CWST vs BBCP vs WCN Stock Comparison

Casella Waste Systems, Concrete Pumping Holdings and Waste Connections Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WCN Waste Connections, Inc.
$181.92 +16.8% 1M +4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$45.87B
P/E
37.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.94B
Div. yield
0.77%
Solid Waste Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Concrete Pumping Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Concrete Pumping Holdings 7, Waste Connections 4, Casella Waste Systems 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWSTBBCPWCNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.87B $490.33M $45.87B WCN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1,045x 33.3x 37.2x BBCP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 72.6x 51.2x 33.7x WCN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.6% +10.2% +6.3% CWST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.3% 3.4% — BBCP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% 5.6% — BBCP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.4x 3.1x — BBCP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.34% 0.77% BBCP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.5% +52.3% +4.1% BBCP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.4%/yr +2.2%/yr +6.5%/yr WCN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.0% 47.1% 25.8% WCN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 61/100 46/100 BBCP

Percentile Scorecard

CWSTBBCPWCN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWSTBBCPWCN
Valuation 40 #10 of 16 90 #6 of 52 27 #12 of 16
Growth 39 #9 of 14 28 #27 of 37 69 #5 of 14
Profitability 62 #6 of 14 72 #11 of 37 69 #5 of 14
Financial Health 47 #9 of 16 38 #36 of 57 20 #13 of 16
Shareholder Returns – 77 #7 of 27 –
Overall 47 61 46
  • CWST ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • BBCP ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • WCN ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWSTBBCPWCNSPY
1 month +13.9%-0.4%+16.8% -0.2%
3 months +2.9%-4.3%+7.5% +3.9%
6 months +20.5%+23.8%+11.2% +8.2%
Year to date -4.3%+45.0%+3.7% +12.9%
1 year +5.5%+52.3%+4.1% +12.3%
3 years +27.5%+45.7%+42.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +8.4%+13.4%+12.4% +23.3%
5 years +12.7%+11.5%+37.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +2.4%+2.2%+6.5% +10.9%
10 years +755.8%—+268.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +24.0%—+13.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCWSTBBCPWCNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.0%47.1%25.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.0%37.6%23.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.090.59-0.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.151.110.16 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.7%-49.7%-25.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.7%-19.3%-2.5% -1.2%
52-week high $107.34$12.05$186.62 $779.14
52-week low $74.97$5.73$149.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWSTBBCPWCN
P/E now vs peer median 1,045xmedian 33.2x 33.3xmedian 26.7x 37.2xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 3.3x 1.1xmedian 0.8x 4.6xmedian 3.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 14.5x 7.1xmedian 13.1x —median 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.6xmedian 16.4x 23.2xmedian 23.0x 31.8xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.0x 1.8xmedian 2.4x 5.8xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median -20.53median 2.81 -1.77median 0.57 —median 2.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWSTBBCPWCN
Revenue $1.96B $436.03M $9.94B
Gross profit $653.52M $170.20M –
Operating income $66.07M $56.93M $1.76B
Net income $5.70M $16.50M $1.13B
Free cash flow $105.67M $21.12M –
EPS (diluted) $0.09 $0.29 –
Cash & equivalents $25.54M $42.98M $95.69M
Total debt $1.36B $418.74M –
Shares (diluted) 63.69M 51.10M 253.86M
Enterprise value $4.99B $323.26M $45.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWSTBBCPWCN
P/E 1,045x 33.3x 37.2x
P/FCF 55.6x 23.2x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow 16.7x 5.9x 18.1x
P/S 3.0x 1.1x 4.6x
P/B 3.7x 1.8x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 4.7x 2.8x 7.8x
EV/EBITDA 18.3x 7.1x –
EV/EBIT 109.1x 15.2x –
EV/Revenue 3.7x 2.0x 4.6x
EV/FCF 68.2x 41.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 20.5x 10.5x 18.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -20.53 -1.77 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWSTBBCPWCN
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.6% 10.2% 6.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.4% -0.1% 8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.6% 10.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.0% -1.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.1% 29.7% 61.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -8.5% -2.0% 10.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -48.4% 57.3% 82.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -47.8% -18.9% 10.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -48.5% 63.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.9% -18.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 2.9% 14.0% 4.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.0% -2.6% 6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.1% -33.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.9% 78.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWSTBBCPWCN
Gross margin 33.4% 39.0% –
EBITDA margin 20.1% 27.9% –
Operating margin 3.4% 13.1% –
Pretax margin 0.5% 5.6% –
Net margin 0.3% 3.4% –
FCF margin 5.4% 4.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 18.0% 18.9% 25.4%
Return on equity 0.4% 6.2% 14.3%
Return on assets 0.2% 1.8% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 1.5% 5.6% –
Return on capital employed 2.1% 6.9% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 61.6x 5.0x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.8% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWSTBBCPWCN
Debt / assets 38.3% 46.1% –
Debt / equity 0.9x 1.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.4x 3.1x –
Debt / FCF 12.9x 19.8x –
Liabilities / assets 55.6% 70.5% 63.3%
Equity / assets 44.4% 29.5% 36.7%
Interest coverage 1.0x 1.7x –
Current ratio 1.0x 1.7x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.4x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.6x –
Altman Z-score 2.34 1.09 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWSTBBCPWCN
Dividend yield – 1.3% 0.8%
Net buyback yield – 2.4% –
Shareholder yield – 3.7% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWSTBBCPWCN
Forward P/E 72.6xFY2026 51.2xFY2026 33.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.29FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $5.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.6%FY2026 +111.1%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.3% +63.2% +18.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.05BFY2026 $411.25MFY2026 $10.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.6%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.1% +6.4% 0.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWSTBBCPWCN
Held by institutions 100.0% 33.9% 85.2%
Institutions holding 415 127 829
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% +5.2% +1.3%
Institutions buying 231 76 410
Institutions selling 127 31 303
Buyers to sellers 1.82 2.45 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWSTBBCPWCN
CWST 1.00 0.06 0.54
BBCP 0.06 1.00 0.00
WCN 0.54 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CWST, BBCP and WCN?

Waste Connections (WCN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Casella Waste Systems (CWST) $5.87B, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) $490.33M, Waste Connections (WCN) $45.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, CWST, BBCP and WCN?

Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 1,045x, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 33.3x, Waste Connections (WCN) 37.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Connections (WCN) is cheapest (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 72.6x, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 51.2x, Waste Connections (WCN) 33.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Casella Waste Systems (CWST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +13.6%, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +10.2%, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) has the highest net margin (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 0.3%, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 3.4%). On return on invested capital, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) leads (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 1.5%, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 5.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) returned the most: Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +5.5%, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +52.3%, Waste Connections (WCN) +4.1%. Over five years, Waste Connections (WCN) compounded fastest (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +2.4%/yr, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +2.2%/yr, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) has the highest dividend yield: Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 1.34%, Waste Connections (WCN) 0.77%. Casella Waste Systems (CWST) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Connections (WCN) has been the steadiest (Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 37.0%, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 47.1%, Waste Connections (WCN) 25.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CWST, BBCP and WCN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.