CV vs PHG vs QUCY Stock Comparison

CapsoVision, Koninklijke Philips and Quantum Cyber Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CV CapsoVision, Inc
$6.75 +1.5% 1M +38.9% 1Y
Market cap
$337.72M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.41M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
2 wins
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$26.42 +5.8% 1M -8.5% 1Y
Market cap
$25.44B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
3.75%
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
4 wins
QUCY Quantum Cyber N.V.
$0.91 -33.6% 1M -43.1% 1Y
Market cap
$16.24M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Koninklijke Philips leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Koninklijke Philips 4, CapsoVision 2, Quantum Cyber 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCVPHGQUCYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $337.72M $25.44B $16.24M PHG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -12.3x 13.6x -0.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.6% +6.1% — CV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -190.2% 8.9% — PHG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 11.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x 0.8x QUCY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 3.75% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.9% -8.5% -43.1% CV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -11.1%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.0% 28.7% 199.5% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 80/100 30/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

CVPHGQUCY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCVPHGQUCY
Valuation 5 #216 of 227 98 #6 of 227 8 #210 of 227
Growth 44 #123 of 219 95 #11 of 219 46 #118 of 219
Profitability 23 #159 of 206 95 #11 of 206 8 #189 of 206
Financial Health 76 #58 of 238 31 #165 of 238 83 #42 of 238
Shareholder Returns – 79 #29 of 134 3 #130 of 134
Overall 37 80 30
  • CV ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • PHG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • QUCY ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCVPHGQUCYSPY
1 month +1.5%+5.8%-33.6% -0.2%
3 months +2.0%+3.4%-16.5% +3.9%
6 months -0.4%-2.6%+81.3% +8.2%
Year to date -36.9%-2.4%-18.8% +12.9%
1 year +38.9%-8.5%-43.1% +12.3%
3 years —+42.8%-98.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+12.6%-77.5% +23.3%
5 years —-44.3%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —-11.1%— +10.9%
10 years —-11.3%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-1.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCVPHGQUCYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.0%28.7%199.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.4%28.7%111.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.610.812.91 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.41-0.30-0.22 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.8%-75.6%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.2%-19.7%-74.4% -1.2%
52-week high $14.42$32.91$3.56 $779.14
52-week low $4.59$23.81$0.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCVPHGQUCY
P/E now vs peer median -12.3xmedian 29.6x 13.6xmedian 29.6x -0.7xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 23.4xmedian 2.9x 1.2xmedian 2.9x —median 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -12.3xmedian 17.4x 8.1xmedian 17.4x -0.2xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 22.3x 5.9xmedian 22.3x -1.0xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 2.3x 1.9xmedian 2.3x 0.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.04 0.32median 1.04 -0.06median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCVPHGQUCY
Revenue $14.41M $20.60B –
Gross profit $7.55M $16.03B –
Operating income -$27.71M $2.65B -$16.73M
Net income -$27.42M $1.39B -$24.58M
Free cash flow – $4.34B -$16.66M
R&D $20.51M $2.00B $4.80M
EPS (diluted) $-0.55 $1.91 $-1.38
Cash & equivalents – $2.04B $13.45M
Total debt – $9.51B $3.73M
Shares (diluted) 49.94M 962.50M 17.85M
Enterprise value $337.72M $14.59B -$4.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCVPHGQUCY
P/E -12.3x 13.6x -0.7x
P/FCF – 5.9x -1.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.6x -1.0x
P/S 23.4x 1.2x –
P/B 25.7x 1.9x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 25.7x 2.5x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA -12.3x 8.1x -0.2x
EV/EBIT -12.2x 12.4x -0.2x
EV/Revenue 23.4x 1.6x –
EV/FCF – 7.6x -0.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.4x -0.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.32 -0.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCVPHGQUCY
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.6% 6.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.1% 82.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 6.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -36.1% 121.3% -0.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 52.0% 16.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -34.9% 293.5% -23.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 35.6% 4.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 93.8% 539.4% 69.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 42.2% 12.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 116.7% 7.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 53.6% 4.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 54.2% 7.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 45.6% 6.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCVPHGQUCY
Gross margin 52.4% 77.8% –
EBITDA margin -190.7% 19.8% –
Operating margin -192.3% 12.9% –
Pretax margin -190.1% 11.9% –
Net margin -190.2% 8.9% –
FCF margin – 21.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 12.9% –
Return on equity -207.5% 12.7% -197.0%
Return on assets -149.3% 5.4% -158.2%
Return on invested capital – 11.5% –
Return on capital employed -209.8% 11.8% -133.4%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCVPHGQUCY
Debt / assets – 31.2% 0.7%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x 0.8x
Debt / FCF – 2.2x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 29.1% 57.1% 12.9%
Equity / assets 70.9% 42.9% 87.1%
Interest coverage – 6.2x -147.6x
Current ratio 3.4x 1.3x 5.6x
Quick ratio – 0.7x 4.5x
Cash ratio – 0.2x 4.5x
Altman Z-score 21.31 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCVPHGQUCY
Dividend yield – 3.7% –
Net buyback yield – -0.5% -58.7%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.3% -58.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCVPHGQUCY
Forward P/E – 13.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.58FY2026 $1.98FY2026 $-0.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -10.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.91MFY2026 $21.63BFY2026 $1.98MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.7%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +269.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +46.0% -8.2% +349.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCVPHGQUCY
Held by institutions 10.2% 5.4% –
Institutions holding 50 363 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.6% +0.8% –
Institutions buying 36 266 –
Institutions selling 8 76 –
Buyers to sellers 4.50 3.50 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CVPHGQUCY
CV 1.00 -0.01 -0.04
PHG -0.01 1.00 -0.07
QUCY -0.04 -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CV, PHG and QUCY?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is the largest by market capitalisation: CapsoVision (CV) $337.72M, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $25.44B, Quantum Cyber (QUCY) $16.24M.

Which company is growing faster?

CapsoVision (CV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CapsoVision (CV) +14.6%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest net margin (CapsoVision (CV) -190.2%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CapsoVision (CV) returned the most: CapsoVision (CV) +38.9%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -8.5%, Quantum Cyber (QUCY) -43.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: CapsoVision (CV) 0.00%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 3.75%. CapsoVision (CV) and Quantum Cyber (QUCY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (CapsoVision (CV) 96.0%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.7%, Quantum Cyber (QUCY) 199.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CV, PHG and QUCY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.