DIN vs BLMN vs DRI Stock Comparison

Dine Brands Global, Bloomin' Brands and Darden Restaurants Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.
$32.02 +13.6% 1M +19.1% 1Y
Market cap
$405.73M
P/E
61.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$899.84M
Div. yield
2.37%
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
$9.08 +15.2% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$777.38M
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
DRI Darden Restaurants Inc
$213.93 +7.1% 1M +16.5% 1Y
Market cap
$24.20B
P/E
20.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.37B
Div. yield
2.92%
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
10 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Darden Restaurants leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Darden Restaurants 10, Dine Brands Global 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDINBLMNDRILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $405.73M $777.38M $24.20B DRI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 61.0x 28.1x 20.6x DRI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.1x 9.9x 18.0x DIN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.4% +1.2% +8.1% DRI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.7% 0.7% 8.8% DRI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.9% 4.2% 32.9% DRI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 14.7x 2.5x 1.1x DRI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.37% 0.00% 2.92% DRI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.1% +17.9% +16.5% DIN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.5%/yr -15.7%/yr +8.1%/yr DRI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.4% 74.6% 27.9% DRI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 42/100 48/100 DRI

Percentile Scorecard

DINBLMNDRI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDINBLMNDRI
Valuation 22 #39 of 50 86 #8 of 50 31 #35 of 50
Growth 0 #47 of 47 33 #32 of 47 26 #35 of 47
Profitability 27 #34 of 46 44 #26 of 46 80 #10 of 46
Financial Health 12 #45 of 51 18 #42 of 51 28 #37 of 51
Shareholder Returns 41 #20 of 33 28 #24 of 33 75 #9 of 33
Overall 20 42 48
  • DIN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • BLMN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • DRI ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDINBLMNDRISPY
1 month +13.6%+15.2%+7.1% -0.2%
3 months -11.2%+5.6%+3.3% +3.9%
6 months +16.1%+50.6%+8.9% +8.2%
Year to date -0.4%+47.2%+16.3% +12.9%
1 year +19.1%+17.9%+16.5% +12.3%
3 years -34.5%-60.9%+50.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -13.1%-26.9%+14.5% +23.3%
5 years -61.8%-57.5%+47.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year -17.5%-15.7%+8.1% +10.9%
10 years -59.0%-46.3%+247.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year -8.5%-6.0%+13.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDINBLMNDRISPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.4%74.6%27.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.4%63.3%28.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.541.190.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.430.240.59 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -79.9%-82.3%-28.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.5%-23.4%-6.1% -1.2%
52-week high $38.81$11.85$227.72 $779.14
52-week low $24.15$5.26$169.21 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDINBLMNDRI
P/E now vs peer median 61.0xmedian 20.6x 28.1xmedian 20.6x 20.6xmedian 20.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 1.2x 0.2xmedian 1.2x 1.8xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.2xmedian 13.3x 5.6xmedian 13.3x 12.5xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 64.4xmedian 17.3x 5.0xmedian 17.3x 23.5xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median -1.4xmedian 3.1x 1.8xmedian 3.1x 11.7xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -1.16median 1.07 -0.56median 1.07 2.38median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDINBLMNDRI
Revenue $899.84M $3.98B $13.37B
Gross profit $355.26M $2.79B $4.46B
Operating income $24.72M $47.65M $1.56B
Net income $6.79M $32.19M $1.18B
Free cash flow $6.30M $155.17M $1.03B
EPS (diluted) $0.52 $0.32 $10.33
Cash & equivalents $97.50M $66.61M $220.50M
Total debt $1.19B $702.79M $2.62B
Shares (diluted) 12.10M 86.22M 114.40M
Enterprise value -$92.17M $516.76M $23.30B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDINBLMNDRI
P/E 61.0x 28.1x 20.6x
P/FCF 64.4x 5.0x 23.5x
P/Operating cash flow 7.3x 2.4x 13.5x
P/S 0.5x 0.2x 1.8x
P/B -1.4x 1.8x 11.7x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 66.4x 33.5x
EV/EBITDA 20.2x 5.6x 12.5x
EV/EBIT 60.6x 29.7x 17.0x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 0.4x 2.0x
EV/FCF 237.7x 9.1x 25.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.8x 4.4x 14.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.16 -0.56 2.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDINBLMNDRI
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.4% 1.2% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.4% 0.7% 7.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.6% 0.2% -32.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.1% 1.7% -7.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -58.8% -57.4% 9.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.1% -45.7% 8.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -85.3% 2,049% 7.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -55.7% -49.9% 6.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -82.6% 648.7% 10.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -52.8% -50.0% 8.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -48.9% 36.1% 0.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.3% -11.4% 8.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -93.2% 305.4% -4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -51.9% -8.3% 10.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDINBLMNDRI
Gross margin 39.5% 70.1% 33.4%
EBITDA margin 8.3% 6.3% 16.0%
Operating margin 2.7% 1.2% 11.7%
Pretax margin 1.1% 0.0% 10.2%
Net margin 0.7% 0.7% 8.8%
FCF margin 0.7% 3.9% 7.7%
Operating cash flow margin 6.2% 8.0% 13.4%
Return on equity – 7.9% 55.3%
Return on assets 0.4% 1.1% 9.1%
Return on invested capital 1.9% 4.2% 32.9%
Return on capital employed 1.8% 2.1% 15.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.3x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 8.2x 9.9x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 0.3% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDINBLMNDRI
Debt / assets 67.1% 22.5% 19.8%
Debt / equity -4.1x 1.6x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 14.7x 2.5x 1.1x
Debt / FCF 188.8x 4.5x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 116.5% 86.0% 84.4%
Equity / assets -16.5% 14.0% 15.6%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x 0.3x 0.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.78 0.89 2.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDINBLMNDRI
Dividend yield 2.4% 0.0% 2.9%
Net buyback yield 20.3% – 2.8%
Shareholder yield 22.7% 0.0% 5.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 294.6% 39.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 317.5% 8.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -80.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -14.6% -42.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDINBLMNDRI
Forward P/E 7.1xFY2026 9.9xFY2026 18.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.51FY2026 $0.92FY2026 $11.87FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.3%FY2026 -18.6%FY2026 +11.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.9% +16.3% +7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $924.09MFY2026 $3.75BFY2026 $14.53BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.1%FY2026 -5.4%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.6% +3.2% -3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDINBLMNDRI
Held by institutions 97.9% 100.0% 97.6%
Institutions holding 149 234 1,083
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.2% +6.7% +1.9%
Institutions buying 67 123 578
Institutions selling 53 76 325
Buyers to sellers 1.26 1.62 1.78

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DINBLMNDRI
DIN 1.00 0.45 0.51
BLMN 0.45 1.00 0.52
DRI 0.51 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DIN, BLMN and DRI?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Dine Brands Global (DIN) $405.73M, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) $777.38M, Darden Restaurants (DRI) $24.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, DIN, BLMN and DRI?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 61.0x, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 28.1x, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 20.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dine Brands Global (DIN) is cheapest (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 7.1x, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 9.9x, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 18.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dine Brands Global (DIN) +6.4%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +1.2%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) has the highest net margin (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 0.7%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.7%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 8.8%). On return on invested capital, Darden Restaurants (DRI) leads (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 1.9%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 4.2%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 32.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dine Brands Global (DIN) returned the most: Dine Brands Global (DIN) +19.1%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +17.9%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) +16.5%. Over five years, Darden Restaurants (DRI) compounded fastest (Dine Brands Global (DIN) -17.5%/yr, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) -15.7%/yr, Darden Restaurants (DRI) +8.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) has the highest dividend yield: Dine Brands Global (DIN) 2.37%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.00%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 2.92%. Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Darden Restaurants (DRI) has been the steadiest (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 44.4%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 74.6%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 27.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DIN, BLMN and DRI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Darden Restaurants (DRI) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.