EAF vs MTX vs CMP Stock Comparison

Graftech International, Minerals Technologies and Compass Minerals International Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EAF Graftech International Ltd
$11.83 +6.9% 1M -13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$318.20M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$509.08M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
1 win
MTX Minerals Technologies Inc
$62.56 -6.6% 1M +10.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.15B
Div. yield
0.77%
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Compass Minerals International leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Compass Minerals International 5, Minerals Technologies 4, Graftech International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEAFMTXCMPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $318.20M $1.95B $962.62M MTX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.6x -29.0x 52.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.4x 26.7x MTX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% +4.1% +5.5% CMP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -38.4% -3.1% 1.4% CMP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -12.9% -0.9% 5.2% CMP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -23.1x 9.4x 2.9x EAF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.77% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.0% +10.0% +31.9% CMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -35.8%/yr -2.6%/yr -19.0%/yr MTX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 112.4% 25.3% 51.2% MTX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 48/100 53/100 CMP

Percentile Scorecard

EAFMTXCMP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEAFMTXCMP
Valuation 21 #128 of 162 80 #34 of 162 74 #43 of 162
Growth 7 #137 of 147 24 #112 of 147 64 #54 of 147
Profitability 24 #93 of 122 40 #74 of 122 59 #51 of 122
Financial Health 20 #131 of 164 16 #138 of 164 17 #136 of 164
Shareholder Returns 43 #62 of 107 82 #20 of 107 –
Overall 23 48 53
  • EAF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • MTX ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • CMP ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEAFMTXCMPSPY
1 month +6.9%-6.6%+1.4% -0.2%
3 months +54.4%-16.9%-22.7% +3.9%
6 months +31.3%-14.1%-12.4% +8.2%
Year to date -23.7%+2.6%+16.8% +12.9%
1 year -13.0%+10.0%+31.9% +12.3%
3 years -64.6%+17.9%-6.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -29.3%+5.7%-2.1% +23.3%
5 years -89.1%-12.2%-65.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -35.8%-2.6%-19.0% +10.9%
10 years —-5.6%-68.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-0.6%-10.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEAFMTXCMPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 112.4%25.3%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 128.7%24.4%53.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.990.631.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.120.400.62 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.1%-42.7%-89.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.3%-24.5%-31.6% -1.2%
52-week high $18.01$82.84$33.51 $779.14
52-week low $5.23$55.09$16.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEAFMTXCMP
P/E now vs peer median -1.6xmedian 13.3x -29.0xmedian 13.3x 52.6xmedian 13.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 3.2x 0.9xmedian 3.2x 0.7xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -30.1xmedian 7.3x 39.1xmedian 7.3x 7.2xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.0xmedian 14.7x 16.2xmedian 14.7x 12.4xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median -0.8xmedian 2.2x 1.2xmedian 2.2x 3.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.02median 0.31 0.73median 0.31 2.98median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEAFMTXCMP
Revenue $509.08M $2.15B $1.29B
Gross profit -$34.13M $526.40M $222.50M
Operating income -$107.10M -$28.70M $115.50M
Net income -$195.63M -$62.60M $18.40M
Free cash flow -$158.11M $120.30M $77.90M
R&D $6.05M $23.40M –
EPS (diluted) $-7.38 $-2.16 $0.44
Cash & equivalents $134.31M $342.20M $56.30M
Total debt $1.20B $958.90M $716.60M
Shares (diluted) 26.51M 31.10M 42.25M
Enterprise value -$220.15M $650.92M $725.82M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEAFMTXCMP
P/E -1.6x -29.0x 52.6x
P/FCF -2.0x 16.2x 12.4x
P/Operating cash flow -2.8x 8.5x 6.2x
P/S 0.6x 0.9x 0.7x
P/B -0.8x 1.2x 3.7x
P/Tangible book -0.8x 1.4x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA -30.1x 39.1x 7.2x
EV/EBIT -12.9x -89.2x 14.1x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 1.2x 1.3x
EV/FCF -8.8x 21.3x 20.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -12.3x 11.1x 10.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.02 0.73 2.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEAFMTXCMP
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% 4.1% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -11.4% 0.0% 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1,814% 0.4% 29.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -30.9% 4.2% -1.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -70.6% -138.2% 800.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -57.0% -29.1% 11.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.2% -1,198% 115.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -72.9% -37.8% 18.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.3% -3,351% 115.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -71.1% -39.7% 17.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -29.5% 21.9% -18.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -43.6% 14.9% 16.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -31.3% 35.6% -33.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -79.2% 23.6% 97.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEAFMTXCMP
Gross margin -6.7% 24.5% 17.2%
EBITDA margin -9.0% 3.0% 17.5%
Operating margin -21.0% -1.3% 8.9%
Pretax margin -36.8% -3.8% 3.2%
Net margin -38.4% -3.1% 1.4%
FCF margin -31.1% 5.6% 6.0%
Operating cash flow margin -22.2% 10.7% 12.1%
Return on equity – -3.8% 6.8%
Return on assets -18.9% -1.8% 1.4%
Return on invested capital -12.9% -0.9% 5.2%
Return on capital employed -12.1% -1.1% 10.4%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x -3.7x 8.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEAFMTXCMP
Debt / assets 117.4% 27.4% 52.9%
Debt / equity -3.1x 0.6x 2.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -23.1x 9.4x 2.9x
Debt / FCF -7.6x 8.0x 9.2x
Liabilities / assets 138.0% 54.9% 80.5%
Equity / assets -38.0% 45.1% 19.5%
Interest coverage -1.1x – 52.5x
Current ratio 3.5x 1.4x 2.0x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.9x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -0.84 2.25 1.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEAFMTXCMP
Dividend yield – 0.8% –
Net buyback yield -1.5% 1.2% –
Shareholder yield -1.5% 1.9% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -23.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 12.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 31.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEAFMTXCMP
Forward P/E – 10.4xFY2026 26.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-5.68FY2026 $6.03FY2026 $0.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +9.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +8.5% +51.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $483.99MFY2026 $2.33BFY2026 $1.21BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.0%FY2026 +12.3%FY2026 -2.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.5% +3.8% +12.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEAFMTXCMP
Held by institutions 41.3% 100.0% 91.8%
Institutions holding 90 292 230
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +2.6% -4.3%
Institutions buying 54 176 130
Institutions selling 22 69 56
Buyers to sellers 2.45 2.55 2.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EAFMTXCMP
EAF 1.00 0.17 0.24
MTX 0.17 1.00 0.25
CMP 0.24 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EAF, MTX and CMP?

Minerals Technologies (MTX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Graftech International (EAF) $318.20M, Minerals Technologies (MTX) $1.95B, Compass Minerals International (CMP) $962.62M.

Which company is growing faster?

Compass Minerals International (CMP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Graftech International (EAF) -2.5%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) +4.1%, Compass Minerals International (CMP) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Compass Minerals International (CMP) has the highest net margin (Graftech International (EAF) -38.4%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) -3.1%, Compass Minerals International (CMP) 1.4%). On return on invested capital, Compass Minerals International (CMP) leads (Graftech International (EAF) -12.9%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) -0.9%, Compass Minerals International (CMP) 5.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Compass Minerals International (CMP) returned the most: Graftech International (EAF) -13.0%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) +10.0%, Compass Minerals International (CMP) +31.9%. Over five years, Minerals Technologies (MTX) compounded fastest (Graftech International (EAF) -35.8%/yr, Minerals Technologies (MTX) -2.6%/yr, Compass Minerals International (CMP) -19.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Graftech International (EAF) 0.00%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) 0.77%, Compass Minerals International (CMP) 0.00%. Graftech International (EAF) and Compass Minerals International (CMP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Minerals Technologies (MTX) has been the steadiest (Graftech International (EAF) 112.4%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) 25.3%, Compass Minerals International (CMP) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EAF, MTX and CMP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Compass Minerals International (CMP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.