CTAS vs IRM vs GEO Stock Comparison

Cintas, Iron Mountain and Geo Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CTAS Cintas Corp
$225.93 +13.0% 1M +18.4% 1Y
Market cap
$86.29B
P/E
41.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins
IRM Iron Mountain Inc
$113.08 +1.5% 1M +7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$34.20B
P/E
81.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.56B
Div. yield
0.03%
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins
GEO Geo Group Inc
$27.57 -11.7% 1M +59.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.63B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.83B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 6, Geo 4, Iron Mountain 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTASIRMGEOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $86.29B $34.20B $3.63B CTAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 41.9x 81.7x 12.5x GEO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 38.6x 48.7x 20.6x GEO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +17.4% +15.3% IRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.8% 5.5% 10.3% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.2% 7.6% 7.5% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 6.7x 3.3x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.03% 0.00% IRM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.4% +7.5% +59.6% GEO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.4%/yr +19.9%/yr +29.2%/yr GEO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.3% 33.3% 49.1% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 47/100 56/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

CTASIRMGEO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTASIRMGEO
Valuation 19 #91 of 112 21 #89 of 112 53 #53 of 112
Growth 71 #29 of 96 90 #11 of 96 60 #39 of 96
Profitability 98 #3 of 91 64 #33 of 91 57 #40 of 91
Financial Health 70 #38 of 125 8 #115 of 125 34 #83 of 125
Shareholder Returns 39 #41 of 67 50 #34 of 67 74 #18 of 67
Overall 59 47 56
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • IRM ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • GEO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTASIRMGEOSPY
1 month +13.0%+1.5%-11.7% -0.8%
3 months +7.1%-10.9%-10.9% +3.5%
6 months +29.8%+0.3%+47.7% +7.0%
Year to date +20.1%+36.3%+71.0% +12.2%
1 year +18.4%+7.5%+59.6% +13.0%
3 years +82.1%+94.2%+213.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +22.1%+24.8%+46.4% +23.1%
5 years +113.7%+147.7%+259.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +16.4%+19.9%+29.2% +11.0%
10 years +747.7%+232.5%+71.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +23.8%+12.8%+5.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCTASIRMGEOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.3%33.3%49.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.3%34.4%50.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.131.160.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.790.221.21 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-40.0%-62.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-15.0%-15.9% -1.8%
52-week high $225.93$133.06$32.78 $779.14
52-week low $163.55$78.86$13.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTASIRMGEO
P/E now vs peer median 43.9xmedian 21.9x 80.4xmedian 21.9x 12.4xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 0.9x 4.5xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.8xmedian 12.2x 20.0xmedian 12.2x 11.2xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 44.4xmedian 14.3x -68.6xmedian 14.3x 138.0xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 2.3x -26.3xmedian 2.3x 2.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.89median 1.02 30.78median 1.02 0.48median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTASIRMGEO
Revenue $11.56B $7.56B $2.83B
Gross profit $5.89B $4.10B –
Operating income $2.70B $1.42B $315.54M
Net income $2.06B $434.46M $291.54M
Free cash flow $2.03B -$490.92M $26.44M
EPS (diluted) $5.10 $1.40 $2.21
Cash & equivalents $243.60M $204.79M $54.99M
Total debt $2.43B $17.35B $6.34B
Shares (diluted) 404.29M 299.85M 132.02M
Enterprise value $85.37B $33.40B $3.25B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTASIRMGEO
P/E 43.9x 80.4x 12.4x
P/FCF 44.4x -68.6x 138.0x
P/Operating cash flow 37.1x 20.3x 18.4x
P/S 7.8x 4.5x 1.3x
P/B 17.3x -26.3x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 18.3x -13.4x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA 28.8x 20.0x 11.2x
EV/EBIT 34.2x 35.8x 16.3x
EV/Revenue 8.0x 6.7x 1.8x
EV/FCF 45.5x -103.5x 194.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 38.0x 30.7x 25.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.89 30.78 0.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTASIRMGEO
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 17.4% 15.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 13.0% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% 13.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% 11.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.8% 35.4% 11.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 12.8% -7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.3% 867.3% 222.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 4.1% 28.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 897.5% 242.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 2.6% 25.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% 31.7% -16.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 17.2% -4.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% 50.3% -79.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% -60.8% -42.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTASIRMGEO
Gross margin 51.0% 54.2% –
EBITDA margin 27.8% 33.6% 16.1%
Operating margin 23.4% 18.8% 11.2%
Pretax margin 22.5% 6.7% 14.0%
Net margin 17.8% 5.5% 10.3%
FCF margin 17.6% -6.5% 0.9%
Operating cash flow margin 21.1% 21.9% 7.0%
Return on equity 39.8% – 19.4%
Return on assets 19.5% 2.0% 7.7%
Return on invested capital 28.2% 7.6% 7.5%
Return on capital employed 34.2% 7.5% 9.3%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 3.8x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.8% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTASIRMGEO
Debt / assets 22.8% 79.0% 41.2%
Debt / equity 0.5x -13.5x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 6.7x 3.3x
Debt / FCF 1.2x -35.3x 58.3x
Liabilities / assets 51.1% 105.8% 59.5%
Equity / assets 48.9% -5.8% 40.5%
Interest coverage 25.3x – 2.1x
Current ratio 1.5x 0.7x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.6x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 13.76 1.75 2.24

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTASIRMGEO
Dividend yield 0.8% 3.0% –
Net buyback yield 1.1% – 4.8%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 3.0% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.2% 229.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% -203.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.8% 16.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 11.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTASIRMGEO
Forward P/E 38.6xFY2026 48.7xFY2026 20.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.85FY2026 $2.32FY2026 $1.34FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 +55.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +28.0% +44.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $8.36BFY2026 $3.17BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 +20.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +2.2% -1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTASIRMGEO
Held by institutions 67.6% 86.2% 94.2%
Institutions holding 1,428 1,161 292
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% +1.9% -2.2%
Institutions buying 656 598 151
Institutions selling 575 377 97
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.59 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTASIRMGEO
CTAS 1.00 0.01 0.05
IRM 0.01 1.00 0.07
GEO 0.05 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTAS, IRM and GEO?

Cintas (CTAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cintas (CTAS) $86.29B, Iron Mountain (IRM) $34.20B, Geo (GEO) $3.63B.

Which stock is cheaper, CTAS, IRM and GEO?

Geo (GEO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cintas (CTAS) 41.9x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 81.7x, Geo (GEO) 12.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Geo (GEO) is cheapest (Cintas (CTAS) 38.6x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 48.7x, Geo (GEO) 20.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Iron Mountain (IRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.4%, Geo (GEO) +15.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 5.5%, Geo (GEO) 10.3%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 7.6%, Geo (GEO) 7.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Geo (GEO) returned the most: Cintas (CTAS) +18.4%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +7.5%, Geo (GEO) +59.6%. Over five years, Geo (GEO) compounded fastest (Cintas (CTAS) +16.4%/yr, Iron Mountain (IRM) +19.9%/yr, Geo (GEO) +29.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest dividend yield: Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 0.03%, Geo (GEO) 0.00%. Geo (GEO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Cintas (CTAS) 23.3%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 33.3%, Geo (GEO) 49.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTAS, IRM and GEO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.