DRIO vs DOCS vs EVCM Stock Comparison

DarioHealth, Doximity and EverCommerce Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DRIO DarioHealth Corp.
$3.48 -47.5% 1M -77.9% 1Y
Market cap
$32.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$21.00M
Div. yield
–
Healthcare IT Technology
1 win
DOCS Doximity, Inc.
$33.23 +26.1% 1M -51.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.98B
P/E
36.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$655.57M
Div. yield
–
Healthcare IT Technology
7 wins
EVCM EverCommerce Inc.
$9.40 +16.3% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.66B
P/E
48.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$598.10M
Div. yield
–
Healthcare IT Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Doximity leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Doximity 7, EverCommerce 3, DarioHealth 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDRIODOCSEVCMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.52M $5.98B $1.66B DOCS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.9x 36.3x 48.8x DOCS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 23.2x 12.4x EVCM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -22.6% +11.2% +4.2% DOCS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -169.9% 25.5% 5.7% DOCS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -35.5% — 4.3% EVCM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.6x — 3.1x DRIO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -77.9% -51.5% -21.9% EVCM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -59.6%/yr -13.7%/yr -14.5%/yr DOCS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 83.4% 64.6% 67.2% DOCS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 29/100 73/100 63/100 DOCS

Percentile Scorecard

DRIODOCSEVCM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDRIODOCSEVCM
Valuation 22 #70 of 89 53 #42 of 89 74 #24 of 89
Growth 39 #50 of 81 40 #49 of 81 55 #37 of 81
Profitability 9 #69 of 76 95 #5 of 76 69 #24 of 76
Financial Health 45 #52 of 94 97 #4 of 94 42 #55 of 94
Shareholder Returns – 82 #10 of 51 76 #13 of 51
Overall 29 73 63
  • DRIO ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • DOCS ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • EVCM ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDRIODOCSEVCMSPY
1 month -47.5%+26.1%+16.3% -0.2%
3 months -54.2%+55.1%-21.7% +3.9%
6 months -53.0%+35.2%-21.6% +8.2%
Year to date -69.4%-25.0%-22.4% +12.9%
1 year -77.9%-51.5%-21.9% +12.3%
3 years -86.6%+59.9%-2.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year -48.9%+17.0%-0.8% +23.3%
5 years -98.9%-52.0%-54.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year -59.6%-13.7%-14.5% +10.9%
10 years -99.7%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year -44.7%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDRIODOCSEVCMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 83.4%64.6%67.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.3%67.1%74.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.170.430.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.93-0.80-0.33 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.1%-78.3%-72.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.9%-51.5%-29.9% -1.2%
52-week high $15.75$68.50$13.40 $779.14
52-week low $3.40$18.01$6.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDRIODOCSEVCM
P/E now vs peer median -0.9xmedian 40.1x 36.3xmedian 40.1x 48.8xmedian 40.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.5x 9.1xmedian 2.5x 2.8xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 18.5x 23.6xmedian 18.5x 16.4xmedian 18.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 20.1x 19.5xmedian 20.1x 15.9xmedian 20.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.8x 6.5xmedian 1.8x 2.3xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -0.02median 1.73 2.27median 1.73 1.27median 1.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDRIODOCSEVCM
Revenue $21.00M $655.57M $598.10M
Gross profit $12.21M $577.34M $465.42M
Operating income -$31.83M $194.05M $59.29M
Net income -$35.67M $167.05M $34.05M
Free cash flow -$25.48M $306.28M $104.22M
R&D $10.45M $142.38M $82.15M
EPS (diluted) $-3.82 $0.87 $0.19
Cash & equivalents $6.63M $273.60M $133.50M
Total debt $123.36M – $520.94M
Shares (diluted) 9.34M 191.17M 178.79M
Enterprise value -$59.60M $2.93B $1.16B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDRIODOCSEVCM
P/E -0.9x 36.3x 48.8x
P/FCF -1.3x 19.5x 15.9x
P/Operating cash flow -1.3x 19.5x 15.5x
P/S 1.5x 9.1x 2.8x
P/B 0.6x 6.5x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 6.8x 4.6x
EV/EBITDA -1.7x 23.6x 16.4x
EV/EBIT -1.6x 27.3x 34.5x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 8.1x 3.4x
EV/FCF -1.9x 17.3x 19.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -2.0x 17.3x 19.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.02 2.27 1.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDRIODOCSEVCM
Revenue growth (1Y) -22.6% 11.2% 4.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -7.6% 14.5% -2.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -18.2% 8.6% 3.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 14.6% 3.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% -17.9% 12.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 13.4% 82.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.3% -29.0% 262.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.8% 12.0% 37.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 83.9% -25.2% 267.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 54.6% 16.0% 38.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.4% 4.2% -20.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 16.8% 9.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 5.3% 4.1% -21.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 17.0% 9.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDRIODOCSEVCM
Gross margin 58.2% 88.1% 77.8%
EBITDA margin -141.5% 34.1% 20.9%
Operating margin -151.6% 29.6% 9.9%
Pretax margin -167.6% 34.5% 5.3%
Net margin -169.9% 25.5% 5.7%
FCF margin -121.3% 46.7% 17.4%
Operating cash flow margin -120.7% 46.7% 17.9%
Return on equity -60.7% 17.9% 4.8%
Return on assets -35.7% 15.1% 2.5%
Return on invested capital -35.5% – 4.3%
Return on capital employed -35.2% 20.4% 4.7%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.6x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.8x 3.1x
Stock comp / revenue 33.6% 20.8% 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDRIODOCSEVCM
Debt / assets 32.2% – 38.2%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.6x – 3.1x
Debt / FCF -1.2x – 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 43.0% 15.5% 47.6%
Equity / assets 57.0% 84.5% 52.4%
Interest coverage -7.0x – –
Current ratio 2.3x 6.1x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.6x 5.8x 1.8x
Cash ratio 1.5x 4.6x 1.3x
Altman Z-score -7.03 23.26 1.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDRIODOCSEVCM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 6.5% 4.5%
Shareholder yield – 6.5% 4.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDRIODOCSEVCM
Forward P/E – 23.2xFY2026 12.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.84FY2026 $1.43FY2026 $0.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -5.9%FY2026 0.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +5.6% -5.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.11MFY2026 $653.93MFY2026 $640.55MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +1.4%FY2026 +8.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +25.1% +14.9% -4.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDRIODOCSEVCM
Held by institutions – 100.0% 92.1%
Institutions holding – 358 84
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.7% +0.2%
Institutions buying – 171 33
Institutions selling – 138 27
Buyers to sellers – 1.24 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DRIODOCSEVCM
DRIO 1.00 -0.08 -0.05
DOCS -0.08 1.00 0.31
EVCM -0.05 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DRIO, DOCS and EVCM?

Doximity (DOCS) is the largest by market capitalisation: DarioHealth (DRIO) $32.52M, Doximity (DOCS) $5.98B, EverCommerce (EVCM) $1.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, DRIO, DOCS and EVCM?

Doximity (DOCS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (DarioHealth (DRIO) -0.9x, Doximity (DOCS) 36.3x, EverCommerce (EVCM) 48.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, EverCommerce (EVCM) is cheapest (Doximity (DOCS) 23.2x, EverCommerce (EVCM) 12.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Doximity (DOCS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: DarioHealth (DRIO) -22.6%, Doximity (DOCS) +11.2%, EverCommerce (EVCM) +4.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Doximity (DOCS) has the highest net margin (DarioHealth (DRIO) -169.9%, Doximity (DOCS) 25.5%, EverCommerce (EVCM) 5.7%). On return on invested capital, EverCommerce (EVCM) leads (DarioHealth (DRIO) -35.5%, EverCommerce (EVCM) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year EverCommerce (EVCM) returned the most: DarioHealth (DRIO) -77.9%, Doximity (DOCS) -51.5%, EverCommerce (EVCM) -21.9%. Over five years, Doximity (DOCS) compounded fastest (DarioHealth (DRIO) -59.6%/yr, Doximity (DOCS) -13.7%/yr, EverCommerce (EVCM) -14.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Doximity (DOCS) has been the steadiest (DarioHealth (DRIO) 83.4%, Doximity (DOCS) 64.6%, EverCommerce (EVCM) 67.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DRIO, DOCS and EVCM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Doximity (DOCS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.