DNA vs ICLR vs NTRB Stock Comparison

Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Icon and NutriBand Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ICLR Icon Plc
$182.98 +6.2% 1M +0.5% 1Y
Market cap
$15.87B
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.23B
Div. yield
–
Contract Research Healthcare
6 wins
NTRB NutriBand Inc.
$5.95 -25.6% 1M -15.4% 1Y
Market cap
$72.33M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Icon leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Icon 6, NutriBand 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDNAICLRNTRBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $784.17M $15.87B $72.33M ICLR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.7x 35.4x -10.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.9x 3.6x NTRB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -46.8% +1.8% -37.3% ICLR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -260.0% 5.4% -430.4% ICLR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.7% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.3x 0.5x NTRB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -15.8% +0.5% -15.4% ICLR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -54.4%/yr -8.6%/yr +2.7%/yr NTRB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 101.5% 73.7% 80.0% ICLR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 81/100 50/100 ICLR

Percentile Scorecard

DNAICLRNTRB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDNAICLRNTRB
Valuation 10 #10 of 11 100 #1 of 11 53 #295 of 625
Growth 50 #6 of 11 70 #4 of 11 43 #345 of 602
Profitability 10 #10 of 11 80 #3 of 11 36 #356 of 551
Financial Health 100 #1 of 13 75 #4 of 13 68 #210 of 656
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 43 81 50
  • DNA ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services
  • ICLR ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services
  • NTRB ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDNAICLRNTRBSPY
1 month +5.7%+6.2%-25.6% -0.2%
3 months +46.4%+1.5%+101.7% +3.9%
6 months +43.6%+78.5%+58.2% +8.2%
Year to date +35.6%+0.4%+31.1% +12.9%
1 year -15.8%+0.5%-15.4% +12.3%
3 years -79.1%-22.2%+182.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -40.7%-8.0%+41.3% +23.3%
5 years -98.0%-36.1%+14.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -54.4%-8.6%+2.7% +10.9%
10 years —+127.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+8.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDNAICLRNTRBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 101.5%73.7%80.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 103.1%87.6%75.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.031.441.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.160.01-0.19 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.1%-76.9%-77.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.8%-9.8%-33.8% -1.2%
52-week high $14.98$202.92$8.99 $779.14
52-week low $5.48$80.08$2.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDNAICLRNTRB
P/E now vs peer median -2.4xmedian 32.1x 32.0xmedian 32.1x -10.4xmedian 17.2x
P/S now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 2.6x 1.7xmedian 2.6x 44.7xmedian 9.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 38.1x 15.2xmedian 38.1x -10.0xmedian 16.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.1xmedian 21.5x 16.3xmedian 21.5x -19.9xmedian 18.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 3.1x 1.5xmedian 3.1x 13.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.02median 2.03 -13.47median 2.03 -12.65median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDNAICLRNTRB
Revenue $111.86M $8.23B $1.62M
Gross profit $92.92M $1.93B $536.12K
Operating income -$290.69M $718.25M -$7.05M
Net income -$290.80M $448.66M -$6.96M
Free cash flow -$174.80M $857.06M -$3.63M
R&D $215.61M – $1.21M
EPS (diluted) $-5.24 $5.68 $-0.57
Cash & equivalents $84.54M $808.98M $3.42M
Total debt – $3.38B $647.66K
Shares (diluted) 55.46M 78.97M 12.16M
Enterprise value $22.09M $12.64B $55.01M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDNAICLRNTRB
P/E -2.4x 32.0x -10.4x
P/FCF -4.1x 16.3x -19.9x
P/Operating cash flow -4.2x 13.6x -19.9x
P/S 6.4x 1.7x 44.7x
P/B 1.7x 1.5x 13.6x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 2.3x 14.0x
EV/EBITDA -2.7x 15.2x -10.0x
EV/EBIT -2.2x 23.1x -9.8x
EV/Revenue 5.7x 2.0x 42.7x
EV/FCF -3.6x 19.3x -19.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.7x 16.1x -19.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.02 -13.47 -12.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDNAICLRNTRB
Revenue growth (1Y) -46.8% 1.8% -37.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -30.0% 0.9% -10.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -49.3% -13.4% -39.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -28.2% -6.5% -16.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 2.4% 53.9% 32.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.1% -7.0% -15.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.7% 55.9% 32.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.0% -4.4% -14.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.7% 30.1% 80.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -102.3% -2.4% 0.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.4% -9.9% 25.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.9% 15.8% -5.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 36.2% -11.1% 26.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.1% 18.4% -5.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDNAICLRNTRB
Gross margin 83.1% 23.4% 33.1%
EBITDA margin -211.6% 13.3% -426.5%
Operating margin -259.9% 8.7% -435.6%
Pretax margin -264.1% 6.3% -430.4%
Net margin -260.0% 5.4% -430.4%
FCF margin -156.3% 10.4% -224.5%
Operating cash flow margin -152.2% 12.5% -224.5%
Return on equity -67.4% 7.6% -123.0%
Return on assets -28.7% 4.3% -105.6%
Return on invested capital – 4.7% –
Return on capital employed -31.0% 5.3% -123.9%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 2.3x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 61.5% 1.1% 204.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDNAICLRNTRB
Debt / assets – 20.8% 2.4%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.3x 0.5x
Debt / FCF – 3.9x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 57.5% 43.8% 15.3%
Equity / assets 42.5% 56.2% 84.7%
Interest coverage – 3.4x -339.3x
Current ratio 4.6x 1.3x 4.2x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.9x 3.8x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.3x 3.8x
Altman Z-score -8.66 2.07 31.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDNAICLRNTRB
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 2.7% –
Shareholder yield – 2.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDNAICLRNTRB
Forward P/E – 17.9xFY2026 3.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-4.06FY2026 $10.25FY2026 $1.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -18.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +22.2% +112.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $88.21MFY2026 $8.52BFY2026 $90.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -48.2%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026 +4,334.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.8% -3.2% +109.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDNAICLRNTRB
Held by institutions 55.2% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 182 422 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.3% +5.5% –
Institutions buying 100 233 –
Institutions selling 39 138 –
Buyers to sellers 2.56 1.69 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DNAICLRNTRB
DNA 1.00 0.22 0.09
ICLR 0.22 1.00 0.16
NTRB 0.09 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DNA, ICLR and NTRB?

Icon (ICLR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) $784.17M, Icon (ICLR) $15.87B, NutriBand (NTRB) $72.33M.

Which company is growing faster?

Icon (ICLR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) -46.8%, Icon (ICLR) +1.8%, NutriBand (NTRB) -37.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Icon (ICLR) has the highest net margin (Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) -260.0%, Icon (ICLR) 5.4%, NutriBand (NTRB) -430.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icon (ICLR) returned the most: Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) -15.8%, Icon (ICLR) +0.5%, NutriBand (NTRB) -15.4%. Over five years, NutriBand (NTRB) compounded fastest (Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) -54.4%/yr, Icon (ICLR) -8.6%/yr, NutriBand (NTRB) +2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Icon (ICLR) has been the steadiest (Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) 101.5%, Icon (ICLR) 73.7%, NutriBand (NTRB) 80.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DNA, ICLR and NTRB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Icon (ICLR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.