CUBE vs UMH vs EXR Stock Comparison

CubeSmart, Umh Properties and Extra Space Storage Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CUBE CubeSmart
$40.13 +6.1% 1M -4.6% 1Y
Market cap
$9.18B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.14B
Div. yield
0.05%
Self-Storage REITs Real Estate
2 wins
UMH Umh Properties, Inc.
$15.47 +0.5% 1M +5.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.31B
P/E
95.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$271.36M
Div. yield
0.06%
Residential REITs Real Estate
4 wins
EXR Extra Space Storage Inc.
$143.44 +7.6% 1M -4.5% 1Y
Market cap
$30.42B
P/E
31.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.45B
Div. yield
0.05%
Self-Storage REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Extra Space Storage leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Extra Space Storage 5, Umh Properties 4, CubeSmart 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCUBEUMHEXRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.18B $1.31B $30.42B EXR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2,808x 95.2x 31.8x EXR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.6x 96.7x 29.8x CUBE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.9% +8.4% +4.2% UMH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% 5.1% 27.8% EXR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 4.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x — 5.9x CUBE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.05% 0.06% 0.05% UMH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.6% +5.4% -4.5% UMH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.4%/yr -8.3%/yr -4.8%/yr EXR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 22.1% 20.0% 23.1% UMH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 48/100 55/100 EXR

Percentile Scorecard

CUBEUMHEXR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCUBEUMHEXR
Valuation 30 #102 of 145 15 #123 of 145 24 #111 of 145
Growth 16 #120 of 142 79 #31 of 142 63 #53 of 142
Profitability 75 #35 of 136 45 #75 of 136 82 #25 of 136
Financial Health 85 #22 of 139 44 #78 of 139 54 #65 of 139
Shareholder Returns 64 #48 of 131 59 #55 of 131 53 #62 of 131
Overall 54 48 55
  • CUBE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • UMH ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • EXR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCUBEUMHEXRSPY
1 month +6.1%+0.5%+7.6% -0.8%
3 months -5.1%-0.4%-3.3% +3.5%
6 months +2.8%-0.2%+2.8% +7.0%
Year to date +11.3%-2.8%+10.2% +12.2%
1 year -4.6%+5.4%-4.5% +13.0%
3 years +18.1%+14.3%+37.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +5.7%+4.6%+11.2% +23.1%
5 years -24.1%-35.2%-22.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -5.4%-8.3%-4.8% +11.0%
10 years +53.8%+27.4%+88.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year +4.4%+2.5%+6.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCUBEUMHEXRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 22.1%20.0%23.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.8%20.3%23.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.290.080.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.210.27-0.20 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.6%-50.9%-54.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.6%-7.2%-6.1% -1.8%
52-week high $42.51$16.67$152.75 $779.14
52-week low $35.36$14.14$126.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCUBEUMHEXR
P/E now vs peer median -2,783xmedian 27.4x 95.9xmedian 27.4x 31.6xmedian 27.4x
P/S now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 4.2x 4.9xmedian 4.2x 8.8xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.7xmedian 14.2x —median 14.2x 19.8xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.8xmedian 23.2x -13.7xmedian 23.2x 28.5xmedian 23.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.3x 1.5xmedian 1.3x 2.1xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 27.42median 2.11 2.66median 2.11 -3.57median 2.11

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCUBEUMHEXR
Revenue $1.14B $271.36M $3.45B
Gross profit $770.66M – $2.51B
Operating income $87.22M – $1.41B
Net income $332.35M $4.77M $1.00B
Free cash flow $482.23M -$96.00M $1.06B
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $0.16 $4.35
Cash & equivalents $14.31M $28.62M $695.17M
Total debt $450.84M $1.16B $52.95B
Shares (diluted) 227.19M 85.58M 220.36M
Enterprise value $9.05B $1.14B $29.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHEXR
P/E -2,783x 95.9x 31.6x
P/FCF 18.8x -13.7x 28.5x
P/Operating cash flow 15.1x 14.1x 15.9x
P/S 8.0x 4.9x 8.8x
P/B 3.5x 1.5x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 1.5x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 27.7x – 19.8x
EV/EBIT 108.8x – 30.7x
EV/Revenue 8.3x 9.0x 12.6x
EV/FCF 19.7x -25.6x 40.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.9x 26.2x 22.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 27.42 2.66 -3.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHEXR
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.9% 8.4% 4.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 9.2% 19.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% – 3.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – 17.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -39.8% – -2.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.5% – 9.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -11.1% -84.3% -2.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.3% 50.0% 4.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -18.9% 30.0% -5.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -101.5% 36.0% -8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.6% 15.2% 0.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 32.3% 15.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% -89.5% 35.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.1% 17.3% 89.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHEXR
Gross margin 67.8% – 72.8%
EBITDA margin 30.2% – 63.5%
Operating margin 7.7% – 40.9%
Pretax margin 29.3% – 26.9%
Net margin -0.3% 5.1% 27.8%
FCF margin 42.4% -35.4% 30.9%
Operating cash flow margin 52.6% 34.5% 55.2%
Return on equity 12.6% 3.8% 7.1%
Return on assets 5.0% 2.0% 3.4%
Return on invested capital – – 4.9%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 19.6x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 2.5% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHEXR
Debt / assets 6.8% 67.8% 46.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.3x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x – 5.9x
Debt / FCF 0.9x -12.1x 12.8x
Liabilities / assets 60.5% 47.9% 52.2%
Equity / assets 39.5% 52.1% 47.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCUBEUMHEXR
Dividend yield 5.3% 5.9% 4.5%
Net buyback yield 0.8% -0.9% 0.5%
Shareholder yield 6.0% 5.0% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 144.4% 1,523% 136.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) 99.5% -75.6% 128.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.2% 9.7% -0.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 18.0% 17.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCUBEUMHEXR
Forward P/E 24.6xFY2026 96.7xFY2026 29.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.63FY2026 $0.16FY2026 $4.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.6%FY2026 +128.6%FY2026 +5.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -9.2% +12.5% -2.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.19BFY2026 $260.25MFY2026 $3.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026 +0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.2% -1.9% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCUBEUMHEXR
Held by institutions 100.0% 75.8% 97.5%
Institutions holding 516 258 795
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% -3.4% +2.2%
Institutions buying 287 131 386
Institutions selling 156 79 266
Buyers to sellers 1.84 1.66 1.45

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CUBEUMHEXR
CUBE 1.00 0.48 0.89
UMH 0.48 1.00 0.50
EXR 0.89 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CUBE, UMH and EXR?

Extra Space Storage (EXR) is the largest by market capitalisation: CubeSmart (CUBE) $9.18B, Umh Properties (UMH) $1.31B, Extra Space Storage (EXR) $30.42B.

Which stock is cheaper, CUBE, UMH and EXR?

Extra Space Storage (EXR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CubeSmart (CUBE) -2,808x, Umh Properties (UMH) 95.2x, Extra Space Storage (EXR) 31.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, CubeSmart (CUBE) is cheapest (CubeSmart (CUBE) 24.6x, Umh Properties (UMH) 96.7x, Extra Space Storage (EXR) 29.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Umh Properties (UMH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CubeSmart (CUBE) +3.9%, Umh Properties (UMH) +8.4%, Extra Space Storage (EXR) +4.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Extra Space Storage (EXR) has the highest net margin (CubeSmart (CUBE) -0.3%, Umh Properties (UMH) 5.1%, Extra Space Storage (EXR) 27.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Umh Properties (UMH) returned the most: CubeSmart (CUBE) -4.6%, Umh Properties (UMH) +5.4%, Extra Space Storage (EXR) -4.5%. Over five years, Extra Space Storage (EXR) compounded fastest (CubeSmart (CUBE) -5.4%/yr, Umh Properties (UMH) -8.3%/yr, Extra Space Storage (EXR) -4.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Umh Properties (UMH) has the highest dividend yield: CubeSmart (CUBE) 0.05%, Umh Properties (UMH) 0.06%, Extra Space Storage (EXR) 0.05%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Umh Properties (UMH) has been the steadiest (CubeSmart (CUBE) 22.1%, Umh Properties (UMH) 20.0%, Extra Space Storage (EXR) 23.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CUBE, UMH and EXR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Extra Space Storage (EXR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.