DSWL vs FN vs PLXS Stock Comparison

Deswell Industries, Fabrinet and Plexus Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DSWL Deswell Industries Inc
$2.96 -3.0% 1M -14.7% 1Y
Market cap
$47.02M
P/E
4.4x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
10.14%
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
2 wins
FN Fabrinet
$348.37 -17.9% 1M -21.5% 1Y
Market cap
$12.48B
P/E
26.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.64B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins
PLXS Plexus Corp
$216.32 -18.7% 1M +55.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.77B
P/E
28.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.96B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Fabrinet leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Fabrinet 3, Plexus 3, Deswell Industries 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDSWLFNPLXSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $47.02M $12.48B $5.77B FN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.4x 26.4x 28.5x DSWL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.5x 20.4x PLXS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +35.7% +23.1% FN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 10.2% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 10.14% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.7% -21.5% +55.1% PLXS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.7%/yr +29.4%/yr +19.9%/yr FN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.1% 78.0% 42.8% PLXS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 96/100 57/100 43/100 DSWL

Percentile Scorecard

DSWLFNPLXS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDSWLFNPLXS
Valuation 97 #4 of 112 46 #61 of 112 50 #57 of 112
Growth – 61 #43 of 108 44 #61 of 108
Profitability – 70 #32 of 104 53 #49 of 104
Financial Health 90 #13 of 116 58 #49 of 116 24 #88 of 116
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 78 52 #38 of 78 –
Overall 96 57 43
  • DSWL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • PLXS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDSWLFNPLXSSPY
1 month -3.0%-17.9%-18.7% +0.7%
3 months -8.6%-20.7%-10.6% +3.7%
6 months -13.2%-49.0%-13.7% +7.1%
Year to date -14.5%-23.5%+47.2% +12.8%
1 year -14.7%-21.5%+55.1% +11.9%
3 years +33.3%+125.6%+122.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +10.1%+31.2%+30.6% +22.8%
5 years -25.4%+262.9%+147.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -5.7%+29.4%+19.9% +10.9%
10 years +68.2%+821.6%+377.2% +262.0%
10 years, per year +5.3%+24.9%+16.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDSWLFNPLXSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.1%78.0%42.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.2%83.2%46.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.243.161.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.34-0.281.29 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-57.8%-34.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.1%-53.3%-28.8% -1.2%
52-week high $4.06$746.47$303.82 $779.14
52-week low $2.91$314.98$132.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDSWLFNPLXS
P/E now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 32.9x 26.4xmedian 32.9x 28.5xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.9x 2.7xmedian 2.9x 1.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 20.0x 21.9xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 30.2x 2,957xmedian 30.2x 117.8xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.9x 5.1xmedian 2.9x 3.7xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.08 1.07median 1.08 1.97median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDSWLFNPLXS
Revenue – $4.64B $4.96B
Gross profit – $556.51M $502.67M
Operating income – $462.89M $263.84M
Net income – $473.03M $202.49M
Free cash flow – $4.22M –
EPS (diluted) – $13.05 $7.42
Cash & equivalents $23.06M $346.71M –
Shares (diluted) 15.92M 36.25M 27.29M
Enterprise value -$148.27M $8.73B $5.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDSWLFNPLXS
P/E 4.4x 26.4x 28.5x
P/FCF 10.0x 2,957x 117.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 48.6x 84.6x
P/S 0.8x 2.7x 1.2x
P/B 0.4x 5.1x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 5.1x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA – 21.9x –
EV/EBIT – 25.1x –
EV/Revenue – 2.5x 1.2x
EV/FCF – 2,750x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 45.2x 84.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.07 1.97

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDSWLFNPLXS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 35.7% 23.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 20.6% 5.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 34.6% 23.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 18.3% 8.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 42.7% 30.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 22.5% 10.4%
Net income growth (1Y) – 42.3% 17.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 24.0% 13.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 42.3% 18.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 24.7% 14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -21.8% -72.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% -25.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -98.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -69.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDSWLFNPLXS
Gross margin – 12.0% –
EBITDA margin – 11.4% –
Operating margin – 10.0% –
Pretax margin – 12.0% –
Net margin – 10.2% –
FCF margin – 0.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 5.5% 1.4%
Return on equity – 19.9% –
Return on assets – 12.8% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 20.1% –
Asset turnover – 1.3x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDSWLFNPLXS
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 15.8% 37.2% 60.0%
Equity / assets 84.2% 62.8% 40.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 5.2x 2.3x 1.4x
Quick ratio 3.1x 1.3x –
Cash ratio 2.5x 0.6x –
Altman Z-score – 8.18 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDSWLFNPLXS
Dividend yield 10.1% – –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 10.1% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDSWLFNPLXS
Forward P/E – 20.5xFY2027 20.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $16.97FY2027 $10.58FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +20.4%FY2027 +39.6%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – +21.3% +1.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $5.84BFY2027 $5.37BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – +25.9%FY2027 +8.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +27.9% +20.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDSWLFNPLXS
Held by institutions – 100.0% 99.7%
Institutions holding – 756 448
Change in shares held, QoQ – -6.6% -0.6%
Institutions buying – 432 246
Institutions selling – 245 135
Buyers to sellers – 1.76 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DSWLFNPLXS
DSWL 1.00 0.07 0.09
FN 0.07 1.00 0.65
PLXS 0.09 0.65 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DSWL, FN and PLXS?

Fabrinet (FN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Deswell Industries (DSWL) $47.02M, Fabrinet (FN) $12.48B, Plexus (PLXS) $5.77B.

Which stock is cheaper, DSWL, FN and PLXS?

Deswell Industries (DSWL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Deswell Industries (DSWL) 4.4x, Fabrinet (FN) 26.4x, Plexus (PLXS) 28.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Plexus (PLXS) is cheapest (Fabrinet (FN) 20.5x, Plexus (PLXS) 20.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fabrinet (FN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fabrinet (FN) +35.7%, Plexus (PLXS) +23.1%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Plexus (PLXS) returned the most: Deswell Industries (DSWL) -14.7%, Fabrinet (FN) -21.5%, Plexus (PLXS) +55.1%. Over five years, Fabrinet (FN) compounded fastest (Deswell Industries (DSWL) -5.7%/yr, Fabrinet (FN) +29.4%/yr, Plexus (PLXS) +19.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Deswell Industries (DSWL) 10.14%. Fabrinet (FN) and Plexus (PLXS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Plexus (PLXS) has been the steadiest (Deswell Industries (DSWL) 43.1%, Fabrinet (FN) 78.0%, Plexus (PLXS) 42.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DSWL, FN and PLXS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fabrinet (FN) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.