DBX vs TEAM vs MSFT Stock Comparison

Dropbox, Atlassian and Microsoft Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DBX Dropbox, Inc.
$37.73 +16.7% 1M +28.5% 1Y
Market cap
$8.30B
P/E
18.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.53B
Div. yield
–
Productivity Software Technology
3 wins
TEAM Atlassian Corp
$223.41 +19.0% 1M +37.4% 1Y
Market cap
$57.06B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.57B
Div. yield
–
Productivity Software Technology
3 wins
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$532.60 +3.2% 1M +1.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.95T
P/E
29.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$331.84B
Div. yield
0.01%
Cloud Platforms Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 5, Dropbox 3, Atlassian 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDBXTEAMMSFTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.30B $57.06B $3.95T MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.7x -1,060x 29.5x DBX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.8x 39.7x 26.1x DBX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months 0.0% +26.0% +17.8% TEAM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.5% -0.8% 40.3% MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 104.6% 0.0% 26.7% DBX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x -1.7x -0.2x TEAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.5% +37.4% +1.7% TEAM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.7%/yr -11.6%/yr +10.5%/yr MSFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.1% 75.2% 32.8% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 42/100 79/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

DBXTEAMMSFT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDBXTEAMMSFT
Valuation 57 #13 of 29 4 #28 of 29 57 #17 of 38
Growth 8 #25 of 27 77 #7 of 27 77 #9 of 36
Profitability 96 #2 of 26 32 #18 of 26 97 #2 of 34
Financial Health 17 #26 of 31 40 #19 of 31 84 #7 of 38
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 17 56 #8 of 17 80 #5 of 21
Overall 56 42 79
  • DBX ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • TEAM ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDBXTEAMMSFTSPY
1 month +16.7%+19.0%+3.2% -0.8%
3 months +23.5%+133.0%+36.9% +3.5%
6 months +57.8%+222.8%+25.4% +7.0%
Year to date +35.7%+37.8%+10.1% +12.2%
1 year +28.5%+37.4%+1.7% +13.0%
3 years +45.5%+26.6%+61.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +13.3%+8.2%+17.3% +23.1%
5 years +25.8%-45.9%+64.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year +4.7%-11.6%+10.5% +11.0%
10 years —+676.5%+778.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+22.8%+24.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureDBXTEAMMSFTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.1%75.2%32.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.1%63.4%30.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.230.811.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.750.500.05 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.8%-87.5%-37.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.3%-1.8%-2.0% -1.8%
52-week high $37.83$227.61$543.45 $779.14
52-week low $22.06$57.15$352.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDBXTEAMMSFT
P/E now vs peer median 19.2xmedian 31.9x -1,080xmedian 31.9x 29.6xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.4x 8.8xmedian 2.4x 11.9xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 11.5x 402.3xmedian 11.5x 19.7xmedian 24.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 14.2x 44.1xmedian 14.2x 59.1xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median -3.8xmedian 3.0x 54.9xmedian 3.0x 8.9xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.22median 0.77 -20.67median 0.77 1.30median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDBXTEAMMSFT
Revenue $2.53B $6.57B $331.84B
Gross profit $2.02B $5.58B $225.47B
Operating income $674.50M $10.36M $155.24B
Net income $442.80M -$53.83M $133.75B
Free cash flow $957.10M $1.32B $66.99B
R&D $741.50M $3.27B $35.56B
EPS (diluted) $1.95 $-0.21 $17.95
Cash & equivalents $1.06B $1.24B $20.94B
Total debt $2.61B $989.56M $40.29B
Shares (diluted) 226.80M 260.16M 7.45B
Enterprise value $3.93B $50.33B $3.87T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDBXTEAMMSFT
P/E 19.2x -1,080x 29.6x
P/FCF 8.7x 44.1x 59.1x
P/Operating cash flow 8.5x 43.0x 21.6x
P/S 3.3x 8.8x 11.9x
P/B -3.8x 54.9x 8.9x
P/Tangible book -3.7x 92.8x 9.3x
EV/EBITDA 11.5x 402.3x 19.7x
EV/EBIT 14.5x 5,589x 25.2x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 8.8x 11.8x
EV/FCF 10.2x 43.9x 58.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.0x 42.8x 21.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.22 -20.67 1.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDBXTEAMMSFT
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.0% 26.0% 17.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 23.0% 16.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -2.0% 29.0% 16.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.0% 24.3% 15.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.8% 107.9% 20.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 65.2% 26.6% 20.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -8.8% 79.0% 31.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.4% 52.0% 22.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.3% 78.9% 31.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.6% 52.2% 22.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 8.7% -7.3% 34.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 15.9% 27.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 7.2% -6.8% -6.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.5% 16.1% 4.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDBXTEAMMSFT
Gross margin 79.7% 84.8% 67.9%
EBITDA margin 33.7% 2.2% 59.9%
Operating margin 26.6% 0.2% 46.8%
Pretax margin 22.1% 0.3% 50.0%
Net margin 17.5% -0.8% 40.3%
FCF margin 37.8% 20.1% 20.2%
Operating cash flow margin 38.7% 20.6% 55.1%
Return on equity – -5.6% 31.2%
Return on assets 15.1% -0.9% 18.4%
Return on invested capital 104.6% 0.0% 26.7%
Return on capital employed 38.5% 0.4% 27.8%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x -25.1x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 12.0% 24.4% 3.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDBXTEAMMSFT
Debt / assets 92.3% 16.2% 5.3%
Debt / equity -1.2x 0.9x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x -1.7x -0.2x
Debt / FCF 2.7x 0.8x 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 177.4% 82.7% 41.7%
Equity / assets -77.4% 17.3% 58.3%
Interest coverage – 0.2x 50.9x
Current ratio 1.1x 0.8x 1.2x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.3x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 0.72 6.44 9.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDBXTEAMMSFT
Dividend yield – – 0.7%
Net buyback yield 18.1% 3.1% 0.5%
Shareholder yield 18.1% 3.1% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 19.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 39.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 10.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDBXTEAMMSFT
Forward P/E 11.8xFY2026 39.7xFY2027 26.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $3.19FY2026 $5.63FY2027 $20.39FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +12.3%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027 +18.0%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +9.7% +24.5% +11.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.70BFY2026 $7.29BFY2027 $402.39BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +7.0%FY2026 +10.9%FY2027 +21.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -11.1% +23.0% +12.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDBXTEAMMSFT
Held by institutions 80.4% 99.7% 73.9%
Institutions holding 451 696 6,227
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.8% +4.9% +3.3%
Institutions buying 222 434 3,432
Institutions selling 175 193 2,425
Buyers to sellers 1.27 2.25 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DBXTEAMMSFT
DBX 1.00 0.50 0.30
TEAM 0.50 1.00 0.42
MSFT 0.30 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DBX, TEAM and MSFT?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Dropbox (DBX) $8.30B, Atlassian (TEAM) $57.06B, Microsoft (MSFT) $3.95T.

Which stock is cheaper, DBX, TEAM and MSFT?

Dropbox (DBX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Dropbox (DBX) 18.7x, Atlassian (TEAM) -1,060x, Microsoft (MSFT) 29.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dropbox (DBX) is cheapest (Dropbox (DBX) 11.8x, Atlassian (TEAM) 39.7x, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Atlassian (TEAM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dropbox (DBX) 0.0%, Atlassian (TEAM) +26.0%, Microsoft (MSFT) +17.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Dropbox (DBX) 17.5%, Atlassian (TEAM) -0.8%, Microsoft (MSFT) 40.3%). On return on invested capital, Dropbox (DBX) leads (Dropbox (DBX) 104.6%, Atlassian (TEAM) 0.0%, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Atlassian (TEAM) returned the most: Dropbox (DBX) +28.5%, Atlassian (TEAM) +37.4%, Microsoft (MSFT) +1.7%. Over five years, Microsoft (MSFT) compounded fastest (Dropbox (DBX) +4.7%/yr, Atlassian (TEAM) -11.6%/yr, Microsoft (MSFT) +10.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Dropbox (DBX) 0.00%, Atlassian (TEAM) 0.00%, Microsoft (MSFT) 0.01%. Dropbox (DBX) and Atlassian (TEAM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Dropbox (DBX) 38.1%, Atlassian (TEAM) 75.2%, Microsoft (MSFT) 32.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DBX, TEAM and MSFT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.