CYRX vs OZVN vs RBA Stock Comparison

Cryoport, Oz Vision and Rb Global Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CYRX Cryoport, Inc.
$18.64 +7.2% 1M +106.2% 1Y
Market cap
$922.09M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$186.45M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
1 win
OZVN Oz Vision Inc.
$2.50 0.0% 1M +138.1% 1Y
Market cap
$73.43M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$46.93K
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
1 win
RBA Rb Global Inc.
$84.40 +4.5% 1M -18.2% 1Y
Market cap
$16.41B
P/E
37.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.85B
Div. yield
0.02%
Logistics Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Rb Global leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Rb Global 7, Cryoport 1, Oz Vision 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCYRXOZVNRBALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $922.09M $73.43M $16.41B RBA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -20.3x -1,252x 37.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 20.2x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.1% -13.5% +9.7% CYRX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -24.3% -125.0% 9.0% RBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -5.8% — 7.4% RBA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 16.6x — 1.8x RBA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +106.2% +138.1% -18.2% OZVN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.6%/yr -13.0%/yr +4.3%/yr RBA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.2% 74.5% 33.8% RBA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 26/100 43/100 RBA

Percentile Scorecard

CYRXOZVNRBA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCYRXOZVNRBA
Valuation 4 #130 of 136 2 #134 of 136 22 #107 of 136
Growth 51 #60 of 122 39 #75 of 122 74 #33 of 122
Profitability 10 #105 of 116 10 #104 of 116 46 #63 of 116
Financial Health 63 #54 of 143 52 #69 of 143 48 #75 of 143
Shareholder Returns 24 #62 of 81 – 26 #60 of 81
Overall 30 26 43
  • CYRX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • OZVN ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • RBA ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCYRXOZVNRBASPY
1 month +7.2%0.0%+4.5% +0.9%
3 months +24.8%0.0%-26.7% +5.9%
6 months +90.2%0.0%-19.8% +8.5%
Year to date +94.2%+127.3%-18.0% +13.3%
1 year +106.2%+138.1%-18.2% +12.4%
3 years +103.3%+65.6%+35.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +26.7%+18.3%+10.7% +23.5%
5 years -77.1%-50.0%+23.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year -25.6%-13.0%+4.3% +11.0%
10 years +827.4%—+144.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year +25.0%—+9.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCYRXOZVNRBASPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.2%74.5%33.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.5%—40.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.59-0.540.78 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.301.85-0.54 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.4%-90.0%-33.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%0.0%-29.2% -0.9%
52-week high $18.64$2.50$119.14 $779.14
52-week low $7.72$1.05$79.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCYRXOZVNRBA
P/E now vs peer median -20.7xmedian 16.1x -1,252xmedian 16.1x 35.9xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 0.9x 1,565xmedian 0.9x 3.2xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -57.9xmedian 8.6x —median 8.6x 13.9xmedian 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -47.1xmedian 11.6x 16,939xmedian 11.6x 25.6xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.2x 5.9xmedian 1.2x 2.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -9.95median 0.80 19.72median 0.80 0.75median 0.80

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCYRXOZVNRBA
Revenue $186.45M $46.93K $4.85B
Gross profit $87.77M $13.08K $1.18B
Operating income -$39.62M -$58.67K $777.60M
Net income -$37.39M -$58.67K $484.40M
Free cash flow -$20.03M $4.34K $611.20M
R&D $17.75M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.90 $0.00 $2.33
Cash & equivalents $269.27M $4.39K $524.90M
Total debt $186.83M $376.49K $2.90B
Shares (diluted) 50.44M 29.37M 186.90M
Enterprise value -$710.75M $73.41M $14.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCYRXOZVNRBA
P/E -20.7x -1,252x 35.9x
P/FCF -47.1x 16,939x 25.6x
P/Operating cash flow 118.4x 16,939x 18.2x
P/S 5.1x 1,565x 3.2x
P/B 1.9x 5.9x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 2.7x -124.5x 4.9x
EV/EBITDA -57.9x – 13.9x
EV/EBIT -18.5x -1,254x 23.2x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 1,568x 3.7x
EV/FCF -36.7x 16,976x 29.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 92.1x 16,976x 20.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -9.95 19.72 0.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCYRXOZVNRBA
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.1% -13.5% 9.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.2% -56.6% 25.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.1% 2,944% -41.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -5.6% -22.4% -2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 7.8% 10.7% 5.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.7% -101.9% 39.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -147.3% 10.7% 15.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.1% -101.9% 48.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -163.7% 10.7% 15.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.1% -63.5% 48.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 147.7% 127.9% -9.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 37.7% 39.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 40.6% 127.9% -15.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.5% 37.7% 46.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCYRXOZVNRBA
Gross margin 47.1% 27.9% 24.3%
EBITDA margin -6.8% – 26.6%
Operating margin -21.2% -125.0% 16.0%
Pretax margin -16.6% -125.0% 12.5%
Net margin -24.3% -125.0% 9.0%
FCF margin -10.7% 9.2% 12.6%
Operating cash flow margin 4.3% 9.2% 17.8%
Return on equity -7.6% -0.5% 8.6%
Return on assets -4.9% -0.4% 3.9%
Return on invested capital -5.8% – 7.4%
Return on capital employed -7.4% -0.5% 7.1%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x -0.1x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 5.2% – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCYRXOZVNRBA
Debt / assets 24.7% 1.2% 23.3%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.0x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 16.6x – 1.8x
Debt / FCF -9.3x 37.3x 4.8x
Liabilities / assets 35.1% 8.8% 55.4%
Equity / assets 64.9% 91.2% 44.6%
Interest coverage -18.8x – 4.3x
Current ratio 2.1x 0.0x 1.3x
Quick ratio 2.0x 0.0x 1.0x
Cash ratio 1.8x 0.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 1.28 36.19 2.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCYRXOZVNRBA
Dividend yield – – 1.5%
Net buyback yield 0.4% – 0.6%
Shareholder yield 0.4% – 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 55.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 43.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 0.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCYRXOZVNRBA
Forward P/E – – 20.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.77FY2026 – $4.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -155.0%FY2026 – +4.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +22.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $201.00MFY2026 – $5.33BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.1%FY2026 – +16.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.4% – -6.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCYRXOZVNRBA
Held by institutions 89.0% – 96.6%
Institutions holding 184 – 556
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.6% – +2.6%
Institutions buying 102 – 276
Institutions selling 49 – 185
Buyers to sellers 2.08 – 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CYRXOZVNRBA
CYRX 1.00 0.09 0.18
OZVN 0.09 1.00 0.03
RBA 0.18 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CYRX, OZVN and RBA?

Rb Global (RBA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cryoport (CYRX) $922.09M, Oz Vision (OZVN) $73.43M, Rb Global (RBA) $16.41B.

Which company is growing faster?

Cryoport (CYRX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cryoport (CYRX) +12.1%, Oz Vision (OZVN) -13.5%, Rb Global (RBA) +9.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rb Global (RBA) has the highest net margin (Cryoport (CYRX) -24.3%, Oz Vision (OZVN) -125.0%, Rb Global (RBA) 9.0%). On return on invested capital, Rb Global (RBA) leads (Cryoport (CYRX) -5.8%, Rb Global (RBA) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Oz Vision (OZVN) returned the most: Cryoport (CYRX) +106.2%, Oz Vision (OZVN) +138.1%, Rb Global (RBA) -18.2%. Over five years, Rb Global (RBA) compounded fastest (Cryoport (CYRX) -25.6%/yr, Oz Vision (OZVN) -13.0%/yr, Rb Global (RBA) +4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cryoport (CYRX) 0.00%, Rb Global (RBA) 0.02%. Cryoport (CYRX) and Oz Vision (OZVN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rb Global (RBA) has been the steadiest (Cryoport (CYRX) 46.2%, Oz Vision (OZVN) 74.5%, Rb Global (RBA) 33.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CYRX, OZVN and RBA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rb Global (RBA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.