DAN vs WM vs BLBD Stock Comparison

Dana, Waste Management and Blue Bird Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DAN DANA Inc
$27.05 -0.3% 1M +36.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.95B
P/E
2.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.66B
Div. yield
0.02%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
3 wins
WM Waste Management Inc
$241.10 +16.5% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$94.48B
P/E
33.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.67B
Div. yield
0.02%
Solid Waste Industrials
2 wins
BLBD Blue Bird Corp
$58.04 -0.1% 1M +2.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.96B
P/E
7.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.61B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Blue Bird leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Blue Bird 7, Dana 3, Waste Management 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDANWMBLBDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.95B $94.48B $1.96B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.6x 33.1x 7.0x DAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 27.9x 13.0x BLBD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.7% +7.2% +13.5% BLBD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.6% 11.1% 17.5% BLBD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 10.7% 29.3% BLBD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 3.0x -0.1x BLBD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.02% 0.00% DAN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +36.1% +12.3% +2.9% DAN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr +9.2%/yr +25.1%/yr BLBD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.2% 21.3% 42.8% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 57/100 76/100 BLBD

Percentile Scorecard

DANWMBLBD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDANWMBLBD
Valuation 95 #11 of 203 53 #8 of 16 94 #14 of 203
Growth 82 #35 of 187 69 #5 of 14 93 #15 of 187
Profitability 46 #100 of 185 92 #2 of 14 90 #19 of 185
Financial Health 21 #174 of 219 13 #14 of 16 71 #64 of 219
Shareholder Returns 64 #56 of 153 – 32 #105 of 153
Overall 61 57 76
  • DAN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • BLBD ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDANWMBLBDSPY
1 month -0.3%+16.5%-0.1% -0.8%
3 months -0.7%+1.4%-23.7% +3.5%
6 months -29.7%+6.6%-10.0% +7.0%
Year to date +13.8%+9.7%+23.5% +12.2%
1 year +36.1%+12.3%+2.9% +13.0%
3 years +114.3%+49.4%+211.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +29.0%+14.3%+46.1% +23.1%
5 years +21.8%+55.4%+206.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +4.0%+9.2%+25.1% +11.0%
10 years +78.5%+276.9%+294.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year +6.0%+14.2%+14.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureDANWMBLBDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.2%21.3%42.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.1%20.7%45.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.30-0.411.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.820.580.07 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.7%-18.7%-70.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.5%-2.2%-28.8% -1.8%
52-week high $38.93$246.51$81.50 $779.14
52-week low $19.47$196.77$46.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDANWMBLBD
P/E now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 26.0x 33.9xmedian 34.0x 7.1xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.9x 3.8xmedian 3.4x 1.1xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 14.0x 15.9xmedian 15.3x 8.6xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 21.4x 27.0xmedian 18.5x 12.0xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.2x 9.7xmedian 3.0x 2.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.02median 1.26 4.17median 3.42 0.05median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDANWMBLBD
Revenue $7.66B $25.67B $1.61B
Gross profit $725.00M $10.49B $331.66M
Operating income $210.00M $4.51B $189.81M
Net income $1.13B $2.85B $281.81M
Free cash flow $143.00M $3.57B $153.14M
EPS (diluted) $10.18 $7.09 $8.02
Cash & equivalents $331.00M $557.00M $116.82M
Total debt $1.34B $93.65B $86.81M
Shares (diluted) 109.50M 402.40M 35.15M
Enterprise value $1.26B $93.39B $1.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDANWMBLBD
P/E 2.6x 33.9x 7.1x
P/FCF 20.3x 27.0x 12.0x
P/Operating cash flow 6.4x 14.8x 10.2x
P/S 0.4x 3.8x 1.1x
P/B 1.5x 9.7x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 15.3x 3.8x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x 15.9x 8.6x
EV/EBIT 18.7x 26.4x 9.5x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 4.6x 1.1x
EV/FCF 27.4x 33.4x 11.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.6x 18.3x 10.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.02 4.17 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDANWMBLBD
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.7% 7.2% 13.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 8.6% 14.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 79.0% -18.6% 19.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.4% 11.8% 57.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 307.9% 7.3% 33.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.3% 9.1% 598.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 28,400% 4.8% 143.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 83.0% 7.7% 160.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 6,201% 5.3% 125.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 108.3% 8.1% 155.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.3% 15.9% 8.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.6% 14.8% 16.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 180.4% 65.2% 7.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 33.4% 13.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDANWMBLBD
Gross margin 9.5% 40.9% 20.6%
EBITDA margin 7.3% 29.3% 13.1%
Operating margin 2.7% 17.6% 11.8%
Pretax margin 1.0% 14.1% 20.0%
Net margin 14.6% 11.1% 17.5%
FCF margin 1.9% 13.9% 9.5%
Operating cash flow margin 6.0% 25.4% 11.2%
Return on equity 56.6% 28.6% 58.9%
Return on assets 18.6% 6.2% 30.2%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 10.7% 29.3%
Return on capital employed 5.3% 11.2% 30.9%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.6x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 2.3x 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.7% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDANWMBLBD
Debt / assets 22.0% 50.3% 7.4%
Debt / equity 0.7x 2.4x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 3.0x -0.1x
Debt / FCF 9.4x 6.5x 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 67.6% 78.6% 43.9%
Equity / assets 32.4% 21.4% 56.1%
Interest coverage 1.5x – 27.9x
Current ratio 1.5x 0.9x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.29 2.99 4.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDANWMBLBD
Dividend yield 1.7% 1.5% –
Net buyback yield 19.3% 1.0% 0.4%
Shareholder yield 21.0% 2.5% 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 4.5% 50.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.7% 40.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -12.1% 12.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -4.2% 8.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDANWMBLBD
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2026 27.9xFY2026 13.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.90FY2026 $8.65FY2026 $4.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +413.5%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 +2.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +128.4% +9.5% -6.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.05BFY2026 $25.84BFY2026 $1.64BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.3%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 +10.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +34.2% +12.0% +16.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDANWMBLBD
Held by institutions 99.2% 82.3% 94.5%
Institutions holding 342 2,348 303
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +0.8% -2.6%
Institutions buying 168 1,094 169
Institutions selling 126 901 100
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.21 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DANWMBLBD
DAN 1.00 -0.11 0.27
WM -0.11 1.00 -0.06
BLBD 0.27 -0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DAN, WM and BLBD?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Dana (DAN) $2.95B, Waste Management (WM) $94.48B, Blue Bird (BLBD) $1.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, DAN, WM and BLBD?

Dana (DAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Dana (DAN) 2.6x, Waste Management (WM) 33.1x, Blue Bird (BLBD) 7.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Blue Bird (BLBD) is cheapest (Dana (DAN) 14.2x, Waste Management (WM) 27.9x, Blue Bird (BLBD) 13.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Blue Bird (BLBD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dana (DAN) +3.7%, Waste Management (WM) +7.2%, Blue Bird (BLBD) +13.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Blue Bird (BLBD) has the highest net margin (Dana (DAN) 14.6%, Waste Management (WM) 11.1%, Blue Bird (BLBD) 17.5%). On return on invested capital, Blue Bird (BLBD) leads (Dana (DAN) 0.0%, Waste Management (WM) 10.7%, Blue Bird (BLBD) 29.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dana (DAN) returned the most: Dana (DAN) +36.1%, Waste Management (WM) +12.3%, Blue Bird (BLBD) +2.9%. Over five years, Blue Bird (BLBD) compounded fastest (Dana (DAN) +4.0%/yr, Waste Management (WM) +9.2%/yr, Blue Bird (BLBD) +25.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Dana (DAN) has the highest dividend yield: Dana (DAN) 0.02%, Waste Management (WM) 0.02%, Blue Bird (BLBD) 0.00%. Blue Bird (BLBD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Dana (DAN) 44.2%, Waste Management (WM) 21.3%, Blue Bird (BLBD) 42.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DAN, WM and BLBD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Blue Bird (BLBD) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.