DOGZ vs SJM vs CAG Stock Comparison

Dogness (International), J M Smucker and Conagra Brands Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SJM J M SMUCKER Co
$126.26 +4.6% 1M +24.8% 1Y
Market cap
$13.49B
P/E
58.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.16B
Div. yield
3.50%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
8 wins
CAG Conagra Brands Inc.
$14.10 -0.1% 1M -18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.73B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$11.24B
Div. yield
8.65%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

J M Smucker leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (J M Smucker 8, Conagra Brands 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOGZSJMCAGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.69M $13.49B $6.73B SJM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.4x 58.8x -3.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.1x 9.4x CAG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +5.1% -1.8% SJM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 2.5% -17.0% SJM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.6% -12.3% SJM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.9x 3.9x CAG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.50% 8.65% CAG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -94.9% +24.8% -18.9% SJM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -62.2%/yr +0.5%/yr -15.2%/yr SJM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 172.2% 28.5% 31.8% SJM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 58/100 50/100 SJM

Percentile Scorecard

DOGZSJMCAG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOGZSJMCAG
Valuation 55 #21 of 45 59 #19 of 45 84 #8 of 45
Growth – 95 #3 of 42 5 #40 of 42
Profitability – 82 #8 of 40 41 #24 of 40
Financial Health 89 #6 of 47 28 #34 of 47 37 #30 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 27 #23 of 31 83 #6 of 31
Overall – 58 50
  • DOGZ ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • SJM ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • CAG ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOGZSJMCAGSPY
1 month -31.8%+4.6%-0.1% +0.7%
3 months -31.8%+3.3%-6.3% +3.7%
6 months -50.8%+28.8%-1.7% +7.1%
Year to date -94.3%+29.1%-18.5% +12.8%
1 year -94.9%+24.8%-18.9% +11.9%
3 years -89.4%+11.1%-48.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year -52.7%+3.6%-19.7% +22.8%
5 years -99.2%+2.8%-56.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year -62.2%+0.5%-15.2% +10.9%
10 years —-4.3%-62.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year —-0.4%-9.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDOGZSJMCAGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 172.2%28.5%31.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 223.8%24.7%31.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.53-0.31-0.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.550.87-0.59 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.7%-44.9%-69.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -95.3%-5.4%-29.6% -1.2%
52-week high $12.71$133.40$20.02 $779.14
52-week low $0.60$89.53$12.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOGZSJMCAG
P/E now vs peer median -0.4xmedian 18.4x 58.8xmedian 18.4x -3.5xmedian 18.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 0.7x 0.6xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.0x 14.7xmedian 12.0x 7.5xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.4xmedian 13.6x 8.5xmedian 13.6x 5.8xmedian 13.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.6x 2.3xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.55 0.29median 0.55 0.06median 0.55

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOGZSJMCAG
Revenue – $9.16B $11.24B
Gross profit – $3.54B $2.68B
Operating income – $826.20M -$1.71B
Net income – $229.50M -$1.91B
Free cash flow – $1.59B $1.15B
EPS (diluted) – $2.14 $-3.97
Cash & equivalents $4.49M $43.20M $371.60M
Total debt $16.00M $6.74B $7.76B
Shares (diluted) 17.81M 107.10M 480.00M
Enterprise value -$19.32M $13.27B $6.04B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOGZSJMCAG
P/E -0.4x 58.8x -3.5x
P/FCF -1.4x 8.5x 5.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.1x 5.3x
P/S 0.7x 1.5x 0.6x
P/B 0.1x 2.3x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 0.1x 107.2x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – 14.7x 7.5x
EV/EBIT – 24.4x -8.3x
EV/Revenue – 2.2x 1.3x
EV/FCF – 12.7x 12.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 10.6x 11.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.29 0.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOGZSJMCAG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 5.1% -1.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.7% -2.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.6% -7.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 6.8% -7.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 184.5% -230.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 43.2% -39.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – 115.7% -324.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 147.2% -55.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 131.3% -324.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 200.5% -55.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 86.0% -17.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.6% 2.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 136.2% -17.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 20.3% 13.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOGZSJMCAG
Gross margin – 38.7% 23.8%
EBITDA margin – 15.0% 16.8%
Operating margin – 9.0% -15.2%
Pretax margin – 4.6% -16.7%
Net margin – 2.5% -17.0%
FCF margin – 17.3% 10.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 20.9% 11.4%
Return on equity – 4.1% -29.9%
Return on assets – 1.4% -10.9%
Return on invested capital – 3.6% -12.3%
Return on capital employed – 5.9% -11.8%
Asset turnover – 0.6x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 8.3x -0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOGZSJMCAG
Debt / assets 3.8% 41.6% 43.8%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.9x 3.9x
Debt / FCF – 4.2x 6.7x
Liabilities / assets 20.3% 64.5% 63.8%
Equity / assets 79.7% 35.5% 36.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.1x 0.9x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 1.49 1.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOGZSJMCAG
Dividend yield – 3.5% 8.7%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 0.9%
Shareholder yield – 3.6% 9.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 203.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 29.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 2.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOGZSJMCAG
Forward P/E – 11.1xFY2026 9.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $11.33FY2026 $1.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +23.8%FY2026 -12.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -8.3% -2.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $9.52BFY2026 $10.36BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +5.2%FY2026 -8.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -2.7% +1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOGZSJMCAG
Held by institutions – 43.8% 88.4%
Institutions holding – 889 786
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.8% +3.9%
Institutions buying – 495 487
Institutions selling – 260 207
Buyers to sellers – 1.90 2.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOGZSJMCAG
DOGZ 1.00 -0.03 -0.11
SJM -0.03 1.00 0.55
CAG -0.11 0.55 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOGZ, SJM and CAG?

J M Smucker (SJM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Dogness (International) (DOGZ) $10.69M, J M Smucker (SJM) $13.49B, Conagra Brands (CAG) $6.73B.

Which company is growing faster?

J M Smucker (SJM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: J M Smucker (SJM) +5.1%, Conagra Brands (CAG) -1.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

J M Smucker (SJM) has the highest net margin (J M Smucker (SJM) 2.5%, Conagra Brands (CAG) -17.0%). On return on invested capital, J M Smucker (SJM) leads (J M Smucker (SJM) 3.6%, Conagra Brands (CAG) -12.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year J M Smucker (SJM) returned the most: Dogness (International) (DOGZ) -94.9%, J M Smucker (SJM) +24.8%, Conagra Brands (CAG) -18.9%. Over five years, J M Smucker (SJM) compounded fastest (Dogness (International) (DOGZ) -62.2%/yr, J M Smucker (SJM) +0.5%/yr, Conagra Brands (CAG) -15.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Conagra Brands (CAG) has the highest dividend yield: J M Smucker (SJM) 3.50%, Conagra Brands (CAG) 8.65%. Dogness (International) (DOGZ) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, J M Smucker (SJM) has been the steadiest (Dogness (International) (DOGZ) 172.2%, J M Smucker (SJM) 28.5%, Conagra Brands (CAG) 31.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOGZ, SJM and CAG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, J M Smucker (SJM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.