CWGL vs BLNE Stock Comparison

Crimson Wine and Beeline Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.15 -6.1% 1M -21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$83.37M
P/E
118.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
5 wins
BLNE Beeline Holdings, Inc.
$0.67 -24.7% 1M -79.9% 1Y
Market cap
$22.54M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Crimson Wine leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Crimson Wine 5, Beeline Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWGLBLNELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $83.37M $22.54M CWGL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 118.4x -1.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.5% +269.9% BLNE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.0% -231.1% CWGL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.7% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.6x -0.5x BLNE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.0% -79.9% CWGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.9%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.6% 105.2% CWGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 16/100 CWGL

Percentile Scorecard

CWGLBLNE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWGLBLNE
Valuation 65 #14 of 38 11 #34 of 38
Growth 25 #25 of 33 16 #28 of 33
Profitability 50 #16 of 31 10 #28 of 31
Financial Health 76 #10 of 38 43 #22 of 38
Shareholder Returns 14 #20 of 23 0 #23 of 23
Overall 46 16
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • BLNE ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWGLBLNESPY
1 month -6.1%-24.7% -0.8%
3 months +3.8%-33.0% +3.5%
6 months -3.9%-64.4% +7.0%
Year to date -15.3%-61.0% +12.2%
1 year -21.0%-79.9% +13.0%
3 years -24.5%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -9.0%— +23.1%
5 years -52.6%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -13.9%— +11.0%
10 years -55.5%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -7.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCWGLBLNESPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.6%105.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.8%115.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.112.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.69-0.76 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-93.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.0%-81.3% -1.8%
52-week high $5.25$3.59 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$0.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWGLBLNE
P/E now vs peer median 121.4xmedian 26.6x -0.9xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.5x 2.2xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 14.2x -1.8xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 18.3x -1.2xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.6x 0.4xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -25.03median 2.09 -0.01median 2.09

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWGLBLNE
Revenue $72.36M $10.02M
Gross profit $32.85M –
Operating income -$2.29M -$20.55M
Net income $704.00K -$21.63M
Free cash flow -$31.77M -$18.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-0.74
Cash & equivalents $11.84M $1.41M
Total debt $36.85M $10.41M
Shares (diluted) 20.59M 31.41M
Enterprise value $13.03M $14.87M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWGLBLNE
P/E 121.4x -0.9x
P/FCF -2.7x -1.2x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x -1.2x
P/S 1.2x 2.2x
P/B 0.5x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA 20.3x -1.8x
EV/EBIT -48.3x -1.5x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 3.1x
EV/FCF -3.5x -1.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x -1.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -25.03 -0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWGLBLNE
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.5% 269.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -3.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -199.9% -56.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -59.1% -46.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 143.6% -1.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.1% -11.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 143.6% 72.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.8% 84.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 292.2% -101.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.4% -115.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,125% -101.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -71.7% -112.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWGLBLNE
Gross margin 45.4% –
EBITDA margin 7.5% -172.1%
Operating margin -3.2% -205.0%
Pretax margin 1.5% -212.2%
Net margin 1.0% -231.1%
FCF margin -43.9% -179.5%
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% -179.5%
Return on equity 0.4% -42.7%
Return on assets 0.3% -32.5%
Return on invested capital -0.7% –
Return on capital employed -1.0% -37.9%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.4x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 20.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWGLBLNE
Debt / assets 15.6% 16.5%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.6x -0.5x
Debt / FCF -1.2x -0.6x
Liabilities / assets 21.2% 19.8%
Equity / assets 78.8% 80.2%
Interest coverage -1.6x -70.9x
Current ratio 10.5x 1.1x
Quick ratio 2.1x 0.1x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.31 -2.85

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWGLBLNE
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% -16.3%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -16.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWGLBLNE
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.01FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $27.10MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +225.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +143.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWGLBLNE
Held by institutions 17.4% 12.8%
Institutions holding 5 38
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% -9.2%
Institutions buying 2 20
Institutions selling 2 7
Buyers to sellers 1.00 2.86

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWGLBLNE
CWGL 1.00 0.03
BLNE 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CWGL and BLNE?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Crimson Wine (CWGL) $83.37M, Beeline Holdings (BLNE) $22.54M.

Which company is growing faster?

Beeline Holdings (BLNE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%, Beeline Holdings (BLNE) +269.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) has the highest net margin (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%, Beeline Holdings (BLNE) -231.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Crimson Wine (CWGL) returned the most: Crimson Wine (CWGL) -21.0%, Beeline Holdings (BLNE) -79.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crimson Wine (CWGL) has been the steadiest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.6%, Beeline Holdings (BLNE) 105.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CWGL and BLNE move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.03, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CWGL and BLNE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Crimson Wine (CWGL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.