – 21.7%
Net margin 9.8% – 13.1%
FCF margin -4.8% – 16.8%
Operating cash flow margin -4.8% – 19.6%
Return on equity – – 31.8%
Return on assets 22.4% – 6.8%
Return on invested capital – – 12.1%
Return on capital employed – – 11.5%
Asset turnover 2.0x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.5x – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECXJAENTQSR
Debt / assets – 18.5% 53.1%
Debt / equity – 0.6x 2.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 4.2x
Debt / FCF – – 8.1x
Liabilities / assets 582.9% 70.7% 78.4%
Equity / assets -482.9% 29.3% 21.6%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.2x 1.3x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.6x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 5.32 – 1.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECXJAENTQSR
Dividend yield – – 3.5%
Net buyback yield – – 0.5%
Shareholder yield – – 3.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECXJAENTQSR
Forward P/E – 9.6xFY2027 18.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.51FY2027 $3.96FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +96.2%FY2027 +7.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +21.6% +8.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.10BFY2027 $10.27BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -4.6%FY2027 +8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.5% -10.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECXJAENTQSR
Held by institutions – 0.8% 92.2%
Institutions holding – 19 575
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.6% +6.5%
Institutions buying – 10 319
Institutions selling – 4 165
Buyers to sellers – 2.50 1.93

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECXJAENTQSR
ECXJ 1.00 -0.01 0.00
AENT -0.01 1.00 0.06
QSR 0.00 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECXJ, AENT and QSR?

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cxj (ECXJ) $131.93M, Alliance Entertainment Holding (AENT) $253.80M, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) $25.82B.

Which stock is cheaper, ECXJ, AENT and QSR?

Alliance Entertainment Holding (AENT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cxj (ECXJ) 2,034x, Alliance Entertainment Holding (AENT) 19.1x, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 20.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alliance Entertainment Holding (AENT) is cheapest (Alliance Entertainment Holding (AENT) 9.6x, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 18.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cxj (ECXJ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cxj (ECXJ) +52.4%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) +6.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) has the highest net margin (Cxj (ECXJ) 9.8%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Restaurant Brands International (QSR) returned the most: Cxj (ECXJ) -30.6%, Alliance Entertainment Holding (AENT) -18.9%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) +10.4%. Over five years, Cxj (ECXJ) compounded fastest (Cxj (ECXJ) +16.6%/yr, Alliance Entertainment Holding (AENT) -13.1%/yr, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) +5.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) has been the steadiest (Cxj (ECXJ) 372.6%, Alliance Entertainment Holding (AENT) 67.5%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 25.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECXJ, AENT and QSR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.