CTAS vs MRSH vs UNF Stock Comparison

Cintas, Marsh & Mclennan Companies and Unifirst Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CTAS Cintas Corp
$212.81 +6.1% 1M +12.1% 1Y
Market cap
$86.60B
P/E
42.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
7 wins
UNF Unifirst Corp
$251.11 -3.2% 1M +57.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.62B
P/E
44.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 7, Marsh & Mclennan Companies 4, Unifirst 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTASMRSHUNFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $86.60B $92.72B $4.62B MRSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 42.0x 22.9x 44.0x MRSH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 36.4x 18.8x 31.9x MRSH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +7.6% — CTAS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.8% 14.2% — CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.2% 13.1% — CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.7x — CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.02% 0.00% MRSH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.1% +5.2% +57.4% UNF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.5%/yr +2.9%/yr +4.9%/yr CTAS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.8% 25.8% 34.6% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 34/100 42/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

CTASMRSHUNF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTASMRSHUNF
Valuation 21 #90 of 113 10 #107 of 119 43 #65 of 113
Growth 71 #29 of 96 17 #94 of 113 20 #77 of 96
Profitability 98 #3 of 92 72 #31 of 107 –
Financial Health 69 #39 of 125 16 #90 of 107 91 #12 of 125
Shareholder Returns 41 #40 of 67 54 #49 of 105 12 #59 of 67
Overall 60 34 42
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • MRSH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • UNF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTASMRSHUNFSPY
1 month +6.1%+13.8%-3.2% +0.9%
3 months -1.7%-2.6%-16.7% +5.9%
6 months +22.3%+12.6%-1.8% +8.5%
Year to date +13.2%+3.7%+30.2% +13.3%
1 year +12.1%+5.2%+57.4% +12.4%
3 years +71.5%+4.1%+56.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +19.7%+1.3%+16.1% +23.5%
5 years +96.5%+15.3%+26.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +14.5%+2.9%+4.9% +11.0%
10 years +703.6%+203.2%+106.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year +23.2%+11.7%+7.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCTASMRSHUNFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.8%25.8%34.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.3%24.7%25.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.11-0.380.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.510.201.66 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-35.6%-34.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.8%-3.5%-16.7% -0.9%
52-week high $225.93$199.34$301.48 $779.14
52-week low $163.55$157.32$150.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTASMRSHUNF
P/E now vs peer median 41.3xmedian 21.5x 22.7xmedian 10.9x 44.0xmedian 21.5x
P/S now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 0.9x 3.2xmedian 1.4x 2.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.1xmedian 11.9x 15.7xmedian 7.5x —median 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 41.8xmedian 13.9x 22.0xmedian 8.5x 57.8xmedian 13.9x
P/B now vs peer median 16.3xmedian 2.3x 6.1xmedian 1.5x 2.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.72median 0.92 3.39median 0.59 —median 0.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTASMRSHUNF
Revenue $11.56B $28.46B –
Gross profit $5.89B – –
Operating income $2.70B $6.09B –
Net income $2.06B $4.12B $109.49M
Free cash flow $2.03B $4.15B –
EPS (diluted) $5.10 $8.44 –
Cash & equivalents $243.60M $1.84B $192.12M
Total debt $2.43B $20.53B –
Shares (diluted) 404.29M 479.00M 18.22M
Enterprise value $85.68B $84.88B $4.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHUNF
P/E 41.3x 22.7x 44.0x
P/FCF 41.8x 22.0x 57.8x
P/Operating cash flow 34.9x 20.4x 22.1x
P/S 7.4x 3.2x 2.0x
P/B 16.3x 6.1x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 17.3x 8.8x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 27.1x 15.7x –
EV/EBIT 32.3x 18.1x –
EV/Revenue 7.5x 3.9x –
EV/FCF 42.9x 26.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 35.8x 24.6x 22.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.72 3.39 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHUNF
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 7.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 8.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.8% -1.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 7.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 11.3% -1.9% -26.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 5.5% 1.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 1.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 6.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% -12.1% -30.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 4.0% -1.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -13.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% 5.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHUNF
Gross margin 51.0% – –
EBITDA margin 27.8% 24.6% –
Operating margin 23.4% 21.4% –
Pretax margin 22.5% 18.9% –
Net margin 17.8% 14.2% –
FCF margin 17.6% 14.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 21.1% 15.7% –
Return on equity 39.8% 27.2% –
Return on assets 19.5% 6.9% –
Return on invested capital 28.2% 13.1% –
Return on capital employed 34.2% 16.2% –
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.1x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHUNF
Debt / assets 22.8% 34.3% –
Debt / equity 0.5x 1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.7x –
Debt / FCF 1.2x 4.9x –
Liabilities / assets 51.1% 75.1% 22.3%
Equity / assets 48.9% 24.9% 77.7%
Interest coverage 25.3x 6.3x –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.1x 3.1x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.5x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 13.19 2.76 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHUNF
Dividend yield 0.9% 2.0% 0.6%
Net buyback yield 1.2% 3.1% –
Shareholder yield 2.1% 5.1% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.2% 43.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% 43.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.8% 8.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 13.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTASMRSHUNF
Forward P/E 36.4xFY2026 18.8xFY2026 31.9xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $5.85FY2026 $10.21FY2026 $7.88FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026 -2.7%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +15.4% +12.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $30.28BFY2026 $2.79BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026 +10.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +6.4% -9.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTASMRSHUNF
Held by institutions 67.6% 93.9% 81.3%
Institutions holding 1,431 1,497 340
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% +2.8% -2.5%
Institutions buying 658 625 162
Institutions selling 576 652 121
Buyers to sellers 1.14 0.96 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTASMRSHUNF
CTAS 1.00 0.43 0.57
MRSH 0.43 1.00 0.26
UNF 0.57 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTAS, MRSH and UNF?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cintas (CTAS) $86.60B, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) $92.72B, Unifirst (UNF) $4.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, CTAS, MRSH and UNF?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cintas (CTAS) 42.0x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 22.9x, Unifirst (UNF) 44.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is cheapest (Cintas (CTAS) 36.4x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 18.8x, Unifirst (UNF) 31.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cintas (CTAS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 14.2%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Unifirst (UNF) returned the most: Cintas (CTAS) +12.1%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +5.2%, Unifirst (UNF) +57.4%. Over five years, Cintas (CTAS) compounded fastest (Cintas (CTAS) +14.5%/yr, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +2.9%/yr, Unifirst (UNF) +4.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) has the highest dividend yield: Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 0.02%, Unifirst (UNF) 0.00%. Unifirst (UNF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Cintas (CTAS) 23.8%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 25.8%, Unifirst (UNF) 34.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTAS, MRSH and UNF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.