ECL vs SNT vs VLTO Stock Comparison

Ecolab, Senstar Technologies and Veralto Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ECL Ecolab Inc.
$291.28 +4.1% 1M +4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$81.65B
P/E
39.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.37B
Div. yield
1.00%
Water Treatment Industrials
6 wins
VLTO Veralto Corp
$103.18 +6.2% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$25.20B
P/E
25.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.70B
Div. yield
0.50%
Water Treatment Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ecolab leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ecolab 6, Veralto 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECLSNTVLTOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $81.65B $36.40M $25.20B ECL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.3x 74.0x 25.6x VLTO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 36.9x — 22.7x VLTO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.3% -3.2% +6.2% ECL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 1.3% 17.3% VLTO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.7% 17.4% VLTO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.00% 0.00% 0.50% ECL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +4.1% -67.9% -0.9% ECL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.7%/yr -16.9%/yr — ECL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.9% 59.0% 23.5% ECL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 50/100 74/100 VLTO

Percentile Scorecard

ECLSNTVLTO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECLSNTVLTO
Valuation 35 #14 of 21 72 #32 of 112 80 #5 of 21
Growth 83 #4 of 19 3 #93 of 96 72 #6 of 19
Profitability 81 #4 of 17 36 #59 of 91 100 #1 of 17
Financial Health 19 #18 of 22 89 #15 of 125 52 #11 of 22
Shareholder Returns – – 67 #4 of 10
Overall 55 50 74
  • ECL ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • VLTO ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECLSNTVLTOSPY
1 month +4.1%-3.1%+6.2% -0.2%
3 months +2.8%-10.9%+4.7% +3.9%
6 months +9.1%-44.5%+20.5% +8.2%
Year to date +11.0%-67.7%+3.4% +12.9%
1 year +4.1%-67.9%-0.9% +12.3%
3 years +85.0%+36.8%+51.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +22.8%+11.0%+14.9% +23.3%
5 years +31.8%-60.3%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +5.7%-16.9%— +10.9%
10 years +153.4%-65.2%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.7%-10.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureECLSNTVLTOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.9%59.0%23.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 22.0%60.6%22.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.480.890.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.19-1.15-0.04 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.3%-74.7%-27.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.5%-68.2%-1.6% -1.2%
52-week high $308.35$4.91$104.87 $779.14
52-week low $245.73$1.34$82.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECLSNTVLTO
P/E now vs peer median 39.3xmedian 25.6x 74.0xmedian 21.2x 25.6xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 2.4x 1.0xmedian 0.9x 4.4xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.7x —median 11.9x 19.1xmedian 16.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 41.5xmedian 23.6x —median 13.7x 24.1xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 2.0x 0.9xmedian 2.4x 8.1xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 1.98median 1.68 —median 1.00 5.71median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECLSNTVLTO
Revenue $17.37B $36.80M $5.70B
Gross profit – $23.34M $3.43B
Operating income $2.90B $729.00K $1.30B
Net income – $378.00K $988.00M
Free cash flow – – $1.05B
R&D – $3.98M $276.00M
EPS (diluted) $7.38 $0.02 $4.02
Cash & equivalents $722.30M $7.88M $2.12B
Total debt – $1.14M $3.38B
Shares (diluted) 282.20M 23.46M 245.80M
Enterprise value $81.68B -$26.32M $17.84B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECLSNTVLTO
P/E 39.3x 74.0x 25.6x
P/FCF 41.5x – 24.1x
P/Operating cash flow – – 22.8x
P/S 4.7x 1.0x 4.4x
P/B 7.8x 0.9x 8.1x
P/Tangible book 15.2x 0.9x 11.1x
EV/EBITDA – – 19.1x
EV/EBIT – 39.5x 20.4x
EV/Revenue 4.7x 0.8x 4.6x
EV/FCF – – 25.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 24.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.98 – 5.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECLSNTVLTO
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.3% -3.2% 6.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.9% – 4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -7.5% 6.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 6.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.3% -86.3% 3.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.2% – 3.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – -92.6% 10.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 4.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.1% -90.5% 12.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.8% – 4.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 9.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 11.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECLSNTVLTO
Gross margin – 63.4% 60.2%
EBITDA margin – – 24.4%
Operating margin – 2.0% 22.7%
Pretax margin – 2.4% 21.2%
Net margin – 1.3% 17.3%
FCF margin – – 18.4%
Operating cash flow margin – – 19.4%
Return on equity 20.4% 0.9% 32.4%
Return on assets 6.9% 0.7% 12.2%
Return on invested capital – 0.7% 17.4%
Return on capital employed – 1.6% 21.4%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECLSNTVLTO
Debt / assets – 0.8% 39.5%
Debt / equity – 0.0x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.9x
Debt / FCF – – 3.2x
Liabilities / assets 66.4% 20.6% 63.8%
Equity / assets 33.6% 79.4% 36.2%
Interest coverage – – 14.1x
Current ratio 1.1x 3.6x 1.8x
Quick ratio – 2.2x 1.5x
Cash ratio – 1.0x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 3.12 4.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECLSNTVLTO
Dividend yield 1.0% – 0.5%
Net buyback yield – – 1.7%
Shareholder yield 1.0% 0.0% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECLSNTVLTO
Forward P/E 36.9xFY2026 – 22.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.90FY2026 – $4.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +4.9%FY2026 – +16.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.2% – +7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.26BFY2026 – $5.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.3%FY2026 – +3.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.4% – +16.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECLSNTVLTO
Held by institutions 80.0% – 96.1%
Institutions holding 1,710 – 974
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% – +3.3%
Institutions buying 762 – 399
Institutions selling 679 – 384
Buyers to sellers 1.12 – 1.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECLSNTVLTO
ECL 1.00 0.00 0.33
SNT 0.00 1.00 0.06
VLTO 0.33 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECL, SNT and VLTO?

Ecolab (ECL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ecolab (ECL) $81.65B, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $36.40M, Veralto (VLTO) $25.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, ECL, SNT and VLTO?

Veralto (VLTO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ecolab (ECL) 39.3x, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 74.0x, Veralto (VLTO) 25.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Veralto (VLTO) is cheapest (Ecolab (ECL) 36.9x, Veralto (VLTO) 22.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ecolab (ECL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ecolab (ECL) +9.3%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%, Veralto (VLTO) +6.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Veralto (VLTO) has the highest net margin (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%, Veralto (VLTO) 17.3%). On return on invested capital, Veralto (VLTO) leads (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.7%, Veralto (VLTO) 17.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ecolab (ECL) returned the most: Ecolab (ECL) +4.1%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -67.9%, Veralto (VLTO) -0.9%. Over five years, Ecolab (ECL) compounded fastest (Ecolab (ECL) +5.7%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -16.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ecolab (ECL) has the highest dividend yield: Ecolab (ECL) 1.00%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.00%, Veralto (VLTO) 0.50%. Senstar Technologies (SNT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ecolab (ECL) has been the steadiest (Ecolab (ECL) 21.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%, Veralto (VLTO) 23.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECL, SNT and VLTO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ecolab (ECL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.