CWGL vs ABEV vs KO Stock Comparison

Crimson Wine, Ambev and Coca Cola Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.01 -9.3% 1M -23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$82.55M
P/E
117.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
ABEV Ambev S.A.
$2.88 -1.0% 1M +29.7% 1Y
Market cap
$45.39B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.68B
Div. yield
1.04%
Brewers Consumer Staples
6 wins
KO Coca Cola Co
$91.18 +3.8% 1M +30.1% 1Y
Market cap
$392.31B
P/E
26.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$51.05B
Div. yield
2.30%
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Coca Cola leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Coca Cola 6, Ambev 6). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWGLABEVKOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $82.55M $45.39B $392.31B KO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 117.3x 14.3x 26.8x ABEV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.2x 28.1x ABEV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.5% +4.1% +7.1% KO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.0% 18.8% — ABEV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.7% 25.3% — ABEV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.6x -0.4x — ABEV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.04% 2.30% KO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.6% +29.7% +30.1% KO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.5%/yr -0.4%/yr +10.2%/yr KO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.7% 35.9% 19.2% KO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 68/100 52/100 ABEV

Percentile Scorecard

CWGLABEVKO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWGLABEVKO
Valuation 65 #14 of 38 87 #6 of 38 19 #31 of 38
Growth 22 #26 of 33 28 #24 of 33 50 #17 of 33
Profitability 50 #16 of 31 100 #1 of 31 73 #9 of 31
Financial Health 75 #10 of 37 81 #8 of 37 61 #15 of 37
Shareholder Returns 14 #20 of 23 46 #13 of 23 55 #11 of 23
Overall 45 68 52
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • ABEV ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • KO ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWGLABEVKOSPY
1 month -9.3%-1.0%+3.8% -0.2%
3 months +0.2%-7.7%+3.2% +3.9%
6 months -7.4%-1.0%+16.4% +8.2%
Year to date -18.2%+16.6%+30.4% +12.9%
1 year -23.6%+29.7%+30.1% +12.3%
3 years -27.1%+18.0%+65.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -10.0%+5.7%+18.2% +23.3%
5 years -54.2%-2.0%+62.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -14.5%-0.4%+10.2% +10.9%
10 years -57.8%-53.2%+116.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year -8.3%-7.3%+8.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCWGLABEVKOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.7%35.9%19.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.0%37.3%17.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.100.46-0.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.770.831.57 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-46.2%-20.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.6%-16.0%-4.4% -1.2%
52-week high $5.25$3.43$95.34 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$2.18$67.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWGLABEVKO
P/E now vs peer median 117.3xmedian 26.1x 14.3xmedian 26.1x 26.8xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.6x 2.7xmedian 1.6x 7.7xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 14.0x 7.5xmedian 14.0x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.6xmedian 18.1x 7.5xmedian 18.1x 25.9xmedian 18.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.6x 2.6xmedian 2.6x 9.9xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -24.18median 2.07 4.15median 2.07 2.45median 2.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWGLABEVKO
Revenue $72.36M $16.68B $51.05B
Gross profit $32.85M $8.66B $31.82B
Operating income -$2.29M $4.53B $15.34B
Net income $704.00K $3.16B $14.78B
Free cash flow -$31.77M $6.02B –
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $0.20 $3.39
Cash & equivalents $11.84M $3.21B $13.45B
Total debt $36.85M $2.67B $73.00M
Shares (diluted) 20.59M 15.68B 4.31B
Enterprise value $12.21M $30.79B $357.47B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWGLABEVKO
P/E 117.3x 14.3x 26.8x
P/FCF -2.6x 7.5x 25.9x
P/Operating cash flow 8.8x 8.6x 24.2x
P/S 1.1x 2.7x 7.7x
P/B 0.4x 2.6x 9.9x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 3.0x 14.5x
EV/EBITDA 19.7x 7.5x –
EV/EBIT -47.0x 9.5x –
EV/Revenue 1.5x 2.6x 7.4x
EV/FCF -3.4x 7.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.4x 8.2x 23.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -24.18 4.15 2.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWGLABEVKO
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.5% 4.1% 7.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.9% 1.4% 4.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.3% 4.9% 8.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 2.7% 6.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -199.9% 13.0% 4.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -59.1% 9.5% 11.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 143.6% 19.2% 13.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.1% 3.6% 11.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 143.6% -14.2% 12.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.8% 3.5% 11.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 292.2% 14.3% 113.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.4% 9.6% 11.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,125% 11.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -71.7% 4.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWGLABEVKO
Gross margin 45.4% 51.9% –
EBITDA margin 7.5% 34.6% –
Operating margin -3.2% 27.1% –
Pretax margin 1.5% 23.1% –
Net margin 1.0% 18.8% –
FCF margin -43.9% 36.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% 31.5% 31.8%
Return on equity 0.4% 18.4% 38.0%
Return on assets 0.3% 11.7% 13.7%
Return on invested capital -0.7% 25.3% –
Return on capital employed -1.0% 23.5% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.4x 1.7x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 0.5% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWGLABEVKO
Debt / assets 15.6% 4.1% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.6x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF -1.2x 0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 21.2% 35.7% –
Equity / assets 78.8% 64.3% 36.6%
Interest coverage -1.6x 5.7x –
Current ratio 10.5x 1.0x 1.4x
Quick ratio 2.1x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.5x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 1.27 4.13 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWGLABEVKO
Dividend yield – 1.0% 2.3%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 1.2% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.2% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWGLABEVKO
Forward P/E – 15.2xFY2026 28.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.19FY2026 $3.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +5.6%FY2026 +8.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +15.8% +11.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $18.71BFY2026 $47.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +8.2%FY2026 -1.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +0.1% +0.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWGLABEVKO
Held by institutions 17.4% 6.7% 75.2%
Institutions holding 5 403 3,642
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +0.9% +1.9%
Institutions buying 2 199 1,807
Institutions selling 2 131 1,359
Buyers to sellers 1.00 1.52 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWGLABEVKO
CWGL 1.00 -0.03 -0.09
ABEV -0.03 1.00 0.21
KO -0.09 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CWGL, ABEV and KO?

Coca Cola (KO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Crimson Wine (CWGL) $82.55M, Ambev (ABEV) $45.39B, Coca Cola (KO) $392.31B.

Which stock is cheaper, CWGL, ABEV and KO?

Ambev (ABEV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 117.3x, Ambev (ABEV) 14.3x, Coca Cola (KO) 26.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ambev (ABEV) is cheapest (Ambev (ABEV) 15.2x, Coca Cola (KO) 28.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Coca Cola (KO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%, Ambev (ABEV) +4.1%, Coca Cola (KO) +7.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ambev (ABEV) has the highest net margin (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%, Ambev (ABEV) 18.8%). On return on invested capital, Ambev (ABEV) leads (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -0.7%, Ambev (ABEV) 25.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Coca Cola (KO) returned the most: Crimson Wine (CWGL) -23.6%, Ambev (ABEV) +29.7%, Coca Cola (KO) +30.1%. Over five years, Coca Cola (KO) compounded fastest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -14.5%/yr, Ambev (ABEV) -0.4%/yr, Coca Cola (KO) +10.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Coca Cola (KO) has the highest dividend yield: Ambev (ABEV) 1.04%, Coca Cola (KO) 2.30%. Crimson Wine (CWGL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Coca Cola (KO) has been the steadiest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.7%, Ambev (ABEV) 35.9%, Coca Cola (KO) 19.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CWGL, ABEV and KO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Coca Cola (KO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.