CTAS vs JCI vs ARMK Stock Comparison

Cintas, Johnson Controls International and Aramark Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CTAS Cintas Corp
$214.80 +7.4% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$84.94B
P/E
41.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins
ARMK Aramark
$55.52 +1.0% 1M +38.4% 1Y
Market cap
$14.58B
P/E
38.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.85B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 6, Johnson Controls International 3, Aramark 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTASJCIARMKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.94B $95.87B $14.58B JCI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 41.2x 33.6x 38.1x JCI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 36.7x 31.8x 25.8x ARMK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% — +11.0% ARMK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.8% — 1.9% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.2% — 6.8% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x — 4.1x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% CTAS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.8% +37.9% +38.4% ARMK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.1%/yr +16.3%/yr +8.9%/yr JCI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.8% 31.8% 26.6% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 38/100 45/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

CTASJCIARMK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTASJCIARMK
Valuation 20 #90 of 112 15 #48 of 56 45 #62 of 112
Growth 71 #29 of 96 75 #14 of 52 84 #16 of 96
Profitability 98 #3 of 91 – 47 #49 of 91
Financial Health 70 #38 of 125 – 20 #100 of 125
Shareholder Returns 39 #41 of 67 25 #31 of 41 29 #48 of 67
Overall 60 38 45
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • JCI ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • ARMK ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTASJCIARMKSPY
1 month +7.4%+3.8%+1.0% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%+11.0%-3.3% +3.9%
6 months +23.3%+10.1%+22.2% +8.2%
Year to date +14.2%+30.2%+50.6% +12.9%
1 year +13.8%+37.9%+38.4% +12.3%
3 years +73.1%+223.3%+108.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.1%+47.9%+27.7% +23.3%
5 years +101.7%+112.3%+53.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.1%+16.3%+8.9% +10.9%
10 years +713.1%+254.1%+49.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year +23.3%+13.5%+4.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCTASJCIARMKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.8%31.8%26.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.3%32.6%23.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.111.160.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.581.191.44 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-43.1%-46.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.9%-1.8%-11.0% -1.2%
52-week high $225.93$158.77$62.39 $779.14
52-week low $163.55$110.85$36.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTASJCIARMK
P/E now vs peer median 41.7xmedian 21.2x 33.2xmedian 20.1x 38.2xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 0.9x 3.6xmedian 1.5x 0.7xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 11.9x —median 11.8x 14.6xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 42.2xmedian 13.7x 28.6xmedian 16.2x 33.8xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 2.4x 6.9xmedian 2.9x 4.3xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.75median 1.00 1.64median 0.99 -3.26median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTASJCIARMK
Revenue $11.56B – $19.85B
Gross profit $5.89B $9.52B $1.69B
Operating income $2.70B – $870.70M
Net income $2.06B – $382.71M
Free cash flow $2.03B – $432.81M
EPS (diluted) $5.10 $4.68 $1.43
Cash & equivalents $243.60M $618.00M $499.43M
Total debt $2.43B – $6.13B
Shares (diluted) 404.29M 610.00M 268.54M
Enterprise value $84.02B $95.87B $12.53B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTASJCIARMK
P/E 41.7x 33.2x 38.2x
P/FCF 42.2x 28.6x 33.8x
P/Operating cash flow 35.3x 24.4x 16.1x
P/S 7.4x 3.6x 0.7x
P/B 16.5x 6.9x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 17.4x 9.3x 9.9x
EV/EBITDA 27.4x – 14.6x
EV/EBIT 32.6x – 23.3x
EV/Revenue 7.6x – 1.0x
EV/FCF 43.3x – 46.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 36.2x 24.4x 22.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.75 1.64 -3.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTASJCIARMK
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% – 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% – 13.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% 10.7% 10.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% 6.8% 25.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.8% – 9.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% – 30.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.3% – 5.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% – -11.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% -7.0% 4.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 20.2% -11.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% 51.6% 18.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 27.8% 68.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% – 54.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% – 77.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTASJCIARMK
Gross margin 51.0% – 8.5%
EBITDA margin 27.8% – 7.0%
Operating margin 23.4% – 4.4%
Pretax margin 22.5% – 2.6%
Net margin 17.8% – 1.9%
FCF margin 17.6% – 2.2%
Operating cash flow margin 21.1% – 4.6%
Return on equity 39.8% 21.1% 11.5%
Return on assets 19.5% 7.3% 2.8%
Return on invested capital 28.2% – 6.8%
Return on capital employed 34.2% – 8.0%
Asset turnover 1.1x – 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x – 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTASJCIARMK
Debt / assets 22.8% – 43.9%
Debt / equity 0.5x – 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x – 4.1x
Debt / FCF 1.2x – 14.2x
Liabilities / assets 51.1% – 75.7%
Equity / assets 48.9% 33.9% 24.3%
Interest coverage 25.3x – –
Current ratio 1.5x 0.9x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.7x – 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 0.2x
Altman Z-score 13.27 – 2.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTASJCIARMK
Dividend yield 0.9% 1.0% 0.9%
Net buyback yield 1.2% – 0.3%
Shareholder yield 2.0% 1.0% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.2% – 32.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% – 28.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.8% – 12.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.5% – 2.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTASJCIARMK
Forward P/E 36.7xFY2026 31.8xFY2026 25.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.85FY2026 $4.90FY2026 $2.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +30.3%FY2026 +16.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +30.8% +21.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $26.80BFY2026 $21.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +13.6%FY2026 +15.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +6.3% -4.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTASJCIARMK
Held by institutions 67.6% 89.5% 98.9%
Institutions holding 1,430 1,597 544
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% -1.1% +0.0%
Institutions buying 657 790 320
Institutions selling 576 557 157
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.42 2.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTASJCIARMK
CTAS 1.00 -0.07 0.26
JCI -0.07 1.00 0.25
ARMK 0.26 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTAS, JCI and ARMK?

Johnson Controls International (JCI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cintas (CTAS) $84.94B, Johnson Controls International (JCI) $95.87B, Aramark (ARMK) $14.58B.

Which stock is cheaper, CTAS, JCI and ARMK?

Johnson Controls International (JCI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cintas (CTAS) 41.2x, Johnson Controls International (JCI) 33.6x, Aramark (ARMK) 38.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Aramark (ARMK) is cheapest (Cintas (CTAS) 36.7x, Johnson Controls International (JCI) 31.8x, Aramark (ARMK) 25.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Aramark (ARMK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, Aramark (ARMK) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, Aramark (ARMK) 1.9%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, Aramark (ARMK) 6.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Aramark (ARMK) returned the most: Cintas (CTAS) +13.8%, Johnson Controls International (JCI) +37.9%, Aramark (ARMK) +38.4%. Over five years, Johnson Controls International (JCI) compounded fastest (Cintas (CTAS) +15.1%/yr, Johnson Controls International (JCI) +16.3%/yr, Aramark (ARMK) +8.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest dividend yield: Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%, Johnson Controls International (JCI) 0.00%, Aramark (ARMK) 0.01%. Johnson Controls International (JCI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Cintas (CTAS) 23.8%, Johnson Controls International (JCI) 31.8%, Aramark (ARMK) 26.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTAS, JCI and ARMK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.