ECHO vs TV vs LUNR Stock Comparison

EchoStar, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B and Intuitive Machines Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ECHO EchoStar CORP
$89.08 -3.9% 1M +22.0% 1Y
Market cap
$25.89B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.65B
Div. yield
–
Satellite Communications Communication Services
4 wins
TV Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.
$2.36 -2.9% 1M -2.1% 1Y
Market cap
$143.89B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.23B
Div. yield
–
Broadband and Cable Communication Services
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Grupo Televisa, S.A.B 5, EchoStar 4, Intuitive Machines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECHOTVLUNRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.89B $143.89B $1.70B TV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.6x -291.7x -12.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 3.8x 13.1x — ECHO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.2% +5.5% +116.9% LUNR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -38.7% -15.3% -26.8% TV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -35.4% 2.9% -560.6% TV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.1x 64.6x 0.3x ECHO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +22.0% -2.1% -14.4% ECHO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.9%/yr -26.9%/yr — ECHO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.1% 39.1% 109.9% TV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 33/100 25/100 TV

Percentile Scorecard

ECHOTVLUNR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECHOTVLUNR
Valuation 15 #42 of 49 4 #47 of 49 22 #78 of 100
Growth 11 #41 of 46 20 #37 of 46 27 #71 of 97
Profitability 13 #40 of 46 33 #31 of 46 26 #71 of 96
Financial Health 51 #25 of 50 76 #13 of 50 23 #82 of 106
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 23 33 25
  • ECHO ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • TV ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • LUNR ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECHOTVLUNRSPY
1 month -3.9%-2.9%-31.0% -1.0%
3 months +1.4%-14.5%-18.6% +2.9%
6 months -24.2%-23.4%-58.8% +6.4%
Year to date -18.0%-18.9%-35.2% +11.4%
1 year +22.0%-2.1%-14.4% +13.1%
3 years +538.1%-1.3%+267.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +85.6%-0.4%+54.4% +21.5%
5 years +268.9%-79.1%— +67.7%
5 years, per year +29.9%-26.9%— +10.9%
10 years +135.8%-90.9%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +9.0%-21.4%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureECHOTVLUNRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.1%39.1%109.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.8%39.3%100.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.580.733.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.41-0.05-0.13 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.0%-86.3%-97.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.2%-31.4%-77.0% -2.5%
52-week high $141.80$3.44$45.70 $779.14
52-week low $66.93$2.21$8.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECHOTVLUNR
P/E now vs peer median -4.6xmedian 11.6x -300.0xmedian 11.6x -13.0xmedian 26.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.1x 45.5xmedian 1.1x 4.8xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 6.9x 4,188xmedian 6.9x -22.7xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -35.6xmedian 5.6x —median 5.6x -12.6xmedian 24.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.3x 23.0xmedian 1.3x -8.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.12median 0.24 9.75median 0.24 0.31median 0.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECHOTVLUNR
Revenue $14.65B $3.23B $490.12M
Gross profit $6.18B $1.78B $83.23M
Operating income -$16.52B $307.39M -$134.85M
Net income -$5.68B -$116.03M -$184.98M
Free cash flow -$725.18M – -$187.75M
R&D – – $14.69M
EPS (diluted) $-16.13 $-0.01 $-0.81
Cash & equivalents $439.99M $1.70B $367.40M
Total debt $24.26B $14.34B $336.35M
Shares (diluted) 351.62M 68.12B 162.17M
Enterprise value $16.98B $135.62B -$107.31M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECHOTVLUNR
P/E -4.6x -300.0x -13.0x
P/FCF -35.6x – -12.6x
P/Operating cash flow -302.9x – -18.8x
P/S 1.8x 45.5x 4.8x
P/B 1.8x 23.0x -8.2x
P/Tangible book 4.7x 29.5x -4.0x
EV/EBITDA -2.7x 4,188x -22.7x
EV/EBIT -2.6x 485.2x -17.4x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 46.2x 4.8x
EV/FCF -59.0x – -12.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -501.4x – -18.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.12 9.75 0.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECHOTVLUNR
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.2% 5.5% 116.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.4% -11.8% 78.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.5% -37.1% 22,840%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.0% -18.9% 250.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3,046% 255.7% -104.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -135.0% 5.3% -65.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,685% 68.3% 37.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -69.9% -27.1% -267.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,371% -18.4% 60.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -39.5% -30.8% -41.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -115.9% – -540.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.4% – -220.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -4.6% – -366.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -60.1% – -75.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECHOTVLUNR
Gross margin 42.1% 55.2% 17.0%
EBITDA margin -106.3% 1.1% -21.0%
Operating margin -112.7% 9.5% -27.5%
Pretax margin -58.8% 8.3% -36.9%
Net margin -38.7% -15.3% -26.8%
FCF margin -4.9% – -38.3%
Operating cash flow margin -0.6% – -25.8%
Return on equity -57.2% -1.9% –
Return on assets -14.1% -0.9% -10.3%
Return on invested capital -35.4% 2.9% -560.6%
Return on capital employed -45.1% 2.7% -9.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x – 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – 4.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECHOTVLUNR
Debt / assets 44.2% 34.8% 17.8%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.7x -1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.1x 64.6x 0.3x
Debt / FCF -24.0x – -1.8x
Liabilities / assets 64.0% 52.7% 115.4%
Equity / assets 36.0% 47.3% -15.4%
Interest coverage – 0.7x -10.0x
Current ratio 5.2x 2.4x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.8x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.5x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 0.29 13.50 0.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECHOTVLUNR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECHOTVLUNR
Forward P/E 3.8xFY2026 13.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $23.27FY2026 $0.18FY2026 $-0.63FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -86.5% +38.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.35BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026 $951.52MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -11.0%FY2026 -9.0%FY2026 +353.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.6% -4.0% +11.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECHOTVLUNR
Held by institutions 0.0% 0.2% 63.2%
Institutions holding 1 106 328
Change in shares held, QoQ – -4.9% +34.5%
Institutions buying 1 44 223
Institutions selling 0 33 71
Buyers to sellers – 1.33 3.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECHOTVLUNR
ECHO 1.00 0.14 0.47
TV 0.14 1.00 0.10
LUNR 0.47 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECHO, TV and LUNR?

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) is the largest by market capitalisation: EchoStar (ECHO) $25.89B, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) $143.89B, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) $1.70B.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Machines (LUNR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: EchoStar (ECHO) -5.2%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) +5.5%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) +116.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) has the highest net margin (EchoStar (ECHO) -38.7%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -15.3%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -26.8%). On return on invested capital, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) leads (EchoStar (ECHO) -35.4%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 2.9%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -560.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year EchoStar (ECHO) returned the most: EchoStar (ECHO) +22.0%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -2.1%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -14.4%. Over five years, EchoStar (ECHO) compounded fastest (EchoStar (ECHO) +29.9%/yr, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -26.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) has been the steadiest (EchoStar (ECHO) 54.1%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 39.1%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) 109.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECHO, TV and LUNR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.