CYPH vs GNLN vs BLSH Stock Comparison

Cypherpunk Technologies, Greenlane Holdings and Bullish Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLSH Bullish
$28.97 -22.9% 1M -48.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.57B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$190.34B
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Bullish leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Bullish 4, Cypherpunk Technologies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCYPHGNLNBLSHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $561.83M $7.66M $3.57B BLSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 9.4x -0.1x -2.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 69.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -67.0% -26.5% BLSH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -4,632.1% -0.7% BLSH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -4.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +538.8% -93.0% -48.6% CYPH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -35.6%/yr -96.2%/yr — CYPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 233.2% 138.7% 73.1% BLSH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 22/100 63/100 CYPH

Percentile Scorecard

CYPHGNLNBLSH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCYPHGNLNBLSH
Valuation 52 #48 of 99 9 #90 of 99 76 #25 of 99
Growth 90 #10 of 94 20 #75 of 94 33 #63 of 94
Profitability 88 #12 of 90 3 #87 of 90 47 #48 of 90
Financial Health 89 #12 of 105 56 #47 of 105 95 #6 of 105
Shareholder Returns 25 #46 of 61 – –
Overall 69 22 63
  • CYPH ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • GNLN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • BLSH ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCYPHGNLNBLSHSPY
1 month -24.0%-39.7%-22.9% -0.2%
3 months +413.1%+3.4%+27.8% +3.9%
6 months +247.8%-50.9%-27.2% +8.2%
Year to date +169.8%-85.3%-23.5% +12.9%
1 year +538.8%-93.0%-48.6% +12.3%
3 years +123.6%-100.0%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +30.8%-96.3%— +23.3%
5 years -88.9%-100.0%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -35.6%-96.2%— +10.9%

Risk

MeasureCYPHGNLNBLSHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 233.2%138.7%73.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 168.6%141.7%70.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 4.862.422.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.31-0.67-0.66 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.3%-100.0%-70.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.0%-93.2%-48.6% -1.2%
52-week high $4.12$27.08$56.31 $779.14
52-week low $0.41$1.68$21.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCYPHGNLNBLSH
P/E now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 20.0x -0.1xmedian 20.0x -2.7xmedian 20.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.3x 2.9xmedian 2.3x 0.0xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x 0.0xmedian 17.5x -34.3xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.9x -0.5xmedian 15.9x 38.4xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 2.0x 0.3xmedian 2.0x 1.8xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.36median 1.03 0.00median 1.03 —median 1.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCYPHGNLNBLSH
Revenue – $2.63M $190.34B
Gross profit – -$12.94M $71.94M
Operating income -$29.84M -$56.54M -$124.59M
Net income $59.65M -$121.56M -$1.43B
Free cash flow – -$15.54M $113.88M
R&D $12.96M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.27 $-29.71 $-10.84
Cash & equivalents $7.62M $6.10M $86.61M
Total debt – – $11.00K
Shares (diluted) 217.34M 4.10M 127.72M
Enterprise value $512.36M -$46.08M -$1.25B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCYPHGNLNBLSH
P/E 9.7x -0.1x -2.7x
P/FCF – -0.5x 38.4x
P/Operating cash flow – -0.5x 35.5x
P/S – 2.9x 0.0x
P/B 4.1x 0.3x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 58.1x 0.8x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – 0.0x -34.3x
EV/EBIT -19.1x 0.0x -32.6x
EV/Revenue – 0.6x 0.0x
EV/FCF – -0.1x 35.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – -0.1x 33.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.36 0.00 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCYPHGNLNBLSH
Revenue growth (1Y) – -67.0% -26.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -69.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -388.7% -17.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -37.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 55.3% -410.8% -57.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.9% 30.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 190.8% -518.4% -858.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.6% 10.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 117.3% 80.8% -755.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.0% 85.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -51.8% 190.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -24.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -49.7% 171.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -16.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCYPHGNLNBLSH
Gross margin – -492.4% 0.0%
EBITDA margin – -2,135% -0.1%
Operating margin – -2,151% -0.1%
Pretax margin – -4,625% -0.8%
Net margin – -4,632% -0.7%
FCF margin – -591.1% 0.1%
Operating cash flow margin – -590.0% 0.1%
Return on equity 40.7% -321.8% -55.4%
Return on assets 39.0% -275.5% -44.5%
Return on invested capital – – -4.8%
Return on capital employed -19.7% -150.5% -4.0%
Asset turnover – 0.1x 59.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.1x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 41.6% 0.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCYPHGNLNBLSH
Debt / assets – – 0.0%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.6x
Debt / FCF – – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 2.6% 20.4% 20.6%
Equity / assets 97.4% 79.6% 79.4%
Interest coverage -1,243x -1,067x -2.2x
Current ratio 79.2x 2.4x 23.5x
Quick ratio 4.4x 0.9x 2.5x
Cash ratio 4.4x 0.9x 2.5x
Altman Z-score – -22.36 65.13

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCYPHGNLNBLSH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -3.3% – –
Shareholder yield -3.3% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCYPHGNLNBLSH
Forward P/E – – 69.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $-904,073.61FY2023 $0.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -100.0%FY2026 – +40.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +95.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2025 $266.10MFY2026 $364.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +6,010.3%FY2026 +26.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +5.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCYPHGNLNBLSH
Held by institutions 8.1% – 32.8%
Institutions holding 47 – 175
Change in shares held, QoQ +103.3% – +7.8%
Institutions buying 30 – 87
Institutions selling 6 – 70
Buyers to sellers 5.00 – 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CYPHGNLNBLSH
CYPH 1.00 0.05 0.26
GNLN 0.05 1.00 0.18
BLSH 0.26 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CYPH, GNLN and BLSH?

Bullish (BLSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cypherpunk Technologies (CYPH) $561.83M, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) $7.66M, Bullish (BLSH) $3.57B.

Which company is growing faster?

Bullish (BLSH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) -67.0%, Bullish (BLSH) -26.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bullish (BLSH) has the highest net margin (Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) -4,632.1%, Bullish (BLSH) -0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cypherpunk Technologies (CYPH) returned the most: Cypherpunk Technologies (CYPH) +538.8%, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) -93.0%, Bullish (BLSH) -48.6%. Over five years, Cypherpunk Technologies (CYPH) compounded fastest (Cypherpunk Technologies (CYPH) -35.6%/yr, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) -96.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bullish (BLSH) has been the steadiest (Cypherpunk Technologies (CYPH) 233.2%, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) 138.7%, Bullish (BLSH) 73.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CYPH, GNLN and BLSH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bullish (BLSH) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.