CWK vs PLD vs RMR Stock Comparison

Cushman & Wakefield, Prologis and Rmr Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CWK Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.
$12.63 +6.4% 1M -25.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.96B
P/E
42.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.82B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Real Estate Services Real Estate
3 wins
PLD Prologis, Inc.
$125.28 -5.4% 1M -0.3% 1Y
Market cap
$119.08B
P/E
27.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.36B
Div. yield
3.37%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
4 wins
RMR Rmr Group Inc.
$17.32 -6.4% 1M +19.9% 1Y
Market cap
$555.63M
P/E
14.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$638.98M
Div. yield
10.39%
Commercial Real Estate Services Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Rmr leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Rmr 5, Prologis 4, Cushman & Wakefield 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWKPLDRMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.96B $119.08B $555.63M PLD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 42.8x 27.8x 14.7x RMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.3x 35.2x 27.1x CWK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +7.2% -15.2% CWK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.6% 45.4% 3.1% PLD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.0% 5.0% 6.1% CWK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.7x 4.3x 1.6x RMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.37% 10.39% RMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.0% -0.3% +19.9% RMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.2%/yr -2.9%/yr -13.0%/yr PLD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.8% 20.5% 27.3% PLD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 50/100 55/100 RMR

Percentile Scorecard

CWKPLDRMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWKPLDRMR
Valuation 65 #7 of 18 9 #132 of 145 77 #5 of 18
Growth 27 #12 of 16 65 #51 of 142 7 #15 of 16
Profitability 40 #10 of 16 77 #32 of 135 60 #7 of 16
Financial Health 19 #14 of 17 87 #19 of 136 75 #5 of 17
Shareholder Returns – 13 #114 of 131 –
Overall 38 50 55
  • CWK ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • PLD ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • RMR ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWKPLDRMRSPY
1 month +6.4%-5.4%-6.4% +0.9%
3 months -6.6%-13.9%-11.6% +5.9%
6 months -9.5%-9.8%-0.2% +8.5%
Year to date -22.0%-1.9%+16.2% +13.3%
1 year -25.0%-0.3%+19.9% +12.4%
3 years +89.1%+28.7%-20.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +23.7%+8.8%-7.4% +23.5%
5 years -31.3%-13.6%-50.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -7.2%-2.9%-13.0% +11.0%
10 years —+145.3%-50.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+9.4%-6.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCWKPLDRMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.8%20.5%27.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.4%20.7%25.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.550.390.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.55-0.020.73 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.8%-48.1%-63.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.6%-16.4%-19.0% -0.9%
52-week high $17.20$149.92$21.37 $779.14
52-week low $11.03$122.40$14.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWKPLDRMR
P/E now vs peer median 42.8xmedian 20.9x 27.8xmedian 25.8x 14.7xmedian 20.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.7x 12.7xmedian 4.0x 0.9xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 9.8x 19.2xmedian 14.2x 9.8xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -361.2xmedian 13.1x -162.6xmedian 23.0x -10.7xmedian 13.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.8x 2.0xmedian 1.3x 1.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.54median 0.54 2.40median 1.91 -0.46median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWKPLDRMR
Revenue $10.82B $9.36B $638.98M
Gross profit $1.96B – –
Operating income $477.30M $5.13B $40.72M
Net income $69.10M $4.53B $43.87M
Free cash flow -$8.20M -$732.42M -$51.85M
EPS (diluted) $0.29 $4.39 $1.18
Cash & equivalents $500.50M $2.27B $58.20M
Total debt $2.66B $36.83B $163.81M
Shares (diluted) 236.30M 968.51M 16.79M
Enterprise value $442.42M $117.47B $480.09M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWKPLDRMR
P/E 42.8x 27.8x 14.7x
P/FCF -361.2x -162.6x -10.7x
P/Operating cash flow 53.3x 21.5x 5.6x
P/S 0.3x 12.7x 0.9x
P/B 1.5x 2.0x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 2.0x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 8.7x 19.2x 9.8x
EV/EBIT 10.7x 29.9x 16.2x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 16.4x 1.0x
EV/FCF -624.3x -209.8x -12.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 92.1x 27.7x 6.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.54 2.40 -0.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWKPLDRMR
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 7.2% -15.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.3% 5.9% -13.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.5% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.2% 23.6% -0.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.3% 11.7% -30.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -66.4% 32.3% 0.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 81.0% 12.3% -31.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -67.0% 31.3% 0.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 79.4% 11.6% -31.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -65.0% 7.0% 81.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.9% -0.2% -7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -106.5% -124.9% -25.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -35.8% 32.0% -34.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWKPLDRMR
Gross margin 18.1% – –
EBITDA margin 5.5% 85.6% 10.5%
Operating margin 4.4% 54.8% 6.4%
Pretax margin 0.9% 52.0% 8.3%
Net margin 0.6% 45.4% 3.1%
FCF margin -0.1% -7.8% -8.1%
Operating cash flow margin 0.5% 59.3% 15.4%
Return on equity 3.5% 7.6% 10.9%
Return on assets 0.9% 4.4% 6.3%
Return on invested capital 7.0% 5.0% 6.1%
Return on capital employed 9.2% – 6.9%
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.1x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.2x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 2.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWKPLDRMR
Debt / assets 35.2% 35.5% 23.0%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.6x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.7x 4.3x 1.6x
Debt / FCF -324.2x -50.3x -3.2x
Liabilities / assets 73.2% 41.9% 44.1%
Equity / assets 26.8% 58.1% 55.9%
Interest coverage 2.2x 4.8x 4.0x
Current ratio 1.1x – 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.9x – 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 0.5x
Altman Z-score 1.83 – 3.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWKPLDRMR
Dividend yield – 3.4% 10.4%
Net buyback yield – – 0.2%
Shareholder yield – 3.4% 10.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 69.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -59.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 1.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWKPLDRMR
Forward P/E 8.3xFY2026 35.2xFY2026 27.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.52FY2026 $3.56FY2026 $0.64FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +334.3%FY2026 0.0%FY2026 -43.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% +2.0% +17.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.53BFY2026 $8.99BFY2026 $671.70MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.0%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 -4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.4% +1.3% +1.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWKPLDRMR
Held by institutions 96.0% 94.5% 80.2%
Institutions holding 310 1,724 165
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% +1.5% +1.6%
Institutions buying 170 968 81
Institutions selling 99 531 32
Buyers to sellers 1.72 1.82 2.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWKPLDRMR
CWK 1.00 0.33 0.34
PLD 0.33 1.00 0.30
RMR 0.34 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CWK, PLD and RMR?

Prologis (PLD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) $2.96B, Prologis (PLD) $119.08B, Rmr (RMR) $555.63M.

Which stock is cheaper, CWK, PLD and RMR?

Rmr (RMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 42.8x, Prologis (PLD) 27.8x, Rmr (RMR) 14.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) is cheapest (Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 8.3x, Prologis (PLD) 35.2x, Rmr (RMR) 27.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) +11.0%, Prologis (PLD) +7.2%, Rmr (RMR) -15.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Prologis (PLD) has the highest net margin (Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 0.6%, Prologis (PLD) 45.4%, Rmr (RMR) 3.1%). On return on invested capital, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) leads (Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 7.0%, Prologis (PLD) 5.0%, Rmr (RMR) 6.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rmr (RMR) returned the most: Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) -25.0%, Prologis (PLD) -0.3%, Rmr (RMR) +19.9%. Over five years, Prologis (PLD) compounded fastest (Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) -7.2%/yr, Prologis (PLD) -2.9%/yr, Rmr (RMR) -13.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rmr (RMR) has the highest dividend yield: Prologis (PLD) 3.37%, Rmr (RMR) 10.39%. Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Prologis (PLD) has been the steadiest (Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 45.8%, Prologis (PLD) 20.5%, Rmr (RMR) 27.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CWK, PLD and RMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rmr (RMR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.