DRVN vs ECXJ vs KMFG Stock Comparison

Driven Brands Holdings, Cxj and KEEMO Fashion Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ECXJ CXJ GROUP CO., Ltd
$1.29 +89.7% 1M -31.7% 1Y
Market cap
$131.93M
P/E
2,034x
Revenue (TTM)
$663.21K
Div. yield
–
Consumer Goods Distributors Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
KMFG KEEMO Fashion Group Ltd
$0.25 0.0% 1M -70.6% 1Y
Market cap
$13.75M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Goods Distributors Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Driven Brands Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Driven Brands Holdings 5, Cxj 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDRVNECXJKMFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.00B $131.93M $13.75M DRVN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.1x 2,034x — DRVN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% +52.4% — ECXJ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.6% 9.8% — ECXJ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.9% -31.7% -70.6% DRVN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.0%/yr +16.2%/yr — ECXJ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.8% 372.6% 242.0% DRVN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 34/100 — DRVN

Percentile Scorecard

DRVNECXJKMFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDRVNECXJKMFG
Valuation 56 #15 of 33 4 #100 of 104 –
Growth 62 #12 of 30 67 #33 of 98 –
Profitability 56 #13 of 28 56 #43 of 97 –
Financial Health 22 #29 of 37 10 #99 of 110 1 #109 of 110
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 49 34 –
  • DRVN ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • ECXJ ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • KMFG ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDRVNECXJKMFGSPY
1 month +2.3%+89.7%0.0% +0.7%
3 months -15.9%-4.4%-73.4% +3.7%
6 months -11.1%+61.3%-77.3% +7.1%
Year to date -18.6%-32.1%-76.2% +12.8%
1 year -18.9%-31.7%-70.6% +11.9%
3 years +8.3%+87.0%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +2.7%+23.2%— +22.8%
5 years -62.8%+111.5%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -18.0%+16.2%— +10.9%
10 years —+7.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+0.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDRVNECXJKMFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.8%372.6%242.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.3%1,481.3%1,023.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.41-2.78-0.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.34-0.09-0.29 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.1%-99.3%-97.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.4%-32.1%-79.2% -1.2%
52-week high $17.09$1.90$1.20 $779.14
52-week low $10.30$0.07$0.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDRVNECXJKMFG
P/E now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 13.3x 2,034xmedian 17.0x —median 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.2x 198.9xmedian 0.5x —median 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 9.3x -538.4xmedian 9.2x —median 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 14.1x -4,167xmedian 15.6x —median 15.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.0x -82.2xmedian 1.7x -43.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.53median 0.27 75.81median 0.77 —median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDRVNECXJKMFG
Revenue $1.93B $663.21K –
Gross profit – $409.81K –
Operating income $269.79M $43.82K –
Net income $165.27M $64.85K –
Free cash flow $133.78M -$31.66K –
EPS (diluted) $1.00 $0.00 –
Cash & equivalents $183.95M $55.78K $15.67K
Total debt $1.69B – –
Shares (diluted) 164.94M 102.27M 55.00M
Enterprise value $1.47B $131.60M $13.68M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDRVNECXJKMFG
P/E 12.0x 2,034x –
P/FCF 14.9x -4,167x –
P/Operating cash flow 6.4x -4,167x –
P/S 1.0x 198.9x –
P/B 2.4x -82.2x -43.9x
P/Tangible book 8.8x -82.2x -43.9x
EV/EBITDA 8.8x -538.4x –
EV/EBIT 12.9x 3,009x –
EV/Revenue 1.8x 198.8x –
EV/FCF 26.1x -4,165x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.2x -4,165x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.53 75.81 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDRVNECXJKMFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% 52.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.6% -26.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 16.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -24.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 62.7% 101.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.1% 26.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 163.3% 102.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 26.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 163.0% 102.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 26.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.8% 93.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.8% -27.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 276.7% 93.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.1% -27.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDRVNECXJKMFG
Gross margin – 61.8% –
EBITDA margin 20.4% -36.9% –
Operating margin 14.0% 6.6% –
Pretax margin 8.3% 11.1% –
Net margin 8.6% 9.8% –
FCF margin 6.9% -4.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 16.2% -4.8% –
Return on equity 20.6% – –
Return on assets 4.8% 22.4% –
Return on invested capital 10.8% – –
Return on capital employed 8.6% – –
Asset turnover 0.6x 2.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x -0.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDRVNECXJKMFG
Debt / assets 47.6% – –
Debt / equity 2.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.8x – –
Debt / FCF 12.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 76.5% 582.9% 199.7%
Equity / assets 23.5% -482.9% -99.7%
Interest coverage 2.8x – –
Current ratio 1.5x 0.2x 0.0x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.1x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 0.96 5.32 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDRVNECXJKMFG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDRVNECXJKMFG
Forward P/E 10.5xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.15FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY -5.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +30.4% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.93BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +3.6%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +18.9% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDRVNECXJKMFG
Held by institutions 43.3% – –
Institutions holding 193 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.5% – –
Institutions buying 111 – –
Institutions selling 51 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.18 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DRVNECXJKMFG
DRVN 1.00 0.02 -0.02
ECXJ 0.02 1.00 0.04
KMFG -0.02 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DRVN, ECXJ and KMFG?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) $2.00B, Cxj (ECXJ) $131.93M, KEEMO Fashion (KMFG) $13.75M.

Which stock is cheaper, DRVN, ECXJ and KMFG?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 12.1x, Cxj (ECXJ) 2,034x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cxj (ECXJ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) +7.6%, Cxj (ECXJ) +52.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cxj (ECXJ) has the highest net margin (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 8.6%, Cxj (ECXJ) 9.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) returned the most: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -18.9%, Cxj (ECXJ) -31.7%, KEEMO Fashion (KMFG) -70.6%. Over five years, Cxj (ECXJ) compounded fastest (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -18.0%/yr, Cxj (ECXJ) +16.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) has been the steadiest (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 55.8%, Cxj (ECXJ) 372.6%, KEEMO Fashion (KMFG) 242.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DRVN, ECXJ and KMFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.