CZR vs SGHC vs LVS Stock Comparison

Caesars Entertainment, Super Group (SGHC) and Las Vegas Sands Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Ltd
$11.50 +0.2% 1M -5.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.79B
P/E
13.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.49B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp
$40.75 +11.3% 1M -33.5% 1Y
Market cap
$26.11B
P/E
16.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.60B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Super Group (SGHC) leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Super Group (SGHC) 8, Las Vegas Sands 2, Caesars Entertainment 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCZRSGHCLVSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.94B $5.79B $26.11B LVS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -11.1x 13.9x 16.2x SGHC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.4x 15.7x SGHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.1% +13.6% +10.9% SGHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.5% 16.7% 11.8% SGHC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.4% 37.6% 14.9% SGHC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x -1.0x 2.9x SGHC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +46.7% -5.8% -33.5% CZR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -22.7%/yr +1.3%/yr -0.9%/yr SGHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.7% 41.3% 32.0% LVS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 87/100 82/100 SGHC

Percentile Scorecard

CZRSGHCLVS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCZRSGHCLVS
Valuation 93 #4 of 45 71 #14 of 45 89 #6 of 45
Growth 21 #34 of 43 98 #2 of 43 81 #9 of 43
Profitability 49 #22 of 42 100 #1 of 42 95 #3 of 42
Financial Health 36 #31 of 48 96 #3 of 48 57 #21 of 48
Shareholder Returns 39 #18 of 29 71 #9 of 29 86 #5 of 29
Overall 48 87 82
  • CZR ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • SGHC ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • LVS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCZRSGHCLVSSPY
1 month -1.0%+0.2%+11.3% -1.0%
3 months -2.5%-12.2%-11.1% -0.4%
6 months +5.8%-11.1%-23.4% +4.5%
Year to date +25.5%-3.8%-37.4% +12.4%
1 year +46.7%-5.8%-33.5% +13.6%
3 years -33.9%+200.3%-16.6% +76.4%
3 years, per year -12.9%+44.3%-5.9% +20.8%
5 years -72.4%+6.6%-4.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year -22.7%+1.3%-0.9% +10.4%
10 years +171.9%—-31.0% +267.7%
10 years, per year +10.5%—-3.6% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCZRSGHCLVSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.7%41.3%32.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.7%42.6%35.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.540.750.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.18-0.14-1.05 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.0%-78.5%-52.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.5%-26.2%-41.4% -1.6%
52-week high $30.41$15.58$69.49 $779.14
52-week low $18.14$8.52$35.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCZRSGHCLVS
P/E now vs peer median -11.2xmedian 18.6x 14.0xmedian 18.6x 16.2xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 1.9x 2.3xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 10.9x 9.2xmedian 10.9x 8.7xmedian 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x 10.6xmedian 12.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.5x 6.1xmedian 2.5x -74.3xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.28median 0.60 0.14median 0.60 0.38median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCZRSGHCLVS
Revenue $11.72B $2.49B $13.60B
Gross profit $5.82B – $6.46B
Operating income $1.80B – $2.85B
Net income -$497.00M $418.40M $1.81B
Free cash flow $582.00M – $2.41B
R&D – – $180.00M
EPS (diluted) $-2.61 $0.82 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $864.00M $602.00M $2.86B
Total debt $11.56B $17.00M $15.44B
Shares (diluted) 204.00M 507.84M 640.00M
Enterprise value $2.35B $3.71B $12.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCZRSGHCLVS
P/E -11.2x 14.0x 16.2x
P/FCF 10.3x – 10.6x
P/Operating cash flow 4.8x – 7.3x
P/S 0.5x 2.3x 1.9x
P/B 1.7x 6.1x -74.3x
P/Tangible book -12.2x 9.0x -74.3x
EV/EBITDA 5.2x 9.2x 8.7x
EV/EBIT 9.3x 11.1x 13.4x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 2.1x 2.8x
EV/FCF 28.7x – 15.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.4x – 10.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.28 0.14 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCZRSGHCLVS
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.1% 13.6% 10.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.6% 18.3% 16.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.9% – 5.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.1% – 16.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -18.0% – 5.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -9.4% – 25.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -140.1% 88.9% 0.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -39.0% 100.6% 39.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -124.4% 86.8% 10.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -40.9% 101.9% 42.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -4.7% – 27.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -11.9% – 18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 53.2% – 86.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.7% – 23.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCZRSGHCLVS
Gross margin 49.7% – 47.5%
EBITDA margin 27.4% 22.8% 32.4%
Operating margin 15.4% – 20.9%
Pretax margin -4.1% 19.0% 16.3%
Net margin -4.5% 16.7% 11.8%
FCF margin 5.0% – 17.7%
Operating cash flow margin 10.6% – 25.6%
Return on equity -13.3% 46.9% 656.1%
Return on assets -1.5% 29.9% 9.2%
Return on invested capital 11.4% 37.6% 14.9%
Return on capital employed 6.1% 34.1% 18.9%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.5x – 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 1.2% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCZRSGHCLVS
Debt / assets 36.8% 1.2% 79.5%
Debt / equity 3.4x 0.0x -44.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x -1.0x 2.9x
Debt / FCF 19.9x – 6.4x
Liabilities / assets 89.0% 33.4% 101.8%
Equity / assets 11.0% 66.6% -1.8%
Interest coverage – 236.5x 3.8x
Current ratio 0.8x – 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 83.5x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.4x 60.2x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – – 2.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCZRSGHCLVS
Dividend yield – 3.8% 2.9%
Net buyback yield 3.0% – 10.7%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 3.8% 13.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCZRSGHCLVS
Forward P/E – 14.4xFY2026 15.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.01FY2026 $0.80FY2026 $2.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +86.0%FY2026 -13.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +23.7% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.36BFY2026 $2.52BFY2026 $14.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.1%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.7% +8.9% +3.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCZRSGHCLVS
Held by institutions 96.6% 23.8% 41.0%
Institutions holding 417 197 712
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.0% +21.4% +0.1%
Institutions buying 208 119 333
Institutions selling 152 59 290
Buyers to sellers 1.37 2.02 1.15

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CZRSGHCLVS
CZR 1.00 0.13 0.17
SGHC 0.13 1.00 0.21
LVS 0.17 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CZR, SGHC and LVS?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Caesars Entertainment (CZR) $5.94B, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) $5.79B, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) $26.11B.

Which stock is cheaper, CZR, SGHC and LVS?

Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Caesars Entertainment (CZR) -11.1x, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 13.9x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 16.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) is cheapest (Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 14.4x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 15.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Caesars Entertainment (CZR) +3.1%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) +13.6%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) +10.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) has the highest net margin (Caesars Entertainment (CZR) -4.5%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 16.7%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) leads (Caesars Entertainment (CZR) 11.4%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 37.6%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Caesars Entertainment (CZR) returned the most: Caesars Entertainment (CZR) +46.7%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) -5.8%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -33.5%. Over five years, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) compounded fastest (Caesars Entertainment (CZR) -22.7%/yr, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) +1.3%/yr, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -0.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) has been the steadiest (Caesars Entertainment (CZR) 39.7%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 41.3%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 32.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CZR, SGHC and LVS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.