DOUG vs BEKE vs RMSG Stock Comparison

Douglas Elliman, KE Holdings and Real Messenger Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DOUG Douglas Elliman Inc.
$1.61 +3.2% 1M -40.8% 1Y
Market cap
$146.33M
P/E
5.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01B
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
3 wins
BEKE KE Holdings Inc.
$17.62 +8.2% 1M -1.3% 1Y
Market cap
$39.62B
P/E
21.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.77B
Div. yield
1.59%
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
5 wins
RMSG Real Messenger Corp
$0.22 -24.1% 1M -90.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.96M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

KE Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (KE Holdings 5, Douglas Elliman 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOUGBEKERMSGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $146.33M $39.62B $1.96M BEKE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 5.5x 21.2x -0.5x DOUG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.8x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.7% -10.9% — DOUG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.5% 7.2% — BEKE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 1.59% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -40.8% -1.3% -90.5% BEKE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -2.8%/yr -53.3%/yr BEKE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.9% 37.0% 257.9% BEKE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 38/100 — DOUG

Percentile Scorecard

DOUGBEKERMSG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOUGBEKERMSG
Valuation 61 #31 of 78 51 #39 of 78 0 #78 of 78
Growth 71 #21 of 69 43 #40 of 69 –
Profitability 51 #31 of 62 49 #32 of 62 –
Financial Health 73 #21 of 76 – 72 #22 of 76
Shareholder Returns – 8 #45 of 49 –
Overall 64 38 –
  • DOUG ranked among 84 companies in Real Estate
  • BEKE ranked among 84 companies in Real Estate
  • RMSG ranked among 84 companies in Real Estate

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOUGBEKERMSGSPY
1 month +3.2%+8.2%-24.1% -0.8%
3 months -7.5%+7.5%-40.5% +3.5%
6 months -14.8%+9.9%-84.5% +7.0%
Year to date -32.1%+11.8%-83.7% +12.2%
1 year -40.8%-1.3%-90.5% +13.0%
3 years -9.0%+13.6%-98.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.1%+4.3%-73.2% +23.1%
5 years —-13.4%-97.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-2.8%-53.3% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureDOUGBEKERMSGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.9%37.0%257.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.2%36.7%188.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.290.791.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.03-0.35 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.0%-62.9%-99.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -43.5%-10.1%-92.6% -1.8%
52-week high $2.85$19.59$2.99 $779.14
52-week low $1.40$14.26$0.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOUGBEKERMSG
P/E now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 20.1x 21.2xmedian 20.1x -0.5xmedian 20.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.4x 3.1xmedian 2.4x 66.5xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 12.9x —median 12.9x —median 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -7.8xmedian 18.9x 34.6xmedian 18.9x -0.5xmedian 18.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.8x —median 0.8x 4.0xmedian 0.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.15median 0.77 7.72median 0.77 —median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOUGBEKERMSG
Revenue $1.01B $12.77B –
Gross profit $175.64M $3.07B –
Operating income $35.43M $694.87M –
Net income $25.12M $685.32M –
Free cash flow -$18.69M $1.15B –
R&D – $345.62M –
EPS (diluted) $0.29 $0.80 –
Cash & equivalents $105.23M $1.09B $321.97K
Shares (diluted) 85.71M 1.16B 8.91M
Enterprise value -$313.38M $12.44B -$7.58M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOUGBEKERMSG
P/E 5.5x 21.2x -0.5x
P/FCF -7.8x 34.6x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow -8.8x 34.6x –
P/S 0.1x 3.1x 66.5x
P/B 0.9x – 4.0x
P/Tangible book 1.5x – 4.0x
EV/EBITDA 0.9x – –
EV/EBIT 1.2x 47.1x –
EV/Revenue 0.0x 2.6x –
EV/FCF -2.2x 28.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow -2.5x 28.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.15 7.72 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOUGBEKERMSG
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.7% -10.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.2% 6.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -15.2% -3.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 1.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 202.5% 47.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 37.5% -5.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 140.2% 25.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% -2.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 139.6% 2.4% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 36.2% 2.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -235.3% 222.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.8% -13.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -91.1% 89.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 24.5% -13.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOUGBEKERMSG
Gross margin 17.5% 24.0% –
EBITDA margin 4.3% – –
Operating margin 3.5% 5.4% –
Pretax margin 2.8% 7.9% –
Net margin 2.5% 7.2% –
FCF margin -1.9% 9.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -1.7% 9.0% –
Return on equity 14.5% – –
Return on assets 5.5% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 10.6% – –
Asset turnover 2.3x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.7x 1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOUGBEKERMSG
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 62.4% – 51.1%
Equity / assets 37.6% – 48.9%
Interest coverage 17.7x – –
Current ratio 1.5x – 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.3x – 0.7x
Cash ratio 1.0x – 0.7x
Altman Z-score 2.59 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOUGBEKERMSG
Dividend yield – 1.6% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOUGBEKERMSG
Forward P/E – 14.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.24FY2026 $1.19FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +7.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +10.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.09BFY2026 $13.59BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +6.2%FY2026 +0.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +7.7% -4.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOUGBEKERMSG
Held by institutions 51.2% 5.7% –
Institutions holding 132 205 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.5% -8.0% –
Institutions buying 67 106 –
Institutions selling 41 64 –
Buyers to sellers 1.63 1.66 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOUGBEKERMSG
DOUG 1.00 0.08 0.06
BEKE 0.08 1.00 0.02
RMSG 0.06 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOUG, BEKE and RMSG?

KE Holdings (BEKE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Douglas Elliman (DOUG) $146.33M, KE Holdings (BEKE) $39.62B, Real Messenger (RMSG) $1.96M.

Which stock is cheaper, DOUG, BEKE and RMSG?

Douglas Elliman (DOUG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Douglas Elliman (DOUG) 5.5x, KE Holdings (BEKE) 21.2x, Real Messenger (RMSG) -0.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Douglas Elliman (DOUG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Douglas Elliman (DOUG) -2.7%, KE Holdings (BEKE) -10.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

KE Holdings (BEKE) has the highest net margin (Douglas Elliman (DOUG) 2.5%, KE Holdings (BEKE) 7.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year KE Holdings (BEKE) returned the most: Douglas Elliman (DOUG) -40.8%, KE Holdings (BEKE) -1.3%, Real Messenger (RMSG) -90.5%. Over five years, KE Holdings (BEKE) compounded fastest (KE Holdings (BEKE) -2.8%/yr, Real Messenger (RMSG) -53.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Douglas Elliman (DOUG) 0.00%, KE Holdings (BEKE) 1.59%. Douglas Elliman (DOUG) and Real Messenger (RMSG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, KE Holdings (BEKE) has been the steadiest (Douglas Elliman (DOUG) 61.9%, KE Holdings (BEKE) 37.0%, Real Messenger (RMSG) 257.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOUG, BEKE and RMSG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, KE Holdings (BEKE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.