EAT vs MLCO vs RRR Stock Comparison

Brinker International, Melco Resorts & Entertainment and Red Rock Resorts Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EAT Brinker International, Inc
$196.66 -5.1% 1M +55.8% 1Y
Market cap
$9.63B
P/E
19.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.81B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
RRR Red Rock Resorts, Inc.
$49.76 -2.0% 1M -14.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.77B
P/E
16.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.00B
Div. yield
0.06%
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Melco Resorts & Entertainment leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Melco Resorts & Entertainment 5, Brinker International 4, Red Rock Resorts 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEATMLCORRRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.63B $1.48B $2.77B EAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.8x 6.3x 16.4x MLCO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 10.7x 19.3x MLCO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.9% +5.2% +0.9% EAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.4% 5.0% 8.4% RRR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 59.4% 231.9% 12.7% MLCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x -2.9x 4.4x MLCO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.06% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +55.8% -55.6% -14.9% EAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.8%/yr -19.6%/yr -1.9%/yr EAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.6% 39.4% 35.1% RRR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 85/100 50/100 MLCO

Percentile Scorecard

EATMLCORRR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEATMLCORRR
Valuation 61 #20 of 50 100 #1 of 44 33 #30 of 44
Growth 94 #4 of 47 91 #5 of 43 50 #22 of 43
Profitability 93 #4 of 46 88 #6 of 41 90 #5 of 41
Financial Health 54 #24 of 51 61 #19 of 47 26 #35 of 47
Shareholder Returns 88 #5 of 33 – 50 #15 of 29
Overall 78 85 50
  • EAT ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • MLCO ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • RRR ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEATMLCORRRSPY
1 month -5.1%-20.7%-2.0% -0.2%
3 months -0.9%-33.5%-24.8% +3.9%
6 months +52.3%-32.4%-10.4% +8.2%
Year to date +37.0%-50.5%-19.7% +12.9%
1 year +55.8%-55.6%-14.9% +12.3%
3 years +500.9%-55.3%+27.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +81.9%-23.6%+8.4% +23.3%
5 years +361.9%-66.3%-9.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +35.8%-19.6%-1.9% +10.9%
10 years +312.8%-77.9%+125.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +15.2%-14.0%+8.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEATMLCORRRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.6%39.4%35.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.3%46.9%38.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.770.670.52 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.12-1.41-0.42 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.7%-74.1%-42.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.6%-60.1%-26.0% -1.2%
52-week high $254.01$9.39$67.26 $779.14
52-week low $102.29$3.73$48.76 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEATMLCORRR
P/E now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 20.6x 6.4xmedian 17.0x 17.1xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 0.3xmedian 1.9x 2.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 13.3x 7.1xmedian 10.8x 11.1xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 17.3x 3.0xmedian 11.2x 27.1xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 18.7xmedian 3.1x 173.9xmedian 2.4x 17.9xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 1.07 0.19median 0.56 1.78median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEATMLCORRR
Revenue $5.81B $4.69B $2.00B
Gross profit $4.32B $4.54B $1.25B
Operating income $619.90M $477.81M $554.72M
Net income $487.00M $196.16M $320.78M
Free cash flow $557.50M $506.29M $193.01M
R&D – $4.78M –
EPS (diluted) $10.87 $0.59 $2.87
Cash & equivalents $110.00M $454.26M $136.45M
Total debt $448.00M $14.51M $3.58B
Shares (diluted) 44.80M 400.63M 58.81M
Enterprise value $9.41B -$1.45B $2.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEATMLCORRR
P/E 17.6x 6.4x 17.1x
P/FCF 14.9x 3.0x 27.1x
P/Operating cash flow 10.5x 1.9x 8.4x
P/S 1.4x 0.3x 2.6x
P/B 18.7x 173.9x 17.9x
P/Tangible book 19.4x -8.7x 24.6x
EV/EBITDA 10.3x 7.1x 11.1x
EV/EBIT 13.9x 2.3x 15.6x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 0.2x 4.3x
EV/FCF 15.5x 2.1x 44.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.9x 1.4x 13.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 0.19 1.78

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEATMLCORRR
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.9% 5.2% 0.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 35.8% 5.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.1% 5.4% 1.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.1% 35.9% 4.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.1% 24.6% -6.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 62.5% 53.5% -4.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 27.1% 914.5% -4.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 68.1% 32.2% -9.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.8% 347.7% 67.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.3% 34.2% 9.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.3% 3.7% 10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.5% 84.2% 7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 34.8% -3.5% -34.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 98.4% 38.1% 37.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEATMLCORRR
Gross margin 74.4% 96.6% 62.1%
EBITDA margin 14.4% 3.3% 38.8%
Operating margin 10.7% 10.2% 27.7%
Pretax margin 10.0% 4.0% 18.2%
Net margin 8.4% 5.0% 8.4%
FCF margin 9.6% 10.8% 9.6%
Operating cash flow margin 13.6% 16.9% 31.1%
Return on equity 114.6% 1,233% 118.9%
Return on assets 17.4% 3.2% 7.5%
Return on invested capital 59.4% 231.9% 12.7%
Return on capital employed 29.3% 9.4% 14.3%
Asset turnover 2.1x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 4.0x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – 1.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEATMLCORRR
Debt / assets 15.9% 0.2% 82.0%
Debt / equity 1.0x 1.7x 12.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x -2.9x 4.4x
Debt / FCF 0.8x 0.0x 18.5x
Liabilities / assets 84.2% 99.9% 93.3%
Equity / assets 15.8% 0.1% 6.7%
Interest coverage 15.3x 1.4x 2.8x
Current ratio 0.5x 1.0x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.3x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 5.07 0.72 1.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEATMLCORRR
Dividend yield – – 4.1%
Net buyback yield 5.3% – 1.7%
Shareholder yield 5.3% 0.0% 5.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 55.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 91.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 19.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 18.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEATMLCORRR
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2027 10.7xFY2026 19.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.84FY2027 $0.35FY2026 $2.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +28.9%FY2027 -23.9%FY2026 +41.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -0.8% +57.1% +20.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.99BFY2027 $5.39BFY2026 $1.96BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.1%FY2027 +4.4%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.2% -8.0% +2.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEATMLCORRR
Held by institutions 100.0% 25.7% 90.4%
Institutions holding 507 165 245
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% -6.1% +2.8%
Institutions buying 279 84 122
Institutions selling 160 49 95
Buyers to sellers 1.74 1.71 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EATMLCORRR
EAT 1.00 0.20 0.26
MLCO 0.20 1.00 0.23
RRR 0.26 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EAT, MLCO and RRR?

Brinker International (EAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brinker International (EAT) $9.63B, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) $1.48B, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) $2.77B.

Which stock is cheaper, EAT, MLCO and RRR?

Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brinker International (EAT) 19.8x, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) 6.3x, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 16.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) is cheapest (Brinker International (EAT) 14.2x, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) 10.7x, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 19.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Brinker International (EAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brinker International (EAT) +7.9%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) +5.2%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) +0.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Red Rock Resorts (RRR) has the highest net margin (Brinker International (EAT) 8.4%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) 5.0%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 8.4%). On return on invested capital, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) leads (Brinker International (EAT) 59.4%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) 231.9%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brinker International (EAT) returned the most: Brinker International (EAT) +55.8%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) -55.6%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) -14.9%. Over five years, Brinker International (EAT) compounded fastest (Brinker International (EAT) +35.8%/yr, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) -19.6%/yr, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) -1.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brinker International (EAT) 0.00%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) 0.00%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 0.06%. Brinker International (EAT) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) has been the steadiest (Brinker International (EAT) 49.6%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) 39.4%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 35.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EAT, MLCO and RRR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.