ECO vs SFL vs STNG Stock Comparison

Okeanis Eco Tankers, Sfl and Scorpio Tankers Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
$92.91 +19.3% 1M +179.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.23B
P/E
8.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$706.47M
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
4 wins
SFL SFL Corp Ltd.
$12.70 -0.6% 1M +80.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.71B
P/E
26.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
1 win
STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc.
$85.46 +4.9% 1M +42.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.12B
P/E
5.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.22B
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Scorpio Tankers leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Scorpio Tankers 5, Okeanis Eco Tankers 4, Sfl 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECOSFLSTNGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.23B $1.71B $4.12B STNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.0x 26.3x 5.0x STNG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.3x 23.1x 7.0x ECO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +105.2% — +32.7% ECO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 56.9% — 67.2% STNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 6.1x -1.1x STNG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +179.0% +80.7% +42.0% ECO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +9.6%/yr +39.6%/yr STNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.0% 31.1% 36.3% SFL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 45/100 75/100 ECO

Percentile Scorecard

ECOSFLSTNG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECOSFLSTNG
Valuation 44 #77 of 136 31 #94 of 136 82 #26 of 136
Growth 100 #1 of 121 56 #54 of 121 68 #39 of 121
Profitability 100 #1 of 115 – 93 #9 of 115
Financial Health 72 #41 of 143 6 #134 of 143 93 #11 of 143
Shareholder Returns 98 #3 of 82 88 #11 of 82 37 #52 of 82
Overall 83 45 75
  • ECO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • SFL ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • STNG ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECOSFLSTNGSPY
1 month +19.3%-0.6%+4.9% -0.2%
3 months +59.2%+4.8%+8.0% +3.9%
6 months +69.9%+11.5%+5.4% +8.2%
Year to date +174.6%+62.6%+68.1% +12.9%
1 year +179.0%+80.7%+42.0% +12.3%
3 years +238.0%+17.5%+48.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +50.1%+5.5%+14.0% +23.3%
5 years —+58.4%+429.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+9.6%+39.6% +10.9%
10 years —-4.3%+104.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-0.4%+7.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureECOSFLSTNGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.0%31.1%36.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.2%29.1%34.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.280.380.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.892.601.16 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.0%-52.6%-61.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.4%-7.6%-3.7% -1.2%
52-week high $99.28$13.74$88.77 $779.14
52-week low $31.96$7.03$49.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECOSFLSTNG
P/E now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 16.3x 26.0xmedian 16.3x 4.9xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 1.0x —median 1.0x 3.6xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 8.7x 11.1xmedian 8.7x 3.3xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 11.4x —median 11.4x 5.7xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.2x 1.8xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.82 -1.44median 0.82 0.66median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECOSFLSTNG
Revenue $706.47M – $1.22B
Gross profit $657.71M – $933.45M
Operating income $440.43M – $833.54M
Net income $402.14M $64.88M $816.37M
Free cash flow $360.91M – $782.87M
EPS (diluted) $12.34 $0.49 $16.68
Cash & equivalents $222.59M $113.10M $1.84B
Total debt $2.67B $2.38B $3.04B
Shares (diluted) 32.58M 133.06M 48.95M
Enterprise value $2.71B -$144.42B -$60.12M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECOSFLSTNG
P/E 7.5x 26.0x 4.9x
P/FCF 9.1x – 5.7x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x – 5.7x
P/S 4.7x – 3.6x
P/B 3.8x 1.8x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 3.8x 1.8x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 11.1x 3.3x
EV/EBIT 8.6x 29.0x 4.0x
EV/Revenue 5.4x – 2.7x
EV/FCF 10.5x – 4.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.5x – 4.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.44 0.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECOSFLSTNG
Revenue growth (1Y) 105.2% – 32.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -10.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 118.4% – 51.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 288.4% – 105.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -6.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 498.6% 82.4% 127.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -18.9% -1.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 491.6% 78.2% 136.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -18.0% 7.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 316.0% – 49.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -11.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 316.0% – 49.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -11.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECOSFLSTNG
Gross margin 93.1% – 76.8%
EBITDA margin 69.0% – 82.9%
Operating margin 62.3% – 68.6%
Pretax margin 67.0% – 67.0%
Net margin 56.9% – 67.2%
FCF margin 51.1% – 64.4%
Operating cash flow margin 51.1% – 64.4%
Return on equity 50.2% – 23.2%
Return on assets 26.0% – 18.7%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 30.3% – 20.7%
Asset turnover 0.5x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – 6.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECOSFLSTNG
Debt / assets 43.8% 67.8% 15.7%
Debt / equity 0.8x 2.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 6.1x -1.1x
Debt / FCF 2.0x – 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 46.8% 70.6% 21.5%
Equity / assets 53.2% 29.4% 78.5%
Interest coverage – – 9.5x
Current ratio 4.4x 0.4x 6.9x
Quick ratio 3.8x 0.4x 6.3x
Cash ratio 2.3x 0.2x 5.6x
Altman Z-score 4.65 – 4.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECOSFLSTNG
Dividend yield 10.3% 6.6% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 10.3% 6.6% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECOSFLSTNG
Forward P/E 5.3xFY2026 23.1xFY2026 7.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.61FY2026 $0.55FY2026 $12.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +367.1%FY2026 +450.0%FY2026 +122.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -49.7% +76.4% -31.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $912.99MFY2026 $691.35MFY2026 $1.29BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +244.0%FY2026 -5.7%FY2026 +43.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -35.5% +19.5% -21.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECOSFLSTNG
Held by institutions 29.9% 43.5% 79.3%
Institutions holding 116 223 303
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.4% +15.8% +6.1%
Institutions buying 75 133 185
Institutions selling 29 55 80
Buyers to sellers 2.59 2.42 2.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECOSFLSTNG
ECO 1.00 0.60 0.65
SFL 0.60 1.00 0.52
STNG 0.65 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECO, SFL and STNG?

Scorpio Tankers (STNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) $3.23B, Sfl (SFL) $1.71B, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) $4.12B.

Which stock is cheaper, ECO, SFL and STNG?

Scorpio Tankers (STNG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 8.0x, Sfl (SFL) 26.3x, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) 5.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) is cheapest (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 5.3x, Sfl (SFL) 23.1x, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) 7.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) +105.2%, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) +32.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Scorpio Tankers (STNG) has the highest net margin (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 56.9%, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) 67.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) returned the most: Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) +179.0%, Sfl (SFL) +80.7%, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) +42.0%. Over five years, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) compounded fastest (Sfl (SFL) +9.6%/yr, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) +39.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sfl (SFL) has been the steadiest (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 46.0%, Sfl (SFL) 31.1%, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) 36.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECO, SFL and STNG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Scorpio Tankers (STNG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.