CWST vs GLGI vs WCN Stock Comparison

Casella Waste Systems, Greystone Logistics and Waste Connections Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WCN Waste Connections, Inc.
$181.92 +16.8% 1M +4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$45.87B
P/E
37.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.94B
Div. yield
0.77%
Solid Waste Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Waste Connections leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Waste Connections 5, Casella Waste Systems 5, Greystone Logistics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWSTGLGIWCNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.87B $6.00M $45.87B WCN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1,045x -0.6x 37.2x WCN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 72.6x — 33.7x WCN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.6% -59.9% +6.3% CWST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.3% -43.8% — CWST
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% -37.9% — CWST
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.4x -4.6x — GLGI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.77% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.5% -78.0% +4.1% CWST
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.4%/yr -24.6%/yr +6.5%/yr WCN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.0% 116.5% 25.8% WCN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 10/100 46/100 CWST

Percentile Scorecard

CWSTGLGIWCN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWSTGLGIWCN
Valuation 40 #10 of 16 29 #145 of 203 27 #12 of 16
Growth 39 #9 of 14 0 #188 of 188 69 #5 of 14
Profitability 62 #6 of 14 6 #173 of 183 69 #5 of 14
Financial Health 47 #9 of 16 7 #203 of 217 20 #13 of 16
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 47 10 46
  • CWST ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • GLGI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WCN ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWSTGLGIWCNSPY
1 month +13.9%-15.4%+16.8% -0.2%
3 months +2.9%-12.0%+7.5% +3.9%
6 months +20.5%+37.5%+11.2% +8.2%
Year to date -4.3%-62.1%+3.7% +12.9%
1 year +5.5%-78.0%+4.1% +12.3%
3 years +27.5%-77.1%+42.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +8.4%-38.8%+12.4% +23.3%
5 years +12.7%-75.6%+37.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +2.4%-24.6%+6.5% +10.9%
10 years +755.8%-12.0%+268.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +24.0%-1.3%+13.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCWSTGLGIWCNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.0%116.5%25.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.0%150.7%23.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.09-1.08-0.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.15-0.670.16 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.7%-90.7%-25.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.7%-76.3%-2.5% -1.2%
52-week high $107.34$0.93$186.62 $779.14
52-week low $74.97$0.15$149.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWSTGLGIWCN
P/E now vs peer median 1,045xmedian 33.2x -0.6xmedian 25.2x 37.2xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 3.3x 0.3xmedian 1.9x 4.6xmedian 3.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 14.5x -7.0xmedian 14.0x —median 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.6xmedian 16.4x -1.2xmedian 21.7x 31.8xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.0x 0.7xmedian 2.3x 5.8xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median -20.53median 2.81 0.01median 1.32 —median 2.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWSTGLGIWCN
Revenue $1.96B $22.12M $9.94B
Gross profit $653.52M -$2.92M –
Operating income $66.07M -$8.43M $1.76B
Net income $5.70M -$9.70M $1.13B
Free cash flow $105.67M -$5.06M –
EPS (diluted) $0.09 $-0.36 –
Cash & equivalents $25.54M $360.53K $95.69M
Total debt $1.36B $46.58M –
Shares (diluted) 63.69M 27.27M 253.86M
Enterprise value $4.99B $3.99M $45.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWSTGLGIWCN
P/E 1,045x -0.6x 37.2x
P/FCF 55.6x -1.2x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow 16.7x -1.8x 18.1x
P/S 3.0x 0.3x 4.6x
P/B 3.7x 0.7x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 4.7x 0.7x 7.8x
EV/EBITDA 18.3x -7.0x –
EV/EBIT 109.1x -2.1x –
EV/Revenue 3.7x 0.8x 4.6x
EV/FCF 68.2x -3.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 20.5x -5.3x 18.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -20.53 0.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWSTGLGIWCN
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.6% -59.9% 6.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.4% -28.0% 8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.6% -133.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.0% -31.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.1% -472.2% 61.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -8.5% -51.5% 10.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -48.4% -1,158% 82.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -47.8% -50.9% 10.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -48.5% -1,653% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.9% -56.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 2.9% -132.8% 4.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.0% -31.4% 6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.1% -169.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.9% -49.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWSTGLGIWCN
Gross margin 33.4% -13.2% –
EBITDA margin 20.1% -11.3% –
Operating margin 3.4% -38.1% –
Pretax margin 0.5% -42.4% –
Net margin 0.3% -43.8% –
FCF margin 5.4% -22.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 18.0% -15.0% 25.4%
Return on equity 0.4% -94.7% 14.3%
Return on assets 0.2% -26.5% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 1.5% -37.9% –
Return on capital employed 2.1% -39.6% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 61.6x 0.3x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWSTGLGIWCN
Debt / assets 38.3% 33.5% –
Debt / equity 0.9x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.4x -4.6x –
Debt / FCF 12.9x -2.4x –
Liabilities / assets 55.6% 75.0% 63.3%
Equity / assets 44.4% 25.0% 36.7%
Interest coverage 1.0x – –
Current ratio 1.0x 0.4x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.2x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 2.34 -1.82 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWSTGLGIWCN
Dividend yield – – 0.8%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWSTGLGIWCN
Forward P/E 72.6xFY2026 – 33.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.29FY2026 – $5.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.6%FY2026 – +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.3% – +18.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.05BFY2026 – $10.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.6%FY2026 – +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.1% – 0.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWSTGLGIWCN
Held by institutions 100.0% – 85.2%
Institutions holding 415 – 829
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% – +1.3%
Institutions buying 231 – 410
Institutions selling 127 – 303
Buyers to sellers 1.82 – 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWSTGLGIWCN
CWST 1.00 0.01 0.54
GLGI 0.01 1.00 0.05
WCN 0.54 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CWST, GLGI and WCN?

Waste Connections (WCN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Casella Waste Systems (CWST) $5.87B, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) $6.00M, Waste Connections (WCN) $45.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, CWST, GLGI and WCN?

Waste Connections (WCN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 1,045x, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -0.6x, Waste Connections (WCN) 37.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Connections (WCN) is cheapest (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 72.6x, Waste Connections (WCN) 33.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Casella Waste Systems (CWST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +13.6%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -59.9%, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Casella Waste Systems (CWST) has the highest net margin (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 0.3%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -43.8%). On return on invested capital, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) leads (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 1.5%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -37.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Casella Waste Systems (CWST) returned the most: Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +5.5%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -78.0%, Waste Connections (WCN) +4.1%. Over five years, Waste Connections (WCN) compounded fastest (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +2.4%/yr, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -24.6%/yr, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Waste Connections (WCN) 0.77%. Casella Waste Systems (CWST) and Greystone Logistics (GLGI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Connections (WCN) has been the steadiest (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 37.0%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) 116.5%, Waste Connections (WCN) 25.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CWST, GLGI and WCN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Connections (WCN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.