DOO vs MBUU vs MGA Stock Comparison

Brp, Malibu Boats and Magna International Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DOO BRP Inc.
$59.90 +4.8% 1M -10.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.41B
P/E
54.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
MBUU Malibu Boats, Inc.
$22.28 -7.5% 1M -34.1% 1Y
Market cap
$425.48M
P/E
257.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$914.59M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
MGA Magna International Inc
$64.10 -1.3% 1M +41.2% 1Y
Market cap
$17.98B
P/E
7.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.92B
Div. yield
–
Auto Parts Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Magna International leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Magna International 7, Malibu Boats 2, Brp 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOOMBUUMGALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.41B $425.48M $17.98B MGA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 54.3x 257.4x 7.6x MGA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.3x 8.6x 9.5x MBUU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +13.3% -54.1% DOO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% 0.2% 7.5% MGA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% 0.3% — DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 1.9x — MBUU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.2% -34.1% +41.2% MGA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.7%/yr -20.2%/yr -4.5%/yr MGA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 48.9% 37.0% MGA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 64/100 65/100 MGA

Percentile Scorecard

DOOMBUUMGA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOOMBUUMGA
Valuation 82 #10 of 50 76 #13 of 50 92 #5 of 50
Growth 57 #21 of 48 9 #44 of 48 26 #36 of 48
Profitability 96 #3 of 46 67 #16 of 46 78 #11 of 46
Financial Health 29 #37 of 52 78 #12 of 52 –
Shareholder Returns 24 #23 of 30 93 #3 of 30 66 #11 of 30
Overall 58 64 65
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • MBUU ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • MGA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOOMBUUMGASPY
1 month +4.8%-7.5%-1.3% -0.2%
3 months -4.1%-21.7%-7.1% +3.9%
6 months +12.3%-12.8%+3.5% +8.2%
Year to date -15.3%-21.0%+20.3% +12.9%
1 year -10.2%-34.1%+41.2% +12.3%
3 years -11.2%-50.5%+34.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -3.9%-20.9%+10.4% +23.3%
5 years -33.1%-67.7%-20.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -7.7%-20.2%-4.5% +10.9%
10 years +199.5%+55.3%+57.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +11.6%+4.5%+4.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDOOMBUUMGASPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%48.9%37.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.2%49.4%30.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.951.471.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.18-0.701.11 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.2%-72.1%-65.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.6%-35.6%-12.3% -1.2%
52-week high $81.64$34.61$73.05 $779.14
52-week low $50.93$21.49$44.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOOMBUUMGA
P/E now vs peer median 53.9xmedian 19.4x 260.2xmedian 19.4x 7.6xmedian 19.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.5x 0.5xmedian 0.5x 0.6xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 8.3x 11.1xmedian 8.3x —median 8.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 9.4x 10.0xmedian 9.4x 2.7xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x —median 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -1.06median 1.40 -3.50median 1.40 1.30median 1.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOOMBUUMGA
Revenue $6.74B $914.59M $31.92B
Gross profit $1.39B $146.52M -$4.47B
Operating income $283.70M $3.10M -$5.31B
Net income $81.25M $1.71M $814.00M
Free cash flow $856.16M $42.85M $6.59B
R&D $332.77M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.10 $0.09 $8.42
Cash & equivalents $462.34M $74.42M $1.43B
Total debt $7.25B $165.00M $20.90B
Shares (diluted) 73.90M 19.34M 282.50M
Enterprise value $2.78B $228.58M $12.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOOMBUUMGA
P/E 53.9x 260.2x 7.6x
P/FCF 5.1x 10.0x 2.7x
P/Operating cash flow 4.1x 6.4x 4.0x
P/S 0.6x 0.5x 0.6x
P/B 18.3x 0.8x –
P/Tangible book -37.8x 1.9x –
EV/EBITDA 9.2x 11.1x –
EV/EBIT 20.0x 168.0x -4.0x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.6x 0.7x
EV/FCF 6.6x 12.2x 3.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.3x 7.7x 4.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.06 -3.50 1.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOOMBUUMGA
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 13.3% -54.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.3% -13.0% -7.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.3% 1.7% -113.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.4% -25.3% -42.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.6% -85.8% -116.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.5% -72.2% -55.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -15.6% -88.8% -36.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -52.2% -74.9% -5.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -11.7% -88.7% -5.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.7% -74.3% 5.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.6% 19.5% 35.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% -28.5% 25.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 259.1% 49.9% 1.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% -30.9% 8.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOOMBUUMGA
Gross margin 20.6% 16.0% -14.0%
EBITDA margin 9.1% 5.1% –
Operating margin 4.2% 0.3% -16.6%
Pretax margin 1.8% 0.3% 4.0%
Net margin 1.2% 0.2% 7.5%
FCF margin 12.7% 4.7% 20.7%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% 7.4% 14.2%
Return on equity 21.6% 0.3% –
Return on assets 1.7% 0.2% –
Return on invested capital 6.0% 0.3% –
Return on capital employed 10.1% 0.4% –
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.3x 39.5x 5.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOOMBUUMGA
Debt / assets 37.7% 16.6% –
Debt / equity 7.5x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 1.9x –
Debt / FCF 2.1x 3.9x 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 94.9% 47.0% –
Equity / assets 5.1% 53.0% –
Interest coverage 1.9x 0.9x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.4x –
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.6x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score – 2.28 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOOMBUUMGA
Dividend yield 1.5% – 3.0%
Net buyback yield -0.8% 7.9% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 7.9% 3.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOOMBUUMGA
Forward P/E 21.3xFY2026 8.6xFY2027 9.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.81FY2026 $2.58FY2027 $6.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -26.4%FY2026 +69.7%FY2027 +18.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +31.7% +18.2% +11.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.01BFY2026 $1.17BFY2027 $39.77BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +28.4%FY2027 -4.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% +6.6% +13.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOOMBUUMGA
Held by institutions 41.5% 91.4% –
Institutions holding 143 142 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.7% -32.7% –
Institutions buying 87 90 –
Institutions selling 42 35 –
Buyers to sellers 2.07 2.57 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOOMBUUMGA
DOO 1.00 0.46 0.37
MBUU 0.46 1.00 0.46
MGA 0.37 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOO, MBUU and MGA?

Magna International (MGA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brp (DOO) $4.41B, Malibu Boats (MBUU) $425.48M, Magna International (MGA) $17.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, DOO, MBUU and MGA?

Magna International (MGA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brp (DOO) 54.3x, Malibu Boats (MBUU) 257.4x, Magna International (MGA) 7.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Malibu Boats (MBUU) is cheapest (Brp (DOO) 21.3x, Malibu Boats (MBUU) 8.6x, Magna International (MGA) 9.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Brp (DOO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brp (DOO) +20.2%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) +13.3%, Magna International (MGA) -54.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Magna International (MGA) has the highest net margin (Brp (DOO) 1.2%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) 0.2%, Magna International (MGA) 7.5%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Brp (DOO) 6.0%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) 0.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Magna International (MGA) returned the most: Brp (DOO) -10.2%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) -34.1%, Magna International (MGA) +41.2%. Over five years, Magna International (MGA) compounded fastest (Brp (DOO) -7.7%/yr, Malibu Boats (MBUU) -20.2%/yr, Magna International (MGA) -4.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Magna International (MGA) has been the steadiest (Brp (DOO) 57.8%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) 48.9%, Magna International (MGA) 37.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOO, MBUU and MGA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Magna International (MGA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.