DQWS vs KMB vs EPC Stock Comparison

DSwiss, Kimberly Clark and Edgewell Personal Care Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DQWS DSwiss Inc
$0.08 0.0% 1M +166.7% 1Y
Market cap
$16.55M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.48M
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
$109.10 +10.8% 1M -9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$36.29B
P/E
18.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.58B
Div. yield
4.67%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
9 wins
EPC EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE Co
$28.05 +0.8% 1M +43.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.29B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.24B
Div. yield
2.14%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Kimberly Clark leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Kimberly Clark 9, Edgewell Personal Care 1, DSwiss 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDQWSKMBEPCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.55M $36.29B $1.29B KMB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -67.3x 18.5x -13.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.3x 15.1x KMB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -63.7% +0.7% +11.6% EPC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -16.6% 11.8% -4.2% KMB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 19.4% 0.4% KMB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.7x 8.8x KMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 4.67% 2.14% KMB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +166.7% -9.6% +43.6% DQWS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -35.2%/yr -3.5%/yr -4.7%/yr KMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 224.4% 29.4% 42.9% KMB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 17/100 54/100 41/100 KMB

Percentile Scorecard

DQWSKMBEPC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDQWSKMBEPC
Valuation 24 #40 of 52 57 #23 of 52 71 #16 of 52
Growth 4 #48 of 50 43 #29 of 50 22 #39 of 50
Profitability 23 #35 of 45 82 #9 of 45 46 #25 of 45
Financial Health – 38 #35 of 56 35 #37 of 56
Shareholder Returns – 50 #16 of 31 33 #21 of 31
Overall 17 54 41
  • DQWS ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • KMB ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • EPC ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDQWSKMBEPCSPY
1 month 0.0%+10.8%+0.8% -0.2%
3 months +166.7%-3.5%-0.7% +3.9%
6 months -11.1%+10.8%+23.1% +8.2%
Year to date +100.0%+8.1%+64.5% +12.9%
1 year +166.7%-9.6%+43.6% +12.3%
3 years -20.0%-6.6%-18.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -7.2%-2.3%-6.5% +23.3%
5 years -88.6%-16.1%-21.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -35.2%-3.5%-4.7% +10.9%
10 years —-4.1%-63.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-0.4%-9.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDQWSKMBEPCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 224.4%29.4%42.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —32.8%41.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.430.020.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.74-0.331.01 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.9%-37.3%-69.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.1%-9.6%-5.4% -1.2%
52-week high $0.09$120.66$29.66 $779.14
52-week low $0.03$93.05$15.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDQWSKMBEPC
P/E now vs peer median -67.3xmedian 18.5x 18.5xmedian 18.5x -13.9xmedian 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 1.6x 2.2xmedian 1.6x 0.6xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 227.5xmedian 12.9x 12.9xmedian 12.9x 21.7xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.6x 19.9xmedian 18.6x 24.7xmedian 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.2x 19.4xmedian 2.2x 0.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.91median 0.97 2.82median 0.97 0.33median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDQWSKMBEPC
Revenue $1.48M $16.58B $2.24B
Gross profit – $6.10B $885.90M
Operating income – $2.51B $17.90M
Net income -$245.94K $1.99B -$93.20M
Free cash flow – $1.82B $52.40M
R&D – – $59.40M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $5.87 $-2.00
Cash & equivalents – $956.00M $397.10M
Total debt – $6.52B $1.28B
Shares (diluted) 206.90M 333.30M 46.60M
Enterprise value $16.55M $33.61B $146.78M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDQWSKMBEPC
P/E -67.3x 18.5x -13.9x
P/FCF – 19.9x 24.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 10.9x 10.7x
P/S 11.2x 2.2x 0.6x
P/B – 19.4x 0.9x
P/Tangible book – 20.1x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 227.5x 12.9x 21.7x
EV/EBIT -21,808x 16.6x 121.5x
EV/Revenue 11.2x 2.5x 1.0x
EV/FCF – 23.0x 41.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.6x 17.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.91 2.82 0.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDQWSKMBEPC
Revenue growth (1Y) -63.7% 0.7% 11.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.0% -6.7% -0.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.0% 1.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -2.8% -1.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -5.8% -85.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% -57.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -4,197% -18.9% -243.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -73.8% 6.5% -40.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -4,197% -19.5% -245.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -73.6% 6.6% -42.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 16.1% 135.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 1.5% -15.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -13.4% 112.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -8.7% -29.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDQWSKMBEPC
Gross margin – 36.8% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 4.9% 19.5% 4.5%
Operating margin – 15.2% 0.8%
Pretax margin -15.4% 13.5% -1.5%
Net margin -16.6% 11.8% -4.2%
FCF margin – 11.0% 2.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 20.1% 5.4%
Return on equity – 105.0% -4.8%
Return on assets – 11.1% -2.0%
Return on invested capital – 19.4% 0.4%
Return on capital employed – 23.1% 0.6%
Asset turnover – 0.9x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.7x -1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDQWSKMBEPC
Debt / assets – 35.1% 36.2%
Debt / equity – 3.5x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.7x 8.8x
Debt / FCF – 3.6x 24.4x
Liabilities / assets – 89.9% 58.7%
Equity / assets – 10.1% 41.3%
Interest coverage – 10.7x 0.3x
Current ratio – 0.9x 1.8x
Quick ratio – 0.4x 0.9x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 3.34 1.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDQWSKMBEPC
Dividend yield – 4.7% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 1.2%
Shareholder yield – 4.7% 3.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 84.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 92.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDQWSKMBEPC
Forward P/E – 14.3xFY2026 15.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $7.64FY2026 $1.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +1.5%FY2026 -26.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -8.0% +13.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $16.99BFY2026 $2.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 -6.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +5.2% -9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDQWSKMBEPC
Held by institutions – 96.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 1,710 223
Change in shares held, QoQ – +9.1% +3.0%
Institutions buying – 827 107
Institutions selling – 620 79
Buyers to sellers – 1.33 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DQWSKMBEPC
DQWS 1.00 -0.06 -0.02
KMB -0.06 1.00 0.42
EPC -0.02 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DQWS, KMB and EPC?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) is the largest by market capitalisation: DSwiss (DQWS) $16.55M, Kimberly Clark (KMB) $36.29B, Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) $1.29B.

Which company is growing faster?

Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: DSwiss (DQWS) -63.7%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) +0.7%, Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) +11.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest net margin (DSwiss (DQWS) -16.6%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 11.8%, Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) -4.2%). On return on invested capital, Kimberly Clark (KMB) leads (Kimberly Clark (KMB) 19.4%, Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) 0.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year DSwiss (DQWS) returned the most: DSwiss (DQWS) +166.7%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -9.6%, Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) +43.6%. Over five years, Kimberly Clark (KMB) compounded fastest (DSwiss (DQWS) -35.2%/yr, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -3.5%/yr, Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) -4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest dividend yield: Kimberly Clark (KMB) 4.67%, Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) 2.14%. DSwiss (DQWS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kimberly Clark (KMB) has been the steadiest (DSwiss (DQWS) 224.4%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 29.4%, Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) 42.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DQWS, KMB and EPC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kimberly Clark (KMB) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.