DOO vs HMC vs LVWR Stock Comparison

Brp, Honda Motor and LiveWire Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DOO BRP Inc.
$61.61 +7.4% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.51B
P/E
55.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
1.47%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
HMC Honda Motor Co Ltd
$33.90 +5.6% 1M +8.7% 1Y
Market cap
$51.22B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$145.78B
Div. yield
1.92%
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
LVWR LiveWire Group, Inc.
$0.90 -44.4% 1M -83.7% 1Y
Market cap
$184.87M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$33.45M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Honda Motor leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Honda Motor 6, Brp 4, LiveWire 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOOHMCLVWRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.51B $51.22B $184.87M HMC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 55.5x -42.5x -2.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.9x 12.2x — HMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +0.8% +33.4% LVWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% -0.7% — DOO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% 0.0% — DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 4.8x — DOO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.47% 1.92% 0.00% HMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.4% +8.7% -83.7% HMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.9%/yr +2.8%/yr -38.0%/yr HMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 28.5% 162.3% HMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 49/100 33/100 DOO

Percentile Scorecard

DOOHMCLVWR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOOHMCLVWR
Valuation 82 #10 of 50 80 #11 of 50 4 #48 of 50
Growth 52 #24 of 49 33 #33 of 49 88 #7 of 49
Profitability 96 #3 of 46 51 #23 of 46 9 #42 of 46
Financial Health 30 #36 of 51 50 #26 of 51 32 #35 of 51
Shareholder Returns 21 #23 of 29 29 #21 of 29 –
Overall 56 49 33
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • HMC ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • LVWR ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOOHMCLVWRSPY
1 month +7.4%+5.6%-44.4% +0.7%
3 months -1.3%+10.3%-57.9% +3.7%
6 months +10.1%+39.3%-50.5% +7.1%
Year to date -12.9%+15.0%-79.6% +12.8%
1 year -4.4%+8.7%-83.7% +11.9%
3 years -8.2%+10.8%-91.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year -2.8%+3.5%-55.7% +22.8%
5 years -30.1%+14.6%-90.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -6.9%+2.8%-38.0% +10.9%
10 years +208.0%+13.7%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +11.9%+1.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDOOHMCLVWRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%28.5%162.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.7%27.4%147.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.940.941.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.080.30-0.52 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.2%-37.7%-94.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.5%-2.0%-83.7% -1.2%
52-week high $81.64$34.59$5.53 $779.14
52-week low $50.93$23.49$0.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOOHMCLVWR
P/E now vs peer median 55.5xmedian 21.7x -42.5xmedian 21.7x -2.5xmedian 21.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.5x 0.4xmedian 0.5x 5.5xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 8.7x 10.0xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 9.4x 6.7xmedian 9.4x -6.5xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 18.8xmedian 1.0x 0.7xmedian 1.0x -33.5xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median -1.09median 1.36 1.47median 1.36 -0.25median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOOHMCLVWR
Revenue $6.74B $145.78B $33.45M
Gross profit $1.39B $25.18B –
Operating income $283.70M -$770.90M -$70.94M
Net income $81.25M -$573.09M -$72.58M
Free cash flow $856.16M $7.66B –
R&D $332.77M $9.64B –
EPS (diluted) $1.10 $-0.62 $-0.35
Cash & equivalents $462.34M $32.71B $39.92M
Total debt $7.25B $342.30B –
Shares (diluted) 73.90M 1.73B 205.04M
Enterprise value $2.87B -$96.94B $184.87M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOOHMCLVWR
P/E 55.5x -42.5x -2.5x
P/FCF 5.3x 6.7x -6.5x
P/Operating cash flow 4.2x 5.9x -4.0x
P/S 0.7x 0.4x 5.5x
P/B 18.8x 0.7x -33.5x
P/Tangible book -38.8x 0.7x -19.8x
EV/EBITDA 9.5x 10.0x –
EV/EBIT 20.4x -127.9x –
EV/Revenue 0.9x 0.7x 5.5x
EV/FCF 6.8x 12.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 5.4x 11.4x -4.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.09 1.47 -0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOOHMCLVWR
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 0.8% 33.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 14.0% 1.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.3% -17.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.4% -1.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.6% -111.8% 14.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.5% -27.8% 13.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -15.6% -112.2% 9.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -52.2% -27.5% 9.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -11.7% -124.9% 10.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.7% -29.0% 10.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.6% 183.3% 31.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% -21.9% 17.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 259.1% 2,713% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% -21.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOOHMCLVWR
Gross margin 20.6% 17.3% –
EBITDA margin 9.1% 6.8% –
Operating margin 4.2% -0.5% –
Pretax margin 1.8% -0.4% –
Net margin 1.2% -0.7% –
FCF margin 12.7% 5.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% 6.0% -138.2%
Return on equity 21.6% -0.8% –
Return on assets 1.7% -0.3% –
Return on invested capital 6.0% 0.0% –
Return on capital employed 10.1% -0.5% –
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.3x -15.1x 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 14.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOOHMCLVWR
Debt / assets 37.7% 40.8% –
Debt / equity 7.5x 1.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 4.8x –
Debt / FCF 2.1x 11.3x –
Liabilities / assets 94.9% 63.3% 105.3%
Equity / assets 5.1% 36.7% -5.3%
Interest coverage 1.9x -1.0x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.3x 3.1x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.6x –
Altman Z-score – 1.40 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOOHMCLVWR
Dividend yield 1.5% 1.9% –
Net buyback yield -0.8% – –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 1.9% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOOHMCLVWR
Forward P/E 21.9xFY2026 12.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.81FY2026 $2.77FY2026 $-0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -26.4%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +31.7% +63.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.01BFY2026 $159.46BFY2026 $192.71MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +15.7%FY2026 +650.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% -1.1% +277.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOOHMCLVWR
Held by institutions 41.5% 3.5% 2.0%
Institutions holding 143 383 62
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.7% -3.2% +4.1%
Institutions buying 87 230 32
Institutions selling 42 95 20
Buyers to sellers 2.07 2.42 1.60

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOOHMCLVWR
DOO 1.00 0.24 0.09
HMC 0.24 1.00 0.21
LVWR 0.09 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOO, HMC and LVWR?

Honda Motor (HMC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brp (DOO) $4.51B, Honda Motor (HMC) $51.22B, LiveWire (LVWR) $184.87M.

Which company is growing faster?

LiveWire (LVWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brp (DOO) +20.2%, Honda Motor (HMC) +0.8%, LiveWire (LVWR) +33.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brp (DOO) has the highest net margin (Brp (DOO) 1.2%, Honda Motor (HMC) -0.7%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Brp (DOO) 6.0%, Honda Motor (HMC) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Honda Motor (HMC) returned the most: Brp (DOO) -4.4%, Honda Motor (HMC) +8.7%, LiveWire (LVWR) -83.7%. Over five years, Honda Motor (HMC) compounded fastest (Brp (DOO) -6.9%/yr, Honda Motor (HMC) +2.8%/yr, LiveWire (LVWR) -38.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Honda Motor (HMC) has the highest dividend yield: Brp (DOO) 1.47%, Honda Motor (HMC) 1.92%, LiveWire (LVWR) 0.00%. LiveWire (LVWR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Honda Motor (HMC) has been the steadiest (Brp (DOO) 57.8%, Honda Motor (HMC) 28.5%, LiveWire (LVWR) 162.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOO, HMC and LVWR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Honda Motor (HMC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.