DOO vs WGO vs MCFT Stock Comparison

Brp, Winnebago Industries and MasterCraft Boat Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DOO BRP Inc.
$58.44 +2.2% 1M -13.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.38B
P/E
53.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
WGO Winnebago Industries Inc
$28.10 +3.5% 1M -30.0% 1Y
Market cap
$802.85M
P/E
23.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.70B
Div. yield
0.05%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Winnebago Industries leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Winnebago Industries 4, MasterCraft Boat Holdings 4, Brp 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOOWGOMCFTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.38B $802.85M $342.23M DOO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 53.9x 23.3x -205.9x WGO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.8x 13.2x 10.0x MCFT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% -3.4% +22.8% MCFT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% 1.3% -0.5% WGO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% 3.1% — DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 2.0x — WGO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.1% -30.0% -14.3% DOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.7%/yr -15.5%/yr -5.5%/yr MCFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 45.8% 40.0% MCFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 74/100 51/100 WGO

Percentile Scorecard

DOOWGOMCFT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOOWGOMCFT
Valuation 82 #10 of 50 94 #4 of 50 49 #26 of 50
Growth 57 #21 of 48 32 #33 of 48 17 #40 of 48
Profitability 96 #3 of 46 69 #15 of 46 60 #19 of 46
Financial Health 29 #37 of 52 90 #6 of 52 82 #10 of 52
Shareholder Returns 24 #23 of 30 83 #6 of 30 48 #16 of 30
Overall 58 74 51
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • WGO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • MCFT ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOOWGOMCFTSPY
1 month +2.2%+3.5%-5.2% -0.8%
3 months -5.3%-9.7%-21.5% +3.5%
6 months +6.3%-12.7%-16.4% +7.0%
Year to date -17.4%-30.7%+3.2% +12.2%
1 year -13.1%-30.0%-14.3% +13.0%
3 years -13.4%-50.9%-3.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -4.7%-21.1%-1.2% +23.1%
5 years -32.8%-57.0%-24.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year -7.7%-15.5%-5.5% +11.0%
10 years +192.2%-1.2%+71.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.3%-0.1%+5.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureDOOWGOMCFTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%45.8%40.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.2%43.2%39.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.940.770.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-0.66-0.36 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.2%-70.7%-57.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.4%-43.6%-28.7% -1.8%
52-week high $81.64$49.85$27.38 $779.14
52-week low $50.93$22.68$17.21 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOOWGOMCFT
P/E now vs peer median 52.6xmedian 18.9x 23.0xmedian 18.9x -201.6xmedian 18.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.5x 0.3xmedian 0.5x 1.0xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 8.2x 8.2xmedian 8.2x 23.2xmedian 8.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 9.4x 5.5xmedian 9.4x 15.0xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 0.9x 0.6xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -1.04median 1.40 -0.55median 1.40 7.60median 1.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOOWGOMCFT
Revenue $6.74B $2.70B $348.90M
Gross profit $1.39B $350.20M $79.78M
Operating income $283.70M $66.20M -$1.11M
Net income $81.25M $34.50M -$1.66M
Free cash flow $856.16M $144.60M $22.38M
R&D $332.77M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.10 $1.21 $-0.10
Cash & equivalents $462.34M $181.40M $43.87M
Total debt $7.25B $443.30M –
Shares (diluted) 73.90M 28.40M 17.16M
Enterprise value $2.75B $335.25M $65.03M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOOWGOMCFT
P/E 52.6x 23.0x -201.6x
P/FCF 5.0x 5.5x 15.0x
P/Operating cash flow 4.0x 4.7x 11.0x
P/S 0.6x 0.3x 1.0x
P/B 17.9x 0.6x 0.9x
P/Tangible book -36.8x 1.0x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 9.1x 8.2x 23.2x
EV/EBIT 19.6x 16.0x -261.4x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.4x 0.8x
EV/FCF 6.5x 7.3x 13.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.2x 6.3x 9.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.04 -0.55 7.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOOWGOMCFT
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% -3.4% 22.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.3% -8.2% -19.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.3% -4.1% 40.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.4% -15.8% -22.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.6% 15.7% -109.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.5% -39.6% -26.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -15.6% 34.2% -123.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -52.2% -45.7% -26.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -11.7% 33.8% -122.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.7% -41.6% -26.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.6% 30.9% -20.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% -16.9% -39.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 259.1% 61.6% -22.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% -11.9% -41.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOOWGOMCFT
Gross margin 20.6% 13.0% 22.9%
EBITDA margin 9.1% 4.8% 3.6%
Operating margin 4.2% 2.4% -0.3%
Pretax margin 1.8% 1.6% 0.4%
Net margin 1.2% 1.3% -0.5%
FCF margin 12.7% 5.3% 6.4%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% 6.2% 8.7%
Return on equity 21.6% 2.8% -0.6%
Return on assets 1.7% 1.7% -0.4%
Return on invested capital 6.0% 3.1% –
Return on capital employed 10.1% 3.9% -0.4%
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.3x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.3x 4.9x -18.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.6% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOOWGOMCFT
Debt / assets 37.7% 21.1% –
Debt / equity 7.5x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 2.0x –
Debt / FCF 2.1x 3.1x –
Liabilities / assets 94.9% 41.2% 23.8%
Equity / assets 5.1% 58.8% 76.2%
Interest coverage 1.9x 3.2x -5.2x
Current ratio 1.2x 2.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.9x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.5x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 3.32 2.87

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOOWGOMCFT
Dividend yield 1.6% 5.0% –
Net buyback yield -0.8% 0.2% 0.7%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 5.2% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 115.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOOWGOMCFT
Forward P/E 20.8xFY2026 13.2xFY2027 10.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $2.81FY2026 $2.13FY2027 $1.96FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -26.4%FY2026 +19.0%FY2027 +11.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +31.7% +14.6% +16.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.01BFY2026 $2.80BFY2027 $662.23MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +3.7%FY2027 +89.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% +5.1% -6.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOOWGOMCFT
Held by institutions 0.0% 100.0% 72.9%
Institutions holding 1 245 152
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.6% +14.6%
Institutions buying 0 125 108
Institutions selling 0 85 27
Buyers to sellers – 1.47 4.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOOWGOMCFT
DOO 1.00 0.38 0.34
WGO 0.38 1.00 0.53
MCFT 0.34 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOO, WGO and MCFT?

Brp (DOO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brp (DOO) $4.38B, Winnebago Industries (WGO) $802.85M, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) $342.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, DOO, WGO and MCFT?

Winnebago Industries (WGO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brp (DOO) 53.9x, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 23.3x, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -205.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) is cheapest (Brp (DOO) 20.8x, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 13.2x, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) 10.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brp (DOO) +20.2%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -3.4%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) +22.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Winnebago Industries (WGO) has the highest net margin (Brp (DOO) 1.2%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 1.3%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -0.5%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Brp (DOO) 6.0%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brp (DOO) returned the most: Brp (DOO) -13.1%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -30.0%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -14.3%. Over five years, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) compounded fastest (Brp (DOO) -7.7%/yr, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -15.5%/yr, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -5.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brp (DOO) 0.00%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 0.05%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) 0.00%. Brp (DOO) and MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) has been the steadiest (Brp (DOO) 57.8%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 45.8%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) 40.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOO, WGO and MCFT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Winnebago Industries (WGO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.