DSWL vs TTMI vs ASX Stock Comparison

Deswell Industries, Ttm Technologies and ASE Technology Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DSWL Deswell Industries Inc
$2.95 -4.5% 1M -16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$46.86M
P/E
4.4x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
10.17%
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$90.79 -26.9% 1M +53.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.57B
P/E
35.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.83B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

ASE Technology Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (ASE Technology Holding 5, Deswell Industries 4, Ttm Technologies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDSWLTTMIASXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $46.86M $9.57B $97.68B ASX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.4x 35.7x 48.8x DSWL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.2x 34.6x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +37.6% +18.2% TTMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 7.0% 8.5% ASX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.1% 11.1% ASX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.3x 1.1x ASX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 10.17% — 0.91% DSWL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.4% +53.3% +228.8% ASX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.8%/yr +47.0%/yr +43.9%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.2% 90.5% 58.3% DSWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 96/100 60/100 61/100 DSWL

Percentile Scorecard

DSWLTTMIASX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDSWLTTMIASX
Valuation 97 #4 of 111 62 #43 of 111 73 #26 of 94
Growth – 91 #11 of 108 80 #19 of 92
Profitability – 61 #41 of 104 69 #29 of 90
Financial Health 90 #13 of 115 27 #84 of 115 17 #82 of 99
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 78 – 64 #27 of 73
Overall 96 60 61
  • DSWL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ASX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDSWLTTMIASXSPY
1 month -4.5%-26.9%+0.3% +0.9%
3 months -8.7%-10.8%+39.5% +5.9%
6 months -13.0%-34.0%+43.6% +8.5%
Year to date -14.7%+31.6%+172.9% +13.3%
1 year -16.4%+53.3%+228.8% +12.4%
3 years +30.5%+688.1%+487.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +9.3%+99.1%+80.5% +23.5%
5 years -25.7%+585.7%+517.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -5.8%+47.0%+43.9% +11.0%
10 years +67.6%+571.0%+657.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year +5.3%+21.0%+22.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureDSWLTTMIASXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.2%90.5%58.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.0%97.7%62.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.243.822.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.380.593.93 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-66.6%-43.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.3%-59.0%-7.7% -0.9%
52-week high $4.06$221.47$47.62 $779.14
52-week low $2.91$58.45$13.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDSWLTTMIASX
P/E now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 33.5x 35.7xmedian 33.5x 48.8xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.8x 2.5xmedian 2.8x 4.3xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 19.6x 17.6xmedian 19.6x 22.2xmedian 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.9xmedian 29.8x 646.9xmedian 29.8x 8.1xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.9x 4.7xmedian 2.9x 8.0xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.10 0.16median 1.10 6.29median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDSWLTTMIASX
Revenue – $3.83B $22.92B
Gross profit – $850.77M $4.46B
Operating income – $424.51M $2.24B
Net income – $268.52M $2.65B
Free cash flow – $14.79M $12.11B
R&D – $32.31M $1.18B
EPS (diluted) – $2.49 $0.88
Cash & equivalents $23.06M $876.35M $2.86B
Total debt – $1.64B $31.57B
Shares (diluted) 15.92M 107.70M 2.21B
Enterprise value -$148.43M $7.27B $86.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDSWLTTMIASX
P/E 4.4x 35.7x 48.8x
P/FCF 9.9x 646.9x 8.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 28.5x 18.0x
P/S 0.8x 2.5x 4.3x
P/B 0.4x 4.7x 8.0x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 5.3x 9.6x
EV/EBITDA – 17.6x 22.2x
EV/EBIT – 24.3x 46.0x
EV/Revenue – 2.7x 4.5x
EV/FCF – 698.8x 8.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 30.8x 19.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.16 6.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDSWLTTMIASX
Revenue growth (1Y) – 37.6% 18.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 17.9% 3.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 51.3% 37.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 25.9% 6.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 120.0% 68.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 94.7% 4.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – 103.5% 83.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 230.0% 3.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – 100.0% 81.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 225.7% 7.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 6.6% 51.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 13.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -58.7% 57.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 27.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDSWLTTMIASX
Gross margin – 22.2% 19.5%
EBITDA margin – 15.3% 20.2%
Operating margin – 11.1% 9.8%
Pretax margin – 9.0% 10.7%
Net margin – 7.0% 8.5%
FCF margin – 0.4% 52.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 8.8% 23.6%
Return on equity – 13.5% 22.0%
Return on assets – 5.4% 8.4%
Return on invested capital – 10.1% 11.1%
Return on capital employed – 13.2% 8.4%
Asset turnover – 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDSWLTTMIASX
Debt / assets – 29.6% 25.2%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.3x 1.1x
Debt / FCF – 111.2x 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 15.8% 63.3% 63.7%
Equity / assets 84.2% 36.7% 36.3%
Interest coverage – 9.2x 9.9x
Current ratio 5.2x 1.7x 0.3x
Quick ratio 3.1x 1.4x 1.5x
Cash ratio 2.5x 0.5x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – 3.14 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDSWLTTMIASX
Dividend yield 10.2% – 0.9%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 10.2% – 0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDSWLTTMIASX
Forward P/E – 17.2xFY2026 34.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.29FY2026 $1.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +115.0%FY2026 +126.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +53.3% +37.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.26BFY2026 $24.36BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +46.4%FY2026 +19.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +60.2% +32.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDSWLTTMIASX
Held by institutions – 92.4% 6.9%
Institutions holding – 638 482
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.6% -2.5%
Institutions buying – 396 308
Institutions selling – 202 133
Buyers to sellers – 1.96 2.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DSWLTTMIASX
DSWL 1.00 0.13 0.16
TTMI 0.13 1.00 0.63
ASX 0.16 0.63 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DSWL, TTMI and ASX?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Deswell Industries (DSWL) $46.86M, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.57B, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) $97.68B.

Which stock is cheaper, DSWL, TTMI and ASX?

Deswell Industries (DSWL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Deswell Industries (DSWL) 4.4x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 35.7x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 48.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 17.2x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 34.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +37.6%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +18.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has the highest net margin (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 8.5%). On return on invested capital, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.1%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 11.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ASE Technology Holding (ASX) returned the most: Deswell Industries (DSWL) -16.4%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +53.3%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +228.8%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Deswell Industries (DSWL) -5.8%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +47.0%/yr, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +43.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Deswell Industries (DSWL) has the highest dividend yield: Deswell Industries (DSWL) 10.17%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 0.91%. Ttm Technologies (TTMI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Deswell Industries (DSWL) has been the steadiest (Deswell Industries (DSWL) 43.2%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.5%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 58.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DSWL, TTMI and ASX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.