CVR vs CSTM vs PKOH Stock Comparison

Chicago Rivet & Machine, Constellium Se and Park Ohio Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSTM Constellium Se
$24.00 -2.4% 1M +47.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.09B
P/E
5.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.05B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
7 wins
PKOH Park Ohio Holdings Corp
$45.00 -4.6% 1M +120.0% 1Y
Market cap
$600.55M
P/E
22.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.65B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Constellium Se leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Constellium Se 7, Park Ohio Holdings 3, Chicago Rivet & Machine 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCVRCSTMPKOHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.93M $3.09B $600.55M CSTM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.5x 5.4x 22.7x CSTM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 5.7x 13.2x CSTM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.1% +26.1% +2.7% CSTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -8.9% 5.7% 1.6% CSTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -11.3% 26.9% 6.1% CSTM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.7x 1.1x 5.8x CVR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.7% +47.5% +120.0% PKOH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.5%/yr +5.5%/yr +14.1%/yr PKOH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 44.7% 44.4% PKOH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 75/100 51/100 CSTM

Percentile Scorecard

CVRCSTMPKOH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCVRCSTMPKOH
Valuation 37 #129 of 203 98 #5 of 203 85 #32 of 203
Growth 62 #73 of 188 100 #1 of 188 74 #50 of 188
Profitability 14 #158 of 183 67 #61 of 183 41 #109 of 183
Financial Health 76 #52 of 216 21 #172 of 216 14 #187 of 216
Shareholder Returns 11 #135 of 152 91 #14 of 152 44 #86 of 152
Overall 40 75 51
  • CVR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • CSTM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • PKOH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCVRCSTMPKOHSPY
1 month +8.5%-2.4%-4.6% +0.7%
3 months +3.8%-16.0%+14.1% +3.7%
6 months -4.4%-23.3%+55.4% +7.1%
Year to date -21.6%+27.3%+114.9% +12.8%
1 year +13.7%+47.5%+120.0% +11.9%
3 years -37.9%+50.7%+96.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year -14.7%+14.6%+25.2% +22.8%
5 years -59.5%+30.4%+93.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year -16.5%+5.5%+14.1% +10.9%
10 years -62.8%+357.1%+40.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year -9.4%+16.4%+3.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCVRCSTMPKOHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%44.7%44.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 61.5%41.7%43.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.561.941.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.241.062.70 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.9%-66.3%-62.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.6%-33.6%-14.3% -1.2%
52-week high $14.66$36.15$52.51 $779.14
52-week low $8.71$14.75$18.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCVRCSTMPKOH
P/E now vs peer median -4.3xmedian 25.8x 5.6xmedian 25.8x 23.6xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.9x 0.3xmedian 1.9x 0.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -10.4xmedian 14.6x 3.2xmedian 14.6x 12.0xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -7.4xmedian 22.2x 10.1xmedian 22.2x 31.8xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.2x 2.4xmedian 2.2x 1.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.45 —median 1.45 0.38median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCVRCSTMPKOH
Revenue $27.43M $10.05B $1.65B
Gross profit $3.01M $1.61B $286.50M
Operating income -$2.26M $1.20B $71.50M
Net income -$2.44M $576.00M $26.50M
Free cash flow -$1.42M $319.00M $20.50M
R&D – $53.00M –
EPS (diluted) $-2.53 $4.13 $1.87
Cash & equivalents $770.75K $158.00M $48.30M
Total debt $3.50M $1.82B $652.60M
Shares (diluted) 966.13K 138.99M 14.20M
Enterprise value $5.31M $2.50B $409.95M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCVRCSTMPKOH
P/E -4.3x 5.6x 23.6x
P/FCF -7.4x 10.1x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow -10.6x 5.1x 9.7x
P/S 0.4x 0.3x 0.4x
P/B 0.6x 2.4x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 2.6x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA -10.4x 3.2x 12.0x
EV/EBIT -5.0x 4.1x 17.6x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 0.5x 0.8x
EV/FCF -7.9x 15.3x 61.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -11.3x 7.7x 18.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 – 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCVRCSTMPKOH
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.1% 26.1% 2.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.2% – 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 96.7% 54.0% 4.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 65.8% – 5.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 48.2% 82.1% -7.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -103.9% – 10.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 51.7% 400.9% -4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -104.6% – 66.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.7% 413.6% -6.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -104.6% – 62.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 53.0% 92.2% 476.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.5% – 93.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 42.2% 897.5% 187.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 32.5% – 46.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCVRCSTMPKOH
Gross margin 11.0% 16.1% 17.3%
EBITDA margin -4.0% 15.3% 6.3%
Operating margin -8.3% 11.9% 4.3%
Pretax margin -8.3% 8.1% 1.6%
Net margin -8.9% 5.7% 1.6%
FCF margin -5.2% 3.2% 1.2%
Operating cash flow margin -3.6% 6.3% 4.1%
Return on equity -12.1% 44.4% 6.9%
Return on assets -9.1% 9.7% 1.8%
Return on invested capital -11.3% 26.9% 6.1%
Return on capital employed -11.6% 31.0% 6.6%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.7x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.1x 2.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCVRCSTMPKOH
Debt / assets 6.4% 31.0% 44.4%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.4x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.7x 1.1x 5.8x
Debt / FCF -1.1x 5.7x 31.8x
Liabilities / assets 26.0% 77.1% 73.3%
Equity / assets 74.0% 22.9% 26.7%
Interest coverage – 11.0x 1.4x
Current ratio 3.0x 1.5x 2.4x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.49 3.22 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCVRCSTMPKOH
Dividend yield 0.6% – 1.1%
Net buyback yield – 3.7% –
Shareholder yield 0.6% 3.7% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) -3.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -6.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -52.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -53.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCVRCSTMPKOH
Forward P/E – 5.7xFY2026 13.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.18FY2026 $3.41FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +237.1%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -32.3% +13.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $10.71BFY2026 $1.78BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +26.8%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +1.3% +5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCVRCSTMPKOH
Held by institutions 13.4% 88.6% 55.8%
Institutions holding 9 385 104
Change in shares held, QoQ -10.4% -4.5% +6.4%
Institutions buying 2 255 58
Institutions selling 2 108 27
Buyers to sellers 1.00 2.36 2.15

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CVRCSTMPKOH
CVR 1.00 0.08 0.08
CSTM 0.08 1.00 0.36
PKOH 0.08 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CVR, CSTM and PKOH?

Constellium Se (CSTM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) $10.93M, Constellium Se (CSTM) $3.09B, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) $600.55M.

Which stock is cheaper, CVR, CSTM and PKOH?

Constellium Se (CSTM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) -4.5x, Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.4x, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 22.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Constellium Se (CSTM) is cheapest (Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.7x, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 13.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Constellium Se (CSTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) +7.1%, Constellium Se (CSTM) +26.1%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +2.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Constellium Se (CSTM) has the highest net margin (Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) -8.9%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.7%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 1.6%). On return on invested capital, Constellium Se (CSTM) leads (Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) -11.3%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 26.9%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 6.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) returned the most: Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) +13.7%, Constellium Se (CSTM) +47.5%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +120.0%. Over five years, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) compounded fastest (Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) -16.5%/yr, Constellium Se (CSTM) +5.5%/yr, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +14.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) 0.01%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 0.00%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 0.00%. Constellium Se (CSTM) and Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) has been the steadiest (Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) 57.8%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 44.7%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 44.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CVR, CSTM and PKOH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Constellium Se (CSTM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.