DECK vs SHOO vs WWW Stock Comparison

Deckers Outdoor, Steven Madden and Wolverine World Wide Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corp
$80.39 +2.2% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$11.60B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Footwear Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
SHOO Steven Madden, Ltd.
$42.76 -5.1% 1M +20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.05B
P/E
21.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.74B
Div. yield
–
Footwear Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Deckers Outdoor leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Deckers Outdoor 4, Wolverine World Wide 3, Steven Madden 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDECKSHOOWWWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.60B $3.05B $1.62B DECK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 21.3x 14.1x WWW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.7x 21.0x 11.6x DECK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +18.2% +8.1% SHOO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 5.2% 5.8% WWW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.5% 13.6% WWW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.5% +20.0% -22.5% SHOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.1%/yr -0.8%/yr -8.9%/yr DECK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.8% 41.2% 55.5% DECK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 61/100 54/100 SHOO

Percentile Scorecard

DECKSHOOWWW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDECKSHOOWWW
Valuation – 56 #21 of 46 62 #18 of 46
Growth – 67 #15 of 43 64 #16 of 43
Profitability – 66 #15 of 42 68 #14 of 42
Financial Health 89 #7 of 53 79 #12 of 53 35 #35 of 53
Shareholder Returns – 39 #21 of 34 42 #20 of 34
Overall – 61 54
  • DECK ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • SHOO ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • WWW ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDECKSHOOWWWSPY
1 month +2.2%-5.1%+6.2% -0.8%
3 months -17.7%-1.8%+6.3% +3.5%
6 months -24.7%+13.0%+16.0% +7.0%
Year to date -22.5%+2.7%+11.6% +12.2%
1 year -7.5%+20.0%-22.5% +13.0%
3 years -16.3%+34.8%+150.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year -5.8%+10.5%+35.9% +23.1%
5 years +28.2%-4.1%-37.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +5.1%-0.8%-8.9% +11.0%
10 years +833.7%+97.1%-3.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +25.0%+7.0%-0.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureDECKSHOOWWWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.8%41.2%55.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.8%38.6%59.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.071.511.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.180.49-0.41 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.2%-61.9%-80.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.5%-12.9%-18.5% -1.8%
52-week high $120.94$49.07$24.85 $779.14
52-week low $77.68$31.37$14.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDECKSHOOWWW
P/E now vs peer median —median 16.6x 21.3xmedian 16.6x 14.5xmedian 16.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.7x 1.1xmedian 0.7x 0.8xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.7x 12.9xmedian 9.7x —median 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.2x 14.0xmedian 12.2x —median 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.2x 3.2xmedian 2.2x 3.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 -6.47median 0.64 0.43median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDECKSHOOWWW
Revenue – $2.74B $1.97B
Gross profit – $1.26B $925.90M
Operating income – $205.59M $176.50M
Net income – $146.04M $120.70M
Free cash flow – $224.27M –
EPS (diluted) – $1.99 $1.41
Cash & equivalents $1.91B $94.74M $158.50M
Total debt – $124.83M $601.10M
Shares (diluted) 144.29M 72.16M 81.70M
Enterprise value $4.47B $2.66B $980.62M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDECKSHOOWWW
P/E – 21.3x 14.5x
P/FCF – 14.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – 11.9x –
P/S – 1.1x 0.8x
P/B 4.6x 3.2x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 4.5x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA – 12.9x –
EV/EBIT – 15.4x 11.9x
EV/Revenue – 1.2x 1.1x
EV/FCF – 14.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -6.47 0.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDECKSHOOWWW
Revenue growth (1Y) – 18.2% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.3% -8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 33.5% 11.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 15.8% -1.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 52.8% 32.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% 37.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 50.6% 34.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -4.1% 34.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – 54.6% 33.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -3.3% 33.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 73.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 90.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -8.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDECKSHOOWWW
Gross margin – 46.1% 47.0%
EBITDA margin – 8.9% –
Operating margin – 7.5% 9.0%
Pretax margin – 7.0% 7.5%
Net margin – 5.2% 5.8%
FCF margin – 8.2% –
Operating cash flow margin – 9.6% –
Return on equity – 15.2% 27.1%
Return on assets – 7.7% 7.1%
Return on invested capital – 13.5% 13.6%
Return on capital employed – 14.6% 14.3%
Asset turnover – 1.4x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDECKSHOOWWW
Debt / assets – 6.8% 35.2%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.1x –
Debt / FCF – 0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 32.2% 47.1% 72.6%
Equity / assets 67.8% 52.9% 27.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.5x 1.9x 1.5x
Quick ratio 2.8x 1.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 2.4x 0.2x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 5.73 3.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDECKSHOOWWW
Dividend yield – 2.0% 2.0%
Net buyback yield – 0.3% –
Shareholder yield – 2.3% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDECKSHOOWWW
Forward P/E 10.7xFY2026 21.0xFY2026 11.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.48FY2026 $2.04FY2026 $1.74FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.6%FY2026 +20.0%FY2026 +28.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +4.3% +38.7% +8.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.37BFY2026 $2.79BFY2026 $1.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.9%FY2026 +10.6%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.4% +6.0% +1.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDECKSHOOWWW
Held by institutions 96.4% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 860 301 243
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% -2.2% +0.7%
Institutions buying 426 181 126
Institutions selling 333 80 76
Buyers to sellers 1.28 2.26 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DECKSHOOWWW
DECK 1.00 0.45 0.45
SHOO 0.45 1.00 0.19
WWW 0.45 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DECK, SHOO and WWW?

Deckers Outdoor (DECK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Deckers Outdoor (DECK) $11.60B, Steven Madden (SHOO) $3.05B, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) $1.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, DECK, SHOO and WWW?

Wolverine World Wide (WWW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Steven Madden (SHOO) 21.3x, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) 14.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Deckers Outdoor (DECK) is cheapest (Deckers Outdoor (DECK) 10.7x, Steven Madden (SHOO) 21.0x, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) 11.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Steven Madden (SHOO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Steven Madden (SHOO) +18.2%, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Wolverine World Wide (WWW) has the highest net margin (Steven Madden (SHOO) 5.2%, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) 5.8%). On return on invested capital, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) leads (Steven Madden (SHOO) 13.5%, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) 13.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Steven Madden (SHOO) returned the most: Deckers Outdoor (DECK) -7.5%, Steven Madden (SHOO) +20.0%, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) -22.5%. Over five years, Deckers Outdoor (DECK) compounded fastest (Deckers Outdoor (DECK) +5.1%/yr, Steven Madden (SHOO) -0.8%/yr, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) -8.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Deckers Outdoor (DECK) has been the steadiest (Deckers Outdoor (DECK) 40.8%, Steven Madden (SHOO) 41.2%, Wolverine World Wide (WWW) 55.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DECK, SHOO and WWW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Deckers Outdoor (DECK) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.