ECO vs SFL vs INSW Stock Comparison

Okeanis Eco Tankers, Sfl and International Seaways Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
$99.03 +25.3% 1M +195.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.51B
P/E
8.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$706.47M
Div. yield
9.64%
Marine Shipping Industrials
4 wins
SFL SFL Corp Ltd.
$12.78 -0.5% 1M +75.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.85B
P/E
26.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
6.57%
Marine Shipping Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

International Seaways leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (International Seaways 6, Okeanis Eco Tankers 4, Sfl 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECOSFLINSWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.51B $1.85B $5.54B INSW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.0x 26.2x 7.1x INSW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.6x 23.2x 6.4x ECO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +105.2% — +57.4% ECO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 56.9% — 62.0% INSW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 28.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 6.1x 0.2x INSW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 9.64% 6.57% 7.21% ECO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +195.2% +75.1% +125.3% ECO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +10.1%/yr +44.9%/yr INSW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.4% 30.9% 40.0% SFL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 45/100 82/100 INSW

Percentile Scorecard

ECOSFLINSW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECOSFLINSW
Valuation 42 #80 of 136 30 #95 of 136 46 #74 of 136
Growth 100 #1 of 122 56 #54 of 122 80 #25 of 122
Profitability 99 #2 of 116 – 97 #4 of 116
Financial Health 70 #43 of 143 6 #134 of 143 90 #15 of 143
Shareholder Returns 96 #4 of 81 89 #10 of 81 95 #5 of 81
Overall 81 45 82
  • ECO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • SFL ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • INSW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECOSFLINSWSPY
1 month +25.3%-0.5%+3.2% +0.9%
3 months +69.6%+5.4%+18.2% +5.9%
6 months +82.5%+12.7%+37.7% +8.5%
Year to date +192.6%+63.6%+130.3% +13.3%
1 year +195.2%+75.1%+125.3% +12.4%
3 years +260.2%+18.2%+127.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year +53.3%+5.7%+31.5% +23.5%
5 years —+61.6%+537.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+10.1%+44.9% +11.0%
10 years —+0.1%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —+0.0%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureECOSFLINSWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.4%30.9%40.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.2%29.1%37.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.290.370.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 4.212.433.13 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.0%-52.6%-55.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.3%-7.0%-10.5% -0.9%
52-week high $99.28$13.74$125.00 $779.14
52-week low $31.96$7.19$46.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECOSFLINSW
P/E now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 16.1x 26.2xmedian 16.1x 7.1xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 0.9x —median 0.9x 4.4xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 8.6x 11.1xmedian 8.6x 5.9xmedian 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 11.6x —median 11.6x 20.6xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 1.2x 1.8xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.80 -1.45median 0.80 1.30median 0.80

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECOSFLINSW
Revenue $706.47M – $1.26B
Gross profit $657.71M – –
Operating income $440.43M – $806.76M
Net income $402.14M $64.88M $779.12M
Free cash flow $360.91M – $269.32M
EPS (diluted) $12.34 $0.49 $15.62
Cash & equivalents $222.59M $113.10M $159.40M
Total debt $2.67B $2.38B $645.62M
Shares (diluted) 32.58M 133.06M 49.86M
Enterprise value $2.99B -$144.28B $4.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECOSFLINSW
P/E 8.0x 26.2x 7.1x
P/FCF 9.7x – 20.6x
P/Operating cash flow 9.7x – 8.7x
P/S 5.0x – 4.4x
P/B 4.0x 1.8x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 4.0x 1.8x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x 11.1x 5.9x
EV/EBIT 9.1x 29.1x 7.2x
EV/Revenue 5.7x – 4.6x
EV/FCF 11.1x – 21.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.1x – 9.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.45 1.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECOSFLINSW
Revenue growth (1Y) 105.2% – 57.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 2.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 118.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 288.4% – 193.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 4.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 498.6% 82.4% 226.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -18.9% 5.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 491.6% 78.2% 223.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -18.0% 5.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 316.0% – 67.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -2.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 316.0% – 34.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -14.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECOSFLINSW
Gross margin 93.1% – –
EBITDA margin 69.0% – 77.6%
Operating margin 62.3% – 64.2%
Pretax margin 67.0% – 61.4%
Net margin 56.9% – 62.0%
FCF margin 51.1% – 21.4%
Operating cash flow margin 51.1% – 50.4%
Return on equity 50.2% – 34.6%
Return on assets 26.0% – 26.2%
Return on invested capital – – 28.3%
Return on capital employed 30.3% – 28.7%
Asset turnover 0.5x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECOSFLINSW
Debt / assets 43.8% 67.8% 21.4%
Debt / equity 0.8x 2.3x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 6.1x 0.2x
Debt / FCF 2.0x – 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 46.8% 70.6% 25.0%
Equity / assets 53.2% 29.4% 75.0%
Interest coverage – – 19.7x
Current ratio 4.4x 0.4x 5.9x
Quick ratio 3.8x 0.4x 7.3x
Cash ratio 2.3x 0.2x 3.1x
Altman Z-score 4.81 – 6.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECOSFLINSW
Dividend yield 9.6% 6.6% 7.2%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 9.6% 6.6% 7.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECOSFLINSW
Forward P/E 5.6xFY2026 23.2xFY2026 6.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.61FY2026 $0.55FY2026 $17.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +367.1%FY2026 +450.0%FY2026 +223.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -49.7% +76.4% -35.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $912.99MFY2026 $691.35MFY2026 $1.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +244.0%FY2026 -5.7%FY2026 +64.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -35.5% +19.5% -10.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECOSFLINSW
Held by institutions 29.9% 43.5% 81.7%
Institutions holding 116 223 364
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.4% +15.8% +5.2%
Institutions buying 75 133 228
Institutions selling 29 55 86
Buyers to sellers 2.59 2.42 2.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECOSFLINSW
ECO 1.00 0.60 0.73
SFL 0.60 1.00 0.63
INSW 0.73 0.63 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECO, SFL and INSW?

International Seaways (INSW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) $3.51B, Sfl (SFL) $1.85B, International Seaways (INSW) $5.54B.

Which stock is cheaper, ECO, SFL and INSW?

International Seaways (INSW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 8.0x, Sfl (SFL) 26.2x, International Seaways (INSW) 7.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) is cheapest (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 5.6x, Sfl (SFL) 23.2x, International Seaways (INSW) 6.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) +105.2%, International Seaways (INSW) +57.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

International Seaways (INSW) has the highest net margin (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 56.9%, International Seaways (INSW) 62.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) returned the most: Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) +195.2%, Sfl (SFL) +75.1%, International Seaways (INSW) +125.3%. Over five years, International Seaways (INSW) compounded fastest (Sfl (SFL) +10.1%/yr, International Seaways (INSW) +44.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) has the highest dividend yield: Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 9.64%, Sfl (SFL) 6.57%, International Seaways (INSW) 7.21%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sfl (SFL) has been the steadiest (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 46.4%, Sfl (SFL) 30.9%, International Seaways (INSW) 40.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECO, SFL and INSW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, International Seaways (INSW) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.