CUBE vs UMH vs SMA Stock Comparison

CubeSmart, Umh Properties and SmartStop Self Storage REIT Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CUBE CubeSmart
$40.61 +7.3% 1M -2.6% 1Y
Market cap
$9.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.14B
Div. yield
5.22%
Self-Storage REITs Real Estate
4 wins
UMH Umh Properties, Inc.
$15.35 -0.3% 1M +5.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.31B
P/E
95.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$271.36M
Div. yield
5.96%
Residential REITs Real Estate
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

CubeSmart leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (CubeSmart 4, SmartStop Self Storage REIT 4, Umh Properties 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCUBEUMHSMALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.16B $1.31B $1.95B CUBE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2,816x 95.2x 67.7x SMA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.9x 95.9x 56.0x CUBE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.9% +8.4% +21.1% SMA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% 5.1% 9.4% SMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 2.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x — 7.2x CUBE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.22% 5.96% 4.59% UMH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -2.6% +5.1% -5.9% UMH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.9%/yr -8.7%/yr — CUBE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 22.1% 20.0% 27.1% UMH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 48/100 55/100 SMA

Percentile Scorecard

CUBEUMHSMA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCUBEUMHSMA
Valuation 31 #101 of 145 13 #126 of 145 19 #118 of 145
Growth 16 #119 of 141 79 #30 of 141 92 #12 of 141
Profitability 76 #33 of 134 47 #71 of 134 41 #80 of 134
Financial Health 85 #22 of 138 44 #78 of 138 53 #66 of 138
Shareholder Returns 62 #51 of 131 57 #57 of 131 69 #41 of 131
Overall 54 48 55
  • CUBE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • UMH ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SMA ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCUBEUMHSMASPY
1 month +7.3%-0.3%+11.2% -0.2%
3 months -4.5%-2.2%-0.2% +3.9%
6 months +2.6%-1.7%+10.1% +8.2%
Year to date +12.6%-3.5%+14.1% +12.9%
1 year -2.6%+5.1%-5.9% +12.3%
3 years +19.5%+13.5%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +6.1%+4.3%— +23.3%
5 years -26.0%-36.7%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -5.9%-8.7%— +10.9%
10 years +64.9%+27.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +5.1%+2.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCUBEUMHSMASPY
Volatility, 1Y 22.1%20.0%27.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.8%20.2%26.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.290.070.51 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.120.25-0.22 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.6%-50.9%-24.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.5%-7.9%-5.9% -1.2%
52-week high $42.51$16.67$37.51 $779.14
52-week low $35.36$14.14$29.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCUBEUMHSMA
P/E now vs peer median -2,816xmedian 26.3x 95.2xmedian 26.3x 67.7xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 4.0x 4.8xmedian 4.0x 6.4xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x 20.4xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.0xmedian 23.3x -13.6xmedian 23.3x -67.3xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.3x 1.5xmedian 1.3x 1.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 27.74median 1.91 2.64median 1.91 0.88median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCUBEUMHSMA
Revenue $1.14B $271.36M $306.46M
Gross profit $770.66M – $183.40M
Operating income $87.22M – $65.70M
Net income $332.35M $4.77M $30.62M
Free cash flow $482.23M -$96.00M -$29.06M
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $0.16 $0.52
Cash & equivalents $14.31M $28.62M $44.19M
Total debt $450.84M $1.16B $1.12B
Shares (diluted) 227.19M 85.58M 55.45M
Enterprise value $9.06B $1.14B $1.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHSMA
P/E -2,816x 95.2x 67.7x
P/FCF 19.0x -13.6x -67.3x
P/Operating cash flow 15.3x 14.0x 17.7x
P/S 8.1x 4.8x 6.4x
P/B 3.5x 1.5x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 1.5x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 28.0x – 20.4x
EV/EBIT 110.0x – 46.1x
EV/Revenue 8.4x 9.0x 9.9x
EV/FCF 19.9x -25.4x -104.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.0x 26.1x 27.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 27.74 2.64 0.88

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHSMA
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.9% 8.4% 21.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 9.2% 10.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% – 14.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – 5.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -39.8% – 4.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.5% – 0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -11.1% -84.3% 214.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.3% 50.0% 42.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -18.9% 30.0% 206.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -101.5% 36.0% 76.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.6% 15.2% 116.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 32.3% 6.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% -89.5% 90.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.1% 17.3% -32.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHSMA
Gross margin 67.8% – 59.8%
EBITDA margin 30.2% – 48.4%
Operating margin 7.7% – 21.4%
Pretax margin 29.3% – 5.7%
Net margin -0.3% 5.1% 9.4%
FCF margin 42.4% -35.4% -9.5%
Operating cash flow margin 52.6% 34.5% 36.0%
Return on equity 12.6% 3.8% 2.4%
Return on assets 5.0% 2.0% 1.3%
Return on invested capital – – 2.5%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 19.6x 3.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 2.5% 4.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHSMA
Debt / assets 6.8% 67.8% 45.9%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.3x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x – 7.2x
Debt / FCF 0.9x -12.1x -38.5x
Liabilities / assets 60.5% 47.9% 48.4%
Equity / assets 39.5% 52.1% 51.6%
Interest coverage – – 1.3x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHSMA
Dividend yield 5.2% 6.0% 4.6%
Net buyback yield 0.8% -0.9% –
Shareholder yield 6.0% 5.1% 4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 144.4% 1,523% 289.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) 99.5% -75.6% -304.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.2% 9.7% 76.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 18.0% 18.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCUBEUMHSMA
Forward P/E 24.9xFY2026 95.9xFY2026 56.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.63FY2026 $0.16FY2026 $0.63FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.6%FY2026 +128.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -9.2% +12.5% -3.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.19BFY2026 $260.25MFY2026 $266.15MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026 +11.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.2% -1.9% -3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCUBEUMHSMA
Held by institutions 100.0% 75.8% 92.8%
Institutions holding 516 258 262
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% -3.4% +1.3%
Institutions buying 287 131 142
Institutions selling 156 79 87
Buyers to sellers 1.84 1.66 1.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CUBEUMHSMA
CUBE 1.00 0.48 0.73
UMH 0.48 1.00 0.48
SMA 0.73 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CUBE, UMH and SMA?

CubeSmart (CUBE) is the largest by market capitalisation: CubeSmart (CUBE) $9.16B, Umh Properties (UMH) $1.31B, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) $1.95B.

Which stock is cheaper, CUBE, UMH and SMA?

SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CubeSmart (CUBE) -2,816x, Umh Properties (UMH) 95.2x, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 67.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, CubeSmart (CUBE) is cheapest (CubeSmart (CUBE) 24.9x, Umh Properties (UMH) 95.9x, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 56.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CubeSmart (CUBE) +3.9%, Umh Properties (UMH) +8.4%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) +21.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) has the highest net margin (CubeSmart (CUBE) -0.3%, Umh Properties (UMH) 5.1%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 9.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Umh Properties (UMH) returned the most: CubeSmart (CUBE) -2.6%, Umh Properties (UMH) +5.1%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) -5.9%. Over five years, CubeSmart (CUBE) compounded fastest (CubeSmart (CUBE) -5.9%/yr, Umh Properties (UMH) -8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Umh Properties (UMH) has the highest dividend yield: CubeSmart (CUBE) 5.22%, Umh Properties (UMH) 5.96%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 4.59%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Umh Properties (UMH) has been the steadiest (CubeSmart (CUBE) 22.1%, Umh Properties (UMH) 20.0%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 27.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CUBE, UMH and SMA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CubeSmart (CUBE) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.