EAT vs BJRI vs HDL Stock Comparison

Brinker International, BJs RESTAURANTS and Super Hi International Holding Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EAT Brinker International, Inc
$196.66 -5.1% 1M +55.8% 1Y
Market cap
$9.72B
P/E
20.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.81B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
BJRI BJs RESTAURANTS INC
$57.46 -4.4% 1M +82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.27B
P/E
31.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.43B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Brinker International leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Brinker International 7, Super Hi International Holding 2, BJs RESTAURANTS 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEATBJRIHDLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.72B $1.27B $643.80M EAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.0x 31.1x 56.7x EAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 23.0x 18.3x EAT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.9% +3.5% +10.5% HDL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.4% 2.9% 1.2% EAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 59.4% 9.0% — EAT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.2x — BJRI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +55.8% +82.4% -43.2% BJRI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.8%/yr +11.6%/yr — EAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.6% 43.4% 39.3% HDL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 59/100 59/100 EAT

Percentile Scorecard

EATBJRIHDL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEATBJRIHDL
Valuation 61 #20 of 50 55 #23 of 50 80 #11 of 50
Growth 94 #4 of 47 57 #21 of 47 24 #36 of 47
Profitability 93 #4 of 46 53 #22 of 46 56 #21 of 46
Financial Health 54 #24 of 51 62 #20 of 51 76 #13 of 51
Shareholder Returns 88 #5 of 33 66 #12 of 33 –
Overall 78 59 59
  • EAT ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • BJRI ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • HDL ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEATBJRIHDLSPY
1 month -5.1%-4.4%-15.7% -0.2%
3 months -0.9%-16.7%-24.5% +3.9%
6 months +52.3%+54.0%-26.7% +8.2%
Year to date +37.0%+45.8%-38.4% +12.9%
1 year +55.8%+82.4%-43.2% +12.3%
3 years +500.9%+124.4%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +81.9%+30.9%— +23.3%
5 years +361.9%+73.3%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +35.8%+11.6%— +10.9%
10 years +312.8%+65.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +15.2%+5.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEATBJRIHDLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.6%43.4%39.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.3%38.9%50.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.770.780.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.121.90-1.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.7%-45.6%-66.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.6%-22.6%-46.0% -1.2%
52-week high $254.01$74.26$18.32 $779.14
52-week low $102.29$28.69$9.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEATBJRIHDL
P/E now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 20.6x 29.5xmedian 20.6x 56.7xmedian 20.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 1.2x 0.7xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 13.3x 10.2xmedian 13.3x -5.4xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 17.3x 26.5xmedian 17.3x 5.3xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 18.7xmedian 3.1x 3.1xmedian 3.1x —median 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 1.07 0.63median 1.07 —median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEATBJRIHDL
Revenue $5.81B $1.43B $888.78M
Gross profit $4.32B $1.07B –
Operating income $619.90M $39.21M –
Net income $487.00M $40.92M $10.19M
Free cash flow $557.50M $45.99M $120.84M
EPS (diluted) $10.87 $1.87 –
Cash & equivalents $110.00M $14.43M $266.40M
Total debt $448.00M $44.00M –
Shares (diluted) 44.80M 21.89M –
Enterprise value $9.51B $1.19B -$349.48M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEATBJRIHDL
P/E 17.6x 29.5x 56.7x
P/FCF 14.9x 26.5x 5.3x
P/Operating cash flow 10.5x 10.3x 5.3x
P/S 1.4x 0.8x 0.7x
P/B 18.7x 3.1x –
P/Tangible book 19.4x 3.1x –
EV/EBITDA 10.3x 10.2x -5.4x
EV/EBIT 13.9x 31.8x 25.9x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 0.9x 0.4x
EV/FCF 15.5x 27.1x 3.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.9x 10.6x 3.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 0.63 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEATBJRIHDL
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.9% 3.5% 10.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 2.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.1% 3.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.1% 3.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.1% 36.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 62.5% 53.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 27.1% 48.8% -81.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 68.1% 42.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 30.8% 56.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.3% 47.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.3% -6.5% 2.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.5% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 34.8% -13.6% 2.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 98.4% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEATBJRIHDL
Gross margin 74.4% 74.5% –
EBITDA margin 14.4% 8.6% -7.9%
Operating margin 10.7% 2.7% –
Pretax margin 10.0% 2.7% 3.0%
Net margin 8.4% 2.9% 1.2%
FCF margin 9.6% 3.2% 13.6%
Operating cash flow margin 13.6% 8.2% 13.6%
Return on equity 114.6% 10.6% –
Return on assets 17.4% 4.1% –
Return on invested capital 59.4% 9.0% –
Return on capital employed 29.3% 4.8% –
Asset turnover 2.1x 1.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 2.9x 11.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEATBJRIHDL
Debt / assets 15.9% 4.4% –
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.2x –
Debt / FCF 0.8x 1.0x –
Liabilities / assets 84.2% 59.9% –
Equity / assets 15.8% 40.1% –
Interest coverage 15.3x – 1.2x
Current ratio 0.5x 0.3x –
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.2x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 5.07 3.10 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEATBJRIHDL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 5.3% 3.2% –
Shareholder yield 5.3% 3.2% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEATBJRIHDL
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2027 23.0xFY2026 18.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.84FY2027 $2.50FY2026 $0.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +28.9%FY2027 +10.6%FY2026 -10.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -0.8% +2.0% +44.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.99BFY2027 $1.49BFY2026 $891.81MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.1%FY2027 +6.4%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.2% +5.4% +13.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEATBJRIHDL
Held by institutions 100.0% 99.3% –
Institutions holding 507 194 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% +3.7% –
Institutions buying 279 99 –
Institutions selling 160 66 –
Buyers to sellers 1.74 1.50 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EATBJRIHDL
EAT 1.00 0.45 -0.05
BJRI 0.45 1.00 0.03
HDL -0.05 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EAT, BJRI and HDL?

Brinker International (EAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brinker International (EAT) $9.72B, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) $1.27B, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) $643.80M.

Which stock is cheaper, EAT, BJRI and HDL?

Brinker International (EAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brinker International (EAT) 20.0x, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) 31.1x, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 56.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brinker International (EAT) is cheapest (Brinker International (EAT) 14.2x, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) 23.0x, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 18.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Hi International Holding (HDL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brinker International (EAT) +7.9%, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) +3.5%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) +10.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brinker International (EAT) has the highest net margin (Brinker International (EAT) 8.4%, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) 2.9%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, Brinker International (EAT) leads (Brinker International (EAT) 59.4%, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) returned the most: Brinker International (EAT) +55.8%, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) +82.4%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) -43.2%. Over five years, Brinker International (EAT) compounded fastest (Brinker International (EAT) +35.8%/yr, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) +11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) has been the steadiest (Brinker International (EAT) 49.6%, BJs RESTAURANTS (BJRI) 43.4%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 39.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EAT, BJRI and HDL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brinker International (EAT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.