DOO vs HMC vs THO Stock Comparison

Brp, Honda Motor and Thor Industries Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DOO BRP Inc.
$60.40 +6.6% 1M -8.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.42B
P/E
54.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
1.50%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
HMC Honda Motor Co Ltd
$33.68 +3.6% 1M +5.5% 1Y
Market cap
$50.89B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$145.78B
Div. yield
1.93%
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
THO Thor Industries Inc
$71.10 -0.4% 1M -35.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.67B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.61B
Div. yield
2.95%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Honda Motor leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Honda Motor 5, Thor Industries 5, Brp 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOOHMCTHOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.42B $50.89B $3.67B HMC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 54.4x -42.2x 21.0x THO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.5x 12.2x 20.4x HMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +0.8% +0.3% DOO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% -0.7% 1.8% THO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% 0.0% 4.3% DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 4.8x 0.8x THO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.50% 1.93% 2.95% THO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.2% +5.5% -35.1% HMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.3%/yr +2.6%/yr -7.0%/yr HMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 28.6% 39.2% HMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 49/100 62/100 THO

Percentile Scorecard

DOOHMCTHO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOOHMCTHO
Valuation 84 #9 of 50 82 #10 of 50 78 #12 of 50
Growth 56 #22 of 49 35 #32 of 49 15 #42 of 49
Profitability 96 #3 of 47 50 #24 of 47 70 #15 of 47
Financial Health 29 #38 of 53 44 #30 of 53 85 #9 of 53
Shareholder Returns 23 #24 of 31 33 #21 of 31 63 #12 of 31
Overall 58 49 62
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • HMC ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • THO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOOHMCTHOSPY
1 month +6.6%+3.6%-0.4% +0.9%
3 months -1.2%+9.7%-8.9% +5.9%
6 months +12.6%+40.3%-8.6% +8.5%
Year to date -14.6%+14.2%-30.7% +13.3%
1 year -8.2%+5.5%-35.1% +12.4%
3 years -10.5%+7.3%-16.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year -3.6%+2.4%-5.8% +23.5%
5 years -31.5%+13.9%-30.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year -7.3%+2.6%-7.0% +11.0%
10 years +202.0%+12.9%-10.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year +11.7%+1.2%-1.1% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureDOOHMCTHOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%28.6%39.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.5%27.5%41.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.950.940.95 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.140.19-0.89 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.2%-37.7%-50.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.0%-2.6%-40.9% -0.9%
52-week high $81.64$34.59$120.34 $779.14
52-week low $50.93$23.49$63.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOOHMCTHO
P/E now vs peer median 54.4xmedian 20.0x -42.2xmedian 20.0x 21.0xmedian 20.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.5x 0.3xmedian 0.5x 0.4xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 8.7x 10.0xmedian 8.7x 7.1xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 9.4x 6.6xmedian 9.4x 21.7xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 0.9x 0.7xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -1.07median 1.35 1.46median 1.35 -0.98median 1.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOOHMCTHO
Revenue $6.74B $145.78B $9.61B
Gross profit $1.39B $25.18B $1.21B
Operating income $283.70M -$770.90M $309.23M
Net income $81.25M -$573.09M $179.04M
Free cash flow $856.16M $7.66B $168.84M
R&D $332.77M $9.64B –
EPS (diluted) $1.10 $-0.62 $3.38
Cash & equivalents $462.34M $32.71B $481.99M
Total debt $7.25B $342.30B $928.80M
Shares (diluted) 73.90M 1.73B 52.56M
Enterprise value $2.78B -$97.27B $2.06B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOOHMCTHO
P/E 54.4x -42.2x 21.0x
P/FCF 5.2x 6.6x 21.7x
P/Operating cash flow 4.1x 5.9x 11.4x
P/S 0.7x 0.3x 0.4x
P/B 18.5x 0.7x 0.9x
P/Tangible book -38.1x 0.7x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 9.3x 10.0x 7.1x
EV/EBIT 20.1x -127.4x 13.3x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.7x 0.4x
EV/FCF 6.7x 12.8x 24.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.3x 11.3x 12.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.07 1.46 -0.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOOHMCTHO
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 0.8% 0.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 14.0% -4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.3% -17.0% -9.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.4% -1.4% -8.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.6% -111.8% -26.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.5% -27.8% -24.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -15.6% -112.2% -30.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -52.2% -27.5% -21.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -11.7% -124.9% -30.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.7% -29.0% -21.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.6% 183.3% -44.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% -21.9% -31.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 259.1% 2,713% -62.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% -21.6% -39.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOOHMCTHO
Gross margin 20.6% 17.3% 12.6%
EBITDA margin 9.1% 6.8% 6.0%
Operating margin 4.2% -0.5% 3.2%
Pretax margin 1.8% -0.4% 2.5%
Net margin 1.2% -0.7% 1.8%
FCF margin 12.7% 5.3% 1.8%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% 6.0% 3.3%
Return on equity 21.6% -0.8% 4.1%
Return on assets 1.7% -0.3% 2.5%
Return on invested capital 6.0% 0.0% 4.3%
Return on capital employed 10.1% -0.5% 5.6%
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.7x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.3x -15.1x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOOHMCTHO
Debt / assets 37.7% 40.8% 13.4%
Debt / equity 7.5x 1.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 4.8x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 2.1x 11.3x 5.5x
Liabilities / assets 94.9% 63.3% 38.7%
Equity / assets 5.1% 36.7% 61.3%
Interest coverage 1.9x -1.0x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.3x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.6x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 1.40 3.45

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOOHMCTHO
Dividend yield 1.5% 1.9% 3.0%
Net buyback yield -0.8% – 3.1%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 1.9% 6.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 59.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 63.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOOHMCTHO
Forward P/E 21.5xFY2026 12.2xFY2026 20.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $2.81FY2026 $2.77FY2026 $3.49FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -26.4%FY2026 – +3.3%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +31.7% +63.9% +34.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.01BFY2026 $159.46BFY2026 $9.03BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +15.7%FY2026 -6.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% -1.1% +17.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOOHMCTHO
Held by institutions 41.5% 3.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 143 382 409
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.7% -3.2% +2.4%
Institutions buying 87 229 179
Institutions selling 42 95 153
Buyers to sellers 2.07 2.41 1.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOOHMCTHO
DOO 1.00 0.24 0.39
HMC 0.24 1.00 0.41
THO 0.39 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOO, HMC and THO?

Honda Motor (HMC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brp (DOO) $4.42B, Honda Motor (HMC) $50.89B, Thor Industries (THO) $3.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, DOO, HMC and THO?

Thor Industries (THO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brp (DOO) 54.4x, Honda Motor (HMC) -42.2x, Thor Industries (THO) 21.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Honda Motor (HMC) is cheapest (Brp (DOO) 21.5x, Honda Motor (HMC) 12.2x, Thor Industries (THO) 20.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Brp (DOO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brp (DOO) +20.2%, Honda Motor (HMC) +0.8%, Thor Industries (THO) +0.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thor Industries (THO) has the highest net margin (Brp (DOO) 1.2%, Honda Motor (HMC) -0.7%, Thor Industries (THO) 1.8%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Brp (DOO) 6.0%, Honda Motor (HMC) 0.0%, Thor Industries (THO) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Honda Motor (HMC) returned the most: Brp (DOO) -8.2%, Honda Motor (HMC) +5.5%, Thor Industries (THO) -35.1%. Over five years, Honda Motor (HMC) compounded fastest (Brp (DOO) -7.3%/yr, Honda Motor (HMC) +2.6%/yr, Thor Industries (THO) -7.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Thor Industries (THO) has the highest dividend yield: Brp (DOO) 1.50%, Honda Motor (HMC) 1.93%, Thor Industries (THO) 2.95%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Honda Motor (HMC) has been the steadiest (Brp (DOO) 57.8%, Honda Motor (HMC) 28.6%, Thor Industries (THO) 39.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOO, HMC and THO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Honda Motor (HMC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.