ECG vs APG vs PWR Stock Comparison

Everus Construction, APi and Quanta Services Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
APG APi Group Corp
$40.80 +6.1% 1M +17.7% 1Y
Market cap
$17.63B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$8.44B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
1 win
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$578.87 -10.8% 1M +31.0% 1Y
Market cap
$86.99B
P/E
65.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$32.91B
Div. yield
0.08%
Utility Construction Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Everus Construction leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Everus Construction 7, Quanta Services 3, APi 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECGAPGPWRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.20B $17.63B $86.99B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.4x -71.2x 65.5x ECG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.7x 24.1x 36.5x ECG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +30.5% +14.1% +26.3% ECG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.0% -2.9% 4.0% ECG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 23.9% 6.7% 10.1% ECG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 2.8x 1.8x ECG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.08% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.0% +17.7% +31.0% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +23.1%/yr +36.7%/yr PWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.2% 30.0% 44.8% APG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 44/100 53/100 ECG

Percentile Scorecard

ECGAPGPWR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECGAPGPWR
Valuation 71 #16 of 52 27 #82 of 112 22 #41 of 52
Growth 81 #8 of 37 76 #24 of 96 72 #11 of 37
Profitability 83 #7 of 37 54 #42 of 91 75 #10 of 37
Financial Health 77 #14 of 57 46 #68 of 125 55 #26 of 57
Shareholder Returns – 17 #56 of 67 42 #16 of 27
Overall 78 44 53
  • ECG ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • APG ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECGAPGPWRSPY
1 month -12.9%+6.1%-10.8% -0.2%
3 months -13.1%+3.7%-1.6% +3.9%
6 months -25.5%-16.2%-8.3% +8.2%
Year to date +19.0%+6.6%+37.2% +12.9%
1 year +11.0%+17.7%+31.0% +12.3%
3 years —+140.4%+251.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+34.0%+52.0% +23.3%
5 years —+182.4%+376.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+23.1%+36.7% +10.9%
10 years ——+1,953.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+35.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureECGAPGPWRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.2%30.0%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.2%31.0%42.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.701.281.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.180.590.69 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.2%-49.6%-33.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.8%-17.4%-26.3% -1.2%
52-week high $169.16$49.40$785.24 $779.14
52-week low $80.42$34.31$413.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECGAPGPWR
P/E now vs peer median 20.4xmedian 26.7x -71.2xmedian 21.2x 65.5xmedian 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.8x 2.1xmedian 0.9x 2.6xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 13.1x 21.5xmedian 11.9x 30.2xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.8xmedian 23.0x 26.1xmedian 13.7x 38.0xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 2.4x 5.0xmedian 2.4x 8.9xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 1.02median 1.00 2.13median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECGAPGPWR
Revenue $4.27B $8.44B $32.91B
Gross profit $555.38M $2.65B $5.09B
Operating income $330.71M $605.00M $2.04B
Net income $254.46M $346.00M $1.35B
Free cash flow $250.37M $676.00M $2.29B
EPS (diluted) $4.97 $-0.57 $8.70
Cash & equivalents $176.70M $851.00M $506.43M
Total debt $274.50M $3.52B $6.10B
Shares (diluted) 51.22M 437.00M 152.44M
Enterprise value $4.41B $14.67B $85.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECGAPGPWR
P/E 20.4x -71.2x 65.5x
P/FCF 20.8x 26.1x 38.0x
P/Operating cash flow 16.2x 22.5x 27.4x
P/S 1.2x 2.1x 2.6x
P/B 6.7x 5.0x 8.9x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 9.9x 13.3x
EV/EBITDA 14.4x 21.5x 30.2x
EV/EBIT 16.0x 33.6x 45.5x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 2.4x 2.8x
EV/FCF 21.1x 30.0x 40.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.5x 26.0x 29.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.02 2.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECGAPGPWR
Revenue growth (1Y) 30.5% 14.1% 26.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 7.3% 21.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.9% 15.4% 29.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.3% 24.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 48.2% 24.7% 36.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 27.8% 28.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 53.5% 39.5% 36.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 40.8% 31.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 53.1% -272.3% 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -69.5% 30.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 67.2% 20.7% 59.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 24.3% 42.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 94.5% 18.8% 68.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.9% 47.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECGAPGPWR
Gross margin 13.0% 31.4% 15.5%
EBITDA margin 8.6% 11.2% 9.3%
Operating margin 7.8% 7.2% 6.2%
Pretax margin 7.7% 5.5% 5.3%
Net margin 6.0% -2.9% 4.0%
FCF margin 5.9% 8.0% 7.0%
Operating cash flow margin 7.5% 9.3% 9.7%
Return on equity 32.6% 9.9% 14.3%
Return on assets 12.2% 3.7% 5.0%
Return on invested capital 23.9% 6.7% 10.1%
Return on capital employed 32.3% 8.7% 12.6%
Asset turnover 2.2x 0.9x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 2.3x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.5% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECGAPGPWR
Debt / assets 13.3% 35.4% 21.6%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.0x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 2.8x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 1.1x 5.2x 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 64.7% 65.6%
Equity / assets 37.6% 35.3% 34.4%
Interest coverage 16.8x 4.3x 6.9x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.4x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.5x 1.3x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 5.78 2.91 4.62

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECGAPGPWR
Dividend yield – – 0.1%
Net buyback yield – 0.4% –
Shareholder yield – 0.4% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 4.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 2.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 10.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 12.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECGAPGPWR
Forward P/E 19.7xFY2026 24.1xFY2026 36.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.16FY2026 $1.69FY2026 $15.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.6%FY2026 +14.2%FY2026 +47.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.5% +16.0% +27.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.57BFY2026 $9.25BFY2026 $40.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.8%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026 +43.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.6% +8.4% +9.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECGAPGPWR
Held by institutions 84.9% 84.5% 88.9%
Institutions holding 537 581 1,920
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.3% +5.1% +13.5%
Institutions buying 262 306 972
Institutions selling 162 205 704
Buyers to sellers 1.62 1.49 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECGAPGPWR
ECG 1.00 0.48 0.72
APG 0.48 1.00 0.47
PWR 0.72 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECG, APG and PWR?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Everus Construction (ECG) $5.20B, APi (APG) $17.63B, Quanta Services (PWR) $86.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, ECG, APG and PWR?

Everus Construction (ECG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Everus Construction (ECG) 20.4x, APi (APG) -71.2x, Quanta Services (PWR) 65.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Everus Construction (ECG) is cheapest (Everus Construction (ECG) 19.7x, APi (APG) 24.1x, Quanta Services (PWR) 36.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Everus Construction (ECG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Everus Construction (ECG) +30.5%, APi (APG) +14.1%, Quanta Services (PWR) +26.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Everus Construction (ECG) has the highest net margin (Everus Construction (ECG) 6.0%, APi (APG) -2.9%, Quanta Services (PWR) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, Everus Construction (ECG) leads (Everus Construction (ECG) 23.9%, APi (APG) 6.7%, Quanta Services (PWR) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: Everus Construction (ECG) +11.0%, APi (APG) +17.7%, Quanta Services (PWR) +31.0%. Over five years, Quanta Services (PWR) compounded fastest (APi (APG) +23.1%/yr, Quanta Services (PWR) +36.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Quanta Services (PWR) 0.08%. Everus Construction (ECG) and APi (APG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, APi (APG) has been the steadiest (Everus Construction (ECG) 62.2%, APi (APG) 30.0%, Quanta Services (PWR) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECG, APG and PWR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Everus Construction (ECG) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.