CTVA vs GRO vs MOS Stock Comparison

Corteva, Brazil Potash and Mosaic Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CTVA Corteva, Inc.
$11.31 -85.4% 1M -82.2% 1Y
Market cap
$7.55B
P/E
7.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.81B
Div. yield
6.37%
Crop Protection and Seeds Basic Materials
7 wins
GRO Brazil Potash Corp.
$1.80 -19.3% 1M -34.5% 1Y
Market cap
$96.65M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
1 win
MOS Mosaic Co
$18.31 -17.7% 1M -37.7% 1Y
Market cap
$5.82B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$12.25B
Div. yield
4.81%
Fertilizers Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Corteva leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Corteva 7, Mosaic 3, Brazil Potash 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTVAGROMOSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.55B $96.65M $5.82B CTVA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.5x -0.9x -9.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.8x — 53.9x CTVA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.7% — +8.8% MOS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.7% — -5.2% CTVA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.4% — -1.0% CTVA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x — 5.6x CTVA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 6.37% — 4.81% CTVA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -82.2% -34.5% -37.7% GRO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.5%/yr — -15.1%/yr MOS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 185.8% 78.8% 45.1% MOS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 33/100 42/100 CTVA

Percentile Scorecard

CTVAGROMOS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTVAGROMOS
Valuation 97 #4 of 94 13 #82 of 94 54 #44 of 94
Growth 63 #34 of 91 52 #44 of 91 7 #85 of 91
Profitability 69 #27 of 84 7 #78 of 84 36 #54 of 84
Financial Health 67 #32 of 94 94 #7 of 94 31 #65 of 94
Shareholder Returns 99 #2 of 69 0 #69 of 69 82 #13 of 69
Overall 79 33 42
  • CTVA ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • GRO ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • MOS ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTVAGROMOSSPY
1 month -85.4%-19.3%-17.7% +0.9%
3 months -87.5%-11.8%-19.1% +5.9%
6 months -85.8%-41.7%-20.5% +8.5%
Year to date -83.1%-4.8%-24.0% +13.3%
1 year -82.2%-34.5%-37.7% +12.4%
3 years -76.3%—-44.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year -38.2%—-17.9% +23.5%
5 years -73.8%—-56.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -23.5%—-15.1% +11.0%
10 years ——-23.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——-2.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCTVAGROMOSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 185.8%78.8%45.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 274.1%79.0%44.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.111.560.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.44-0.44-0.84 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.5%-90.5%-77.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -87.5%-53.7%-41.6% -0.9%
52-week high $90.53$3.89$31.36 $779.14
52-week low $11.31$1.69$17.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTVAGROMOS
P/E now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 22.0x -0.9xmedian 22.0x -9.1xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 0.5xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 12.4x —median 12.4x 11.4xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 15.5x -3.9xmedian 15.5x -6.1xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.7x 0.4xmedian 1.7x 0.5xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.44median 1.84 —median 1.84 0.28median 1.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTVAGROMOS
Revenue $17.81B – $12.25B
Gross profit $8.82B – $1.35B
Operating income $3.52B -$95.57M -$169.80M
Net income $1.02B -$28.15M -$624.70M
Free cash flow $680.00M -$24.85M -$947.10M
R&D $1.49B – –
EPS (diluted) $1.51 $-2.04 $-2.01
Cash & equivalents $2.37B $75.71M $294.00M
Total debt $4.88B – $21.00B
Shares (diluted) 669.80M 42.49M 317.90M
Enterprise value -$3.66B -$38.66M $4.99B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTVAGROMOS
P/E 7.5x -0.9x -9.1x
P/FCF 11.1x -3.9x -6.1x
P/Operating cash flow 6.0x -7.7x 13.1x
P/S 0.4x – 0.5x
P/B 0.3x 0.4x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 0.4x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA 2.1x – 11.4x
EV/EBIT 2.9x -0.2x -67.0x
EV/Revenue 0.6x – 0.9x
EV/FCF 14.8x -0.8x -12.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.0x -1.7x 25.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.44 – 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTVAGROMOS
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.7% – 8.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.5% – -10.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.5% – -22.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.8% – -28.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.0% -3.3% -121.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.0% – -27.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -27.7% 57.9% -164.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.0% – -31.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -26.5% 27.7% -168.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.2% – -32.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -61.7% 20.5% -62.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 233.6% – -47.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -75.2% -1.1% -22,126%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 49.7% – -36.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTVAGROMOS
Gross margin 49.5% – 11.0%
EBITDA margin 26.7% – 8.1%
Operating margin 19.8% – -1.4%
Pretax margin 8.9% – -2.0%
Net margin 5.7% – -5.2%
FCF margin 3.8% – -7.7%
Operating cash flow margin 7.1% – 3.6%
Return on equity 4.1% -47.7% -5.2%
Return on assets 2.4% -43.5% -2.5%
Return on invested capital 8.4% – -1.0%
Return on capital employed 11.2% -48.5% -0.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.4x -0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTVAGROMOS
Debt / assets 11.7% – 23.8%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x – 5.6x
Debt / FCF 7.2x – -6.2x
Liabilities / assets 39.0% 5.4% 52.8%
Equity / assets 61.0% 94.6% 47.2%
Interest coverage 20.1x -94.7x –
Current ratio 1.5x 42.2x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.2x 41.9x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.2x 41.8x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.19 – 1.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTVAGROMOS
Dividend yield 6.4% – 4.8%
Net buyback yield 13.3% -65.4% –
Shareholder yield 19.6% -65.4% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -44.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -29.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -4.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTVAGROMOS
Forward P/E 19.8xFY2026 – 53.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.57FY2026 $-0.49FY2026 $0.34FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.0%FY2026 – -85.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.8% – +297.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.64BFY2026 $0.00FY2026 $11.74BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.3%FY2026 – -2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -52.9% – +15.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTVAGROMOS
Held by institutions 88.8% – 95.2%
Institutions holding 1,480 – 662
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% – +7.4%
Institutions buying 646 – 374
Institutions selling 527 – 212
Buyers to sellers 1.23 – 1.76

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTVAGROMOS
CTVA 1.00 0.07 0.06
GRO 0.07 1.00 0.38
MOS 0.06 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTVA, GRO and MOS?

Corteva (CTVA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Corteva (CTVA) $7.55B, Brazil Potash (GRO) $96.65M, Mosaic (MOS) $5.82B.

Which company is growing faster?

Mosaic (MOS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Corteva (CTVA) +3.7%, Mosaic (MOS) +8.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Corteva (CTVA) has the highest net margin (Corteva (CTVA) 5.7%, Mosaic (MOS) -5.2%). On return on invested capital, Corteva (CTVA) leads (Corteva (CTVA) 8.4%, Mosaic (MOS) -1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brazil Potash (GRO) returned the most: Corteva (CTVA) -82.2%, Brazil Potash (GRO) -34.5%, Mosaic (MOS) -37.7%. Over five years, Mosaic (MOS) compounded fastest (Corteva (CTVA) -23.5%/yr, Mosaic (MOS) -15.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Corteva (CTVA) has the highest dividend yield: Corteva (CTVA) 6.37%, Mosaic (MOS) 4.81%. Brazil Potash (GRO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mosaic (MOS) has been the steadiest (Corteva (CTVA) 185.8%, Brazil Potash (GRO) 78.8%, Mosaic (MOS) 45.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTVA, GRO and MOS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Corteva (CTVA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.