DQWS vs BBWI vs KMB Stock Comparison

DSwiss, Bath & Body Works and Kimberly Clark Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DQWS DSwiss Inc
$0.08 0.0% 1M +166.7% 1Y
Market cap
$16.55M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.48M
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc.
$21.94 +33.4% 1M -15.7% 1Y
Market cap
$4.43B
P/E
7.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.38B
Div. yield
3.65%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
4 wins
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
$109.10 +10.8% 1M -9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$36.29B
P/E
18.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.58B
Div. yield
4.67%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kimberly Clark leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Kimberly Clark 7, Bath & Body Works 4, DSwiss 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDQWSBBWIKMBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.55M $4.43B $36.29B KMB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -67.3x 7.2x 18.5x BBWI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.8x 14.3x BBWI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -63.7% +0.1% +0.7% KMB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -16.6% 9.0% 11.8% KMB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 32.2% 19.4% BBWI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.0x 1.7x KMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.65% 4.67% KMB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +166.7% -15.7% -9.6% DQWS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -35.2%/yr -20.6%/yr -3.5%/yr KMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 224.4% 61.8% 29.4% KMB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 17/100 66/100 54/100 BBWI

Percentile Scorecard

DQWSBBWIKMB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDQWSBBWIKMB
Valuation 24 #40 of 52 90 #6 of 52 57 #23 of 52
Growth 4 #48 of 50 47 #27 of 50 43 #29 of 50
Profitability 23 #35 of 45 93 #4 of 45 82 #9 of 45
Financial Health – 31 #39 of 56 38 #35 of 56
Shareholder Returns – 67 #11 of 31 50 #16 of 31
Overall 17 66 54
  • DQWS ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • BBWI ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • KMB ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDQWSBBWIKMBSPY
1 month 0.0%+33.4%+10.8% -0.2%
3 months +166.7%+7.0%-3.5% +3.9%
6 months -11.1%+13.9%+10.8% +8.2%
Year to date +100.0%+9.3%+8.1% +12.9%
1 year +166.7%-15.7%-9.6% +12.3%
3 years -20.0%-22.4%-6.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year -7.2%-8.1%-2.3% +23.3%
5 years -88.6%-68.3%-16.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -35.2%-20.6%-3.5% +10.9%
10 years —-62.7%-4.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-9.4%-0.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDQWSBBWIKMBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 224.4%61.8%29.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —64.0%32.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.431.420.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.74-0.25-0.33 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.9%-81.1%-37.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.1%-15.9%-9.6% -1.2%
52-week high $0.09$26.09$120.66 $779.14
52-week low $0.03$14.85$93.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDQWSBBWIKMB
P/E now vs peer median -67.3xmedian 18.5x 7.2xmedian 18.5x 18.5xmedian 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 1.6x 0.6xmedian 1.6x 2.2xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 227.5xmedian 12.9x 5.2xmedian 12.9x 12.9xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.6x 4.7xmedian 18.6x 19.9xmedian 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.2x -4.2xmedian 2.2x 19.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.91median 0.97 3.40median 0.97 2.82median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDQWSBBWIKMB
Revenue $1.48M $7.38B $16.58B
Gross profit – $3.23B $6.10B
Operating income – $1.13B $2.51B
Net income -$245.94K $662.00M $1.99B
Free cash flow – – $1.82B
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $3.28 $5.87
Cash & equivalents – $794.00M $956.00M
Total debt – $3.61B $6.52B
Shares (diluted) 206.90M 202.00M 333.30M
Enterprise value $16.55M $2.09B $33.61B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDQWSBBWIKMB
P/E -67.3x 7.2x 18.5x
P/FCF – 4.7x 19.9x
P/Operating cash flow – – 10.9x
P/S 11.2x 0.6x 2.2x
P/B – -4.2x 19.4x
P/Tangible book – -3.6x 20.1x
EV/EBITDA 227.5x 5.2x 12.9x
EV/EBIT -21,808x 6.4x 16.6x
EV/Revenue 11.2x 1.0x 2.5x
EV/FCF – – 23.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 12.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.91 3.40 2.82

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDQWSBBWIKMB
Revenue growth (1Y) -63.7% 0.1% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.0% -0.3% -6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -1.6% 2.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.9% -2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -10.2% -5.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -2.5% 3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -4,197% -9.1% -18.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -73.8% -2.1% 6.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -4,197% -5.0% -19.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -73.6% 2.1% 6.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 16.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 1.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -13.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -8.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDQWSBBWIKMB
Gross margin – 43.8% 36.8%
EBITDA margin 4.9% 18.7% 19.5%
Operating margin – 15.4% 15.2%
Pretax margin -15.4% 12.2% 13.5%
Net margin -16.6% 9.0% 11.8%
FCF margin – – 11.0%
Operating cash flow margin – – 20.1%
Return on equity – – 105.0%
Return on assets – 12.9% 11.1%
Return on invested capital – 32.2% 19.4%
Return on capital employed – 33.3% 23.1%
Asset turnover – 1.4x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDQWSBBWIKMB
Debt / assets – 70.1% 35.1%
Debt / equity – -3.4x 3.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.0x 1.7x
Debt / FCF – – 3.6x
Liabilities / assets – 120.5% 89.9%
Equity / assets – -20.5% 10.1%
Interest coverage – 4.2x 10.7x
Current ratio – 1.2x 0.9x
Quick ratio – 0.6x 0.4x
Cash ratio – 0.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 2.33 3.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDQWSBBWIKMB
Dividend yield – 3.6% 4.7%
Net buyback yield – – 0.0%
Shareholder yield – 3.6% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 84.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 92.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDQWSBBWIKMB
Forward P/E – 7.8xFY2026 14.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.80FY2026 $7.64FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -12.8%FY2026 +1.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -5.7% -8.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.36BFY2026 $16.99BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.0%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +0.2% +5.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDQWSBBWIKMB
Held by institutions – 100.0% 96.8%
Institutions holding – 463 1,710
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.6% +9.1%
Institutions buying – 244 827
Institutions selling – 171 620
Buyers to sellers – 1.43 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DQWSBBWIKMB
DQWS 1.00 -0.01 -0.06
BBWI -0.01 1.00 0.16
KMB -0.06 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DQWS, BBWI and KMB?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) is the largest by market capitalisation: DSwiss (DQWS) $16.55M, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) $4.43B, Kimberly Clark (KMB) $36.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, DQWS, BBWI and KMB?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (DSwiss (DQWS) -67.3x, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 7.2x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 18.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) is cheapest (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 7.8x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 14.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: DSwiss (DQWS) -63.7%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) +0.1%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest net margin (DSwiss (DQWS) -16.6%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 9.0%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) leads (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 32.2%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 19.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year DSwiss (DQWS) returned the most: DSwiss (DQWS) +166.7%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -15.7%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -9.6%. Over five years, Kimberly Clark (KMB) compounded fastest (DSwiss (DQWS) -35.2%/yr, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -20.6%/yr, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest dividend yield: Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 3.65%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 4.67%. DSwiss (DQWS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kimberly Clark (KMB) has been the steadiest (DSwiss (DQWS) 224.4%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 61.8%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 29.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DQWS, BBWI and KMB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kimberly Clark (KMB) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.