CTAS vs MRSH vs GEO Stock Comparison

Cintas, Marsh & Mclennan Companies and Geo Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CTAS Cintas Corp
$218.07 +10.3% 1M +18.6% 1Y
Market cap
$87.12B
P/E
42.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.86%
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins
GEO Geo Group Inc
$28.52 -7.9% 1M +71.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.77B
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.83B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 5, Geo 4, Marsh & Mclennan Companies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTASMRSHGEOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $87.12B $93.59B $3.77B MRSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 42.3x 23.2x 12.8x GEO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.3x 19.3x 21.3x MRSH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +7.6% +15.3% GEO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.8% 14.2% 10.3% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.2% 13.1% 7.5% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.7x 3.3x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.86% 1.92% 0.00% MRSH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.6% +9.5% +71.0% GEO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.0%/yr +3.4%/yr +28.4%/yr GEO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.7% 25.9% 49.2% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 32/100 55/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

CTASMRSHGEO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTASMRSHGEO
Valuation 21 #90 of 113 9 #108 of 119 53 #54 of 113
Growth 73 #27 of 96 16 #96 of 114 59 #40 of 96
Profitability 99 #2 of 91 70 #33 of 106 59 #38 of 91
Financial Health 69 #38 of 122 10 #94 of 104 33 #82 of 122
Shareholder Returns 43 #38 of 66 58 #45 of 105 69 #21 of 66
Overall 61 32 55
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • MRSH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • GEO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTASMRSHGEOSPY
1 month +10.3%+15.6%-7.9% +0.7%
3 months +5.5%+2.9%-7.0% +3.7%
6 months +24.8%+17.5%+54.1% +7.1%
Year to date +16.0%+6.2%+76.9% +12.8%
1 year +18.6%+9.5%+71.0% +11.9%
3 years +73.5%+4.7%+225.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +20.2%+1.5%+48.3% +22.8%
5 years +101.4%+18.1%+248.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +15.0%+3.4%+28.4% +10.9%
10 years +723.4%+210.5%+82.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +23.5%+12.0%+6.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCTASMRSHGEOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.7%25.9%49.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.9%24.7%50.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.10-0.390.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.780.371.44 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-35.6%-62.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.5%-1.2%-13.0% -1.2%
52-week high $225.93$199.34$32.78 $779.14
52-week low $163.55$157.32$13.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTASMRSHGEO
P/E now vs peer median 42.3xmedian 21.9x 23.2xmedian 10.7x 12.8xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 0.9x 3.3xmedian 1.4x 1.3xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.8xmedian 11.9x 16.0xmedian 7.5x 11.5xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 42.8xmedian 14.4x 22.5xmedian 8.5x 142.7xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 2.4x 6.3xmedian 1.5x 2.5xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.79median 0.97 3.47median 0.60 0.50median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTASMRSHGEO
Revenue $11.56B $28.46B $2.83B
Gross profit $5.89B – –
Operating income $2.70B $6.09B $315.54M
Net income $2.06B $4.12B $291.54M
Free cash flow $2.03B $4.15B $26.44M
EPS (diluted) $5.10 $8.44 $2.21
Cash & equivalents $243.60M $1.84B $54.99M
Total debt $2.43B $20.53B $6.34B
Shares (diluted) 404.29M 479.00M 132.02M
Enterprise value $86.21B $85.98B $3.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHGEO
P/E 42.3x 23.2x 12.8x
P/FCF 42.8x 22.5x 142.7x
P/Operating cash flow 35.8x 20.9x 19.0x
P/S 7.5x 3.3x 1.3x
P/B 16.7x 6.3x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 17.7x 9.0x 2.7x
EV/EBITDA 27.8x 16.0x 11.5x
EV/EBIT 33.1x 18.4x 16.7x
EV/Revenue 7.7x 3.9x 1.9x
EV/FCF 43.9x 27.0x 199.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 36.7x 25.1x 26.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.79 3.47 0.50

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHGEO
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 7.6% 15.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 8.6% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.8% -1.0% 11.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 7.8% -7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.3% -1.9% 222.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 5.5% 28.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 1.0% 242.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 6.7% 25.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% -12.1% -16.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 4.0% -4.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -13.9% -79.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% 5.1% -42.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHGEO
Gross margin 51.0% – –
EBITDA margin 27.8% 24.6% 16.1%
Operating margin 23.4% 21.4% 11.2%
Pretax margin 22.5% 18.9% 14.0%
Net margin 17.8% 14.2% 10.3%
FCF margin 17.6% 14.6% 0.9%
Operating cash flow margin 21.1% 15.7% 7.0%
Return on equity 39.8% 27.2% 19.4%
Return on assets 19.5% 6.9% 7.7%
Return on invested capital 28.2% 13.1% 7.5%
Return on capital employed 34.2% 16.2% 9.3%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.1x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.5% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHGEO
Debt / assets 22.8% 34.3% 41.2%
Debt / equity 0.5x 1.4x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.7x 3.3x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 4.9x 58.3x
Liabilities / assets 51.1% 75.1% 59.5%
Equity / assets 48.9% 24.9% 40.5%
Interest coverage 25.3x 6.3x 2.1x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.1x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.5x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 13.42 2.79 2.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTASMRSHGEO
Dividend yield 0.9% 1.9% –
Net buyback yield 1.1% 3.1% 4.6%
Shareholder yield 2.0% 5.0% 4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.2% 43.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% 43.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.8% 8.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 13.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTASMRSHGEO
Forward P/E 37.3xFY2026 19.3xFY2026 21.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.85FY2026 $10.21FY2026 $1.34FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026 +55.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +15.4% +44.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $30.28BFY2026 $3.17BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026 +20.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +6.4% -1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTASMRSHGEO
Held by institutions 67.6% 93.9% 94.2%
Institutions holding 1,432 1,498 292
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% +2.8% -2.2%
Institutions buying 659 626 151
Institutions selling 576 652 97
Buyers to sellers 1.14 0.96 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTASMRSHGEO
CTAS 1.00 0.44 0.05
MRSH 0.44 1.00 -0.02
GEO 0.05 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTAS, MRSH and GEO?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cintas (CTAS) $87.12B, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) $93.59B, Geo (GEO) $3.77B.

Which stock is cheaper, CTAS, MRSH and GEO?

Geo (GEO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cintas (CTAS) 42.3x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 23.2x, Geo (GEO) 12.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is cheapest (Cintas (CTAS) 37.3x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 19.3x, Geo (GEO) 21.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Geo (GEO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +7.6%, Geo (GEO) +15.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 14.2%, Geo (GEO) 10.3%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 13.1%, Geo (GEO) 7.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Geo (GEO) returned the most: Cintas (CTAS) +18.6%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +9.5%, Geo (GEO) +71.0%. Over five years, Geo (GEO) compounded fastest (Cintas (CTAS) +15.0%/yr, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +3.4%/yr, Geo (GEO) +28.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) has the highest dividend yield: Cintas (CTAS) 0.86%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 1.92%, Geo (GEO) 0.00%. Geo (GEO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Cintas (CTAS) 23.7%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 25.9%, Geo (GEO) 49.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTAS, MRSH and GEO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.