ECHO vs AMXOF vs LUNR Stock Comparison

EchoStar, America Movil Sab De Cv and Intuitive Machines Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ECHO EchoStar CORP
$98.62 +0.4% 1M +34.2% 1Y
Market cap
$26.23B
P/E
2.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.17B
Div. yield
–
Satellite Communications Communication Services
6 wins
AMXOF America Movil Sab De Cv/
$1.25 +26.3% 1M +10.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.77B
P/E
0.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$68.86B
Div. yield
42.40%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

EchoStar leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (EchoStar 6, America Movil Sab De Cv 4, Intuitive Machines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECHOAMXOFLUNRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $26.23B $3.77B $1.41B ECHO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.7x 0.6x -10.8x AMXOF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.2x 0.7x — AMXOF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -19.8% +15.6% +116.9% LUNR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 81.3% 9.5% -26.8% ECHO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.8% — -560.6% ECHO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -4.7x — 0.3x ECHO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 42.40% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +34.2% +10.6% -4.5% ECHO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +30.4%/yr +4.6%/yr — ECHO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.4% 45.5% 110.3% AMXOF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 90/100 25/100 AMXOF

Percentile Scorecard

ECHOAMXOFLUNR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECHOAMXOFLUNR
Valuation 31 #34 of 49 – 23 #78 of 101
Growth 37 #30 of 47 96 #3 of 47 28 #71 of 98
Profitability 51 #23 of 46 91 #5 of 46 26 #72 of 97
Financial Health 92 #5 of 49 – 23 #83 of 107
Shareholder Returns – 83 #7 of 36 –
Overall 53 90 25
  • ECHO ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • AMXOF ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • LUNR ranked among 108 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECHOAMXOFLUNRSPY
1 month +0.4%+26.3%-30.5% -1.0%
3 months +12.4%-2.3%-29.0% -0.4%
6 months -21.6%+1.6%-62.3% +4.5%
Year to date -9.3%+21.4%-38.8% +12.4%
1 year +34.2%+10.6%-4.5% +13.6%
3 years +538.7%+38.9%+191.2% +76.4%
3 years, per year +85.6%+11.6%+42.8% +20.8%
5 years +277.0%+25.0%— +63.7%
5 years, per year +30.4%+4.6%— +10.4%
10 years +168.2%+104.9%— +267.7%
10 years, per year +10.4%+7.4%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureECHOAMXOFLUNRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.4%45.5%110.3% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.0%97.0%101.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.500.073.65 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.630.23-0.04 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.0%-83.6%-97.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.5%-11.3%-78.3% -1.6%
52-week high $141.80$1.41$45.70 $779.14
52-week low $66.93$0.99$8.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECHOAMXOFLUNR
P/E now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 11.7x 0.6xmedian 11.7x -12.3xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.1x 0.1xmedian 1.1x 4.6xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 7.0x 0.0xmedian 7.0x -21.5xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -53.8xmedian 5.3x 0.2xmedian 5.3x -11.9xmedian 26.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x -7.7xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.13median 0.24 0.13median 0.24 0.30median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECHOAMXOFLUNR
Revenue $12.17B $68.86B $490.12M
Gross profit $5.58B $50.11B $83.23M
Operating income $273.80M $35.97B -$134.85M
Net income $9.88B $27.02B -$184.98M
Free cash flow -$532.75M $15.71B -$187.75M
R&D – – $14.69M
EPS (diluted) $28.16 $1.65 $-0.81
Cash & equivalents $13.44B – $367.40M
Total debt $9.66B – $336.35M
Shares (diluted) 351.19M 3.96B 162.17M
Enterprise value $7.26B -$24.01B -$391.92M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECHOAMXOFLUNR
P/E 2.9x 0.6x -12.3x
P/FCF -53.8x 0.2x -11.9x
P/Operating cash flow -341.5x 0.1x -17.7x
P/S 2.4x 0.1x 4.6x
P/B 1.7x – -7.7x
P/Tangible book 3.4x – -3.8x
EV/EBITDA 26.8x 0.0x -21.5x
EV/EBIT 89.0x 0.0x -16.4x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 0.0x 4.5x
EV/FCF -45.7x -0.1x -11.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -290.1x 0.0x -17.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.13 0.13 0.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECHOAMXOFLUNR
Revenue growth (1Y) -19.8% 15.6% 116.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -11.2% 13.7% 78.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.7% 25.8% 22,840%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 100.1% 19.7% 250.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 101.6% 202.6% -104.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.1% 55.0% -65.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 176.3% 23.5% 37.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 92.4% 86.9% -267.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 162.6% 47.1% 60.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.6% 4.6% -41.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -122.6% 92.2% -540.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.3% – -220.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 31.7% 92.8% -366.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -146.8% 88.2% -75.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECHOAMXOFLUNR
Gross margin 45.9% 72.8% 17.0%
EBITDA margin 7.5% 70.7% -21.0%
Operating margin 2.3% 52.2% -27.5%
Pretax margin 96.4% 47.1% -36.9%
Net margin 81.3% 9.5% -26.8%
FCF margin -4.4% 22.8% -38.3%
Operating cash flow margin -0.7% 38.0% -25.8%
Return on equity 63.4% – –
Return on assets 26.1% 6.4% -10.3%
Return on invested capital 0.8% – -560.6%
Return on capital employed 0.8% – -9.6%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.0x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% – 4.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECHOAMXOFLUNR
Debt / assets 26.6% – 17.8%
Debt / equity 0.6x – -1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -4.7x – 0.3x
Debt / FCF -18.1x – -1.8x
Liabilities / assets 53.2% – 115.4%
Equity / assets 46.8% – -15.4%
Interest coverage – 10.4x -10.0x
Current ratio 10.2x – 1.7x
Quick ratio 9.8x – 1.3x
Cash ratio 9.5x – 0.9x
Altman Z-score 2.01 – 0.62

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECHOAMXOFLUNR
Dividend yield – 42.4% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 42.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 6.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 11.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECHOAMXOFLUNR
Forward P/E 4.2xFY2026 0.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $23.27FY2026 $1.73FY2026 $-0.63FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +21.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -86.5% +13.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.35BFY2026 $53.98BFY2026 $951.52MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -11.0%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026 +353.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.6% +9.1% +11.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECHOAMXOFLUNR
Held by institutions 57.5% – 63.2%
Institutions holding 704 – 328
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% – +34.5%
Institutions buying 423 – 223
Institutions selling 217 – 71
Buyers to sellers 1.95 – 3.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECHOAMXOFLUNR
ECHO 1.00 -0.04 0.46
AMXOF -0.04 1.00 -0.04
LUNR 0.46 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECHO, AMXOF and LUNR?

EchoStar (ECHO) is the largest by market capitalisation: EchoStar (ECHO) $26.23B, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) $3.77B, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) $1.41B.

Which stock is cheaper, ECHO, AMXOF and LUNR?

America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (EchoStar (ECHO) 2.7x, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 0.6x, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -10.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) is cheapest (EchoStar (ECHO) 4.2x, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 0.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Machines (LUNR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: EchoStar (ECHO) -19.8%, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) +15.6%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) +116.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

EchoStar (ECHO) has the highest net margin (EchoStar (ECHO) 81.3%, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 9.5%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -26.8%). On return on invested capital, EchoStar (ECHO) leads (EchoStar (ECHO) 0.8%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -560.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year EchoStar (ECHO) returned the most: EchoStar (ECHO) +34.2%, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) +10.6%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -4.5%. Over five years, EchoStar (ECHO) compounded fastest (EchoStar (ECHO) +30.4%/yr, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) +4.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: EchoStar (ECHO) 0.00%, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 42.40%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) 0.00%. EchoStar (ECHO) and Intuitive Machines (LUNR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) has been the steadiest (EchoStar (ECHO) 54.4%, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 45.5%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) 110.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECHO, AMXOF and LUNR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, EchoStar (ECHO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.